Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-07-21

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:26 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
00:31 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:34 kun_huang boris-42: ping
00:49 boris-42 kun_huang: pong
00:49 kun_huang there is a question in a patch boris-42
00:50 kun_huang we have records of resource in context instance
00:50 kun_huang we should remove resource in cleanup step of course
00:50 kun_huang but do we need remove the records too?
00:54 kun_huang b
00:54 kun_huang boris-42:
00:55 boris-42 kun_huang: what?
00:55 kun_huang boris-42: question on above
01:10 boris-42 kun_huang: not sure that I understand it
01:11 kun_huang boris-42: our context creates many resources in runtime and record it, as self.context[tenant][images].append(image_id)
01:12 kun_huang boris-42: in cleanup step, the real resource will be deleted
01:12 kun_huang boris-42: but what about those records, do we need self.context[tenant][images].remove(image_id) ?
01:14 boris-42 kun_huang: so still not sure that I fully understand, the are varios context
01:14 boris-42 there is cleanup context that in future will touch only scenario related resources
01:14 boris-42 and there are context resoureces that should be deleted by context
01:14 kun_huang https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179578/
01:15 kun_huang john's patch
01:15 kun_huang almost okay
01:32 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
02:05 dspano joined #openstack-rally
02:25 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
02:34 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
03:10 dspano joined #openstack-rally
03:36 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario  https://review.openstack.org/203911
03:40 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
03:46 openstackgerrit Kun Huang proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Enhance Rally API  https://review.openstack.org/182245
03:49 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
04:11 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS-V1 context  https://review.openstack.org/193432
04:27 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:40 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
04:54 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
05:18 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS-V1 context  https://review.openstack.org/193432
05:20 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
05:46 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
05:54 vasanthkumar_ joined #openstack-rally
06:17 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:33 flwang1 joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
06:40 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
06:42 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:56 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
07:14 abehl joined #openstack-rally
07:17 vasanthkumar_ Hi All, I am trying to get the osprofiler data with sql statements, but I get only the info.db.params, any pointers to get the info.db.statement will help
07:20 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario  https://review.openstack.org/203911
07:23 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: hm
07:24 vasanthkumar_ Hi Boris
07:24 vasanthkumar_ Hi boris-42
07:25 vasanthkumar_ boris-42 I am able to get the osprofiler up and running, but i dont get the db-statements part of it
07:25 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: I am able to get the osprofiler up and running, but i dont get the db-statements part of it
07:26 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: did you enable it?
07:26 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: yes, tracesql_alchemy is set to true
07:27 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: so
07:28 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: this actually should work https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler/blob/master/osprofiler/sqlalchemy.py#L49
07:28 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: maybe something changed in sqlalchemy
07:29 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: let me re-confirm it again
07:30 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: i have the same sqlalchemy.py in osprofiler
07:32 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: let me tell you what i have done, to make sure my env setup is known.  used packstack on centos and enabled the profiler in cinder, nova, heat and added the profiler in ceilometer
07:33 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: seems ok
07:33 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: I belive that something may changed in sqlalchemy
07:33 boris-42 in release 1.0*
07:33 boris-42 so now statements are not captured
07:34 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:34 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: oh!, so inorder to capture the statements, what do i do
07:35 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: I do not now
07:35 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: I will play these days with OSprofiler
07:35 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: or can i go back to the previous version? if so i can try that too
07:36 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: not sure
07:36 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: it's not osprofiler version it's sqlalchemy version
07:36 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: you can try to go over documentation of latest sqlalcyhemy
07:37 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: oh! ok and one more thing, the example template.html and the template part of osprofiler are different
07:37 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: and check are properly set event listenere
07:37 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: hm not sure that I get this
07:37 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: Ok I will go through the document
07:37 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: what is that set event listner?
07:38 vasanthkumar_ boirs-42: ignore the template part thats fine
07:38 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: this part https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler/blob/master/osprofiler/sqlalchemy.py#L21-L61
07:38 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: of code maybe is not valid with the newest sqlalhemy
07:38 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: I need to sleep now
07:39 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: 1 last question "set event listener"
07:39 boris-42 мvasanthkumar_ so?
07:39 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: where do i set it?
07:40 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: ?
07:40 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: i didnt understand this point " and check are properly set event listenere" you told
07:41 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: I send you a link
07:41 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: take a look at it
07:41 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: Ok understood
07:42 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: will give a try and update you. thanks a lot for the pointers
07:42 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: thanks
07:42 vasanthkumar_ boris-42: Good night
07:42 boris-42 vasanthkumar_: thanks
07:43 cdent joined #openstack-rally
07:48 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
07:54 kun_huang joined #openstack-rally
07:55 flwang1 joined #openstack-rally
08:00 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:04 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
08:12 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:20 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:26 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
08:27 vasanthkumar_ joined #openstack-rally
08:32 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
08:35 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:43 aix joined #openstack-rally
08:44 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
08:53 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
09:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: OpenStackProvider: Allow userdata using config_drive  https://review.openstack.org/193916
09:09 rvasilets__ joined #openstack-rally
09:12 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:15 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:16 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: openstack: make scenario able to reuse clients  https://review.openstack.org/203723
09:17 albertw left #openstack-rally
09:28 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:42 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: [do-not-merge][Fuel] test fuel context ci  https://review.openstack.org/203652
09:47 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
10:15 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:41 _afazekas joined #openstack-rally
11:12 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Neutron: Make resource update methods more generic  https://review.openstack.org/202792
11:16 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
11:16 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:45 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Common] Add more streaming algorithms  https://review.openstack.org/201611
11:47 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
11:52 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add classes for task HTML report charts  https://review.openstack.org/159458
12:09 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
12:14 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add Load Profile chart to report  https://review.openstack.org/169828
12:19 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
12:23 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
12:23 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
12:32 karimb joined #openstack-rally
12:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:56 vasanthkumar_ joined #openstack-rally
13:06 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:12 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
13:17 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:26 frayedknot does someone have an example of a task that involves booting a server via context?
13:27 rvasilets frayedknot, did you look in the samples/?
13:29 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
13:29 frayedknot rvasilets: maybe not hard enough
13:30 frayedknot but I'm not finding anything with context + servers
13:31 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
13:34 rvasilets rvasilets@rvasilets-pc:~/rally$ grep -rn "servers" samples/tasks/
13:34 rvasilets frayedknot, https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/samples/tasks/scenarios/nova/list-servers.json
13:35 frayedknot rvasilets: thank you
13:35 frayedknot I was looking in the wrong samples :/
13:36 frayedknot ~/.rally/plugins/samples/
13:36 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add Ironic scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/186064
13:48 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
13:52 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
13:58 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:02 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
14:07 FR0ENDS joined #openstack-rally
14:18 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
14:39 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS context, verify network extension  https://review.openstack.org/193432
14:47 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
14:49 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
14:49 tosky joined #openstack-rally
14:51 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
14:53 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
15:01 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:04 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
15:09 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
15:09 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
15:19 flwang joined #openstack-rally
15:25 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
15:27 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
15:33 kambiz joined #openstack-rally
15:33 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
15:34 spyderdyne i am looking for a way to write test configs that call multiple funcitons in a single file.  can anyone point me to a resource?
15:36 spyderdyne still a noob at this, but i have a series of test plans that I have been running with some success.  I would like to be able to combine them into a single report output
15:36 spyderdyne also, there is a cleanup function but it has not been completed yet and Rally has a habit of leaving tons of stuff behind.
15:37 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
15:37 spyderdyne is there any word on the status of the rally cleanup feature that can be manually triggered, and would it be worth considering another python script to handle cleanup instead or just for now?
15:45 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
15:46 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
16:02 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
16:10 yfried joined #openstack-rally
16:17 rvasilets yfried, Hi I want you to remember about Ironic bench. I need you review. Thx https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186064/
16:17 yfried rvasilets: will review tomorrow. sorry, I was swamped with personal stuff
16:19 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:27 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
16:27 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
16:54 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
16:54 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
17:11 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
17:17 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:21 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
17:27 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
17:27 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
17:27 dpaterson anyone know if Rally is doing a mid-cycle meetup?
17:29 breton joined #openstack-rally
17:30 breton hello folks
17:30 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
17:48 bitblt joined #openstack-rally
17:51 bitblt joined #openstack-rally
17:58 bitblt joined #openstack-rally
18:02 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
18:02 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
18:03 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:05 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:20 breton I have these logs: http://95.46.199.70/part_rally_log.txt . I am trying to run rally with keystone, benchmark description is available in the logs. In the end there is "Error Unauthorized". The tenant noted there is being remove by rally in the very beginning (search for 3316926c2db2495997e6b31250ce06a7). Why?
18:20 breton rally is the latest from docker
18:21 boris-42 breton: hi
18:21 boris-42 breton: gimme five minutes
18:23 vaidy joined #openstack-rally
18:27 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:35 karimb joined #openstack-rally
18:41 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: do-not-merge: test fuel-community-fuel-scenario  https://review.openstack.org/204209
18:59 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
19:03 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
19:03 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add CobblerProvider provider  https://review.openstack.org/188847
19:04 pboldin1 joined #openstack-rally
19:04 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:14 amit213 joined #openstack-rally
19:15 openstackgerrit Alexandr Nevenchannyy proposed openstack/rally: Rename context.context -> context.configure  https://review.openstack.org/204216
19:18 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
19:21 openstackgerrit Alexandr Nevenchannyy proposed openstack/rally: Rename context.context -> context.configure  https://review.openstack.org/204216
19:24 openstackgerrit Alexandr Nevenchannyy proposed openstack/rally: Rename context.context -> context.configure  https://review.openstack.org/204216
19:35 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
19:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: openstack: make scenario able to reuse clients  https://review.openstack.org/203723
20:19 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
20:27 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:28 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
20:54 boris-42 stpierre: ping https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203911/
20:54 boris-42 stpierre: did you see this one
20:57 stpierre i'm not sure i understand context mapping nearly well enough to review that
20:58 boris-42 stpierre: so review is great chance to undrestand that
21:14 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:16 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:32 karimb joined #openstack-rally
22:00 openstackgerrit Alexandr Nevenchannyy proposed openstack/rally: Rename EngineFactory -> Engine  https://review.openstack.org/204280
22:01 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
22:17 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
22:45 openstackgerrit Omar Khalid proposed openstack/rally: Ability to boot VMs on each compute node Also add ability for rally to create admin users since VMs will be associated with right users Plus do not have to change all utility functions https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/rally-hypervisor-boot  https://review.openstack.org/151899
22:50 redixin joined #openstack-rally
22:51 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
23:07 openstackgerrit Omar Khalid proposed openstack/rally: VM-VM throughput L2/L3 scenario support  https://review.openstack.org/151905
23:08 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary