Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-07-22

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:02 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
00:04 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
00:07 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
00:09 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
00:25 mahito joined #openstack-rally
00:26 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:30 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:38 mahito_ joined #openstack-rally
00:51 dspano joined #openstack-rally
00:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:11 dspano joined #openstack-rally
02:30 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:10 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
03:17 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
03:22 openstackgerrit Angus Lees proposed openstack/rally: Add os-ansible-deployment deployment engine  https://review.openstack.org/203482
03:22 openstackgerrit Angus Lees proposed openstack/rally: OpenStackProvider: Purge disabled code that reads arbitrary files  https://review.openstack.org/193917
03:22 openstackgerrit Angus Lees proposed openstack/rally: OpenStackProvider: Refresh IPs before looking for access IP  https://review.openstack.org/204360
03:22 openstackgerrit Angus Lees proposed openstack/rally: OpenStackProvider: Optionally wait for cloud-init  https://review.openstack.org/204361
03:29 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
03:35 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:47 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:49 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
03:50 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
03:54 openstackgerrit Kun Huang proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Enhance Rally API  https://review.openstack.org/182245
04:00 CoffeeChou joined #openstack-rally
04:00 CoffeeChou left #openstack-rally
04:09 gema joined #openstack-rally
04:30 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:34 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/204379
04:40 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
04:50 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
04:53 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:06 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
05:42 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:05 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
06:06 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
06:26 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
06:29 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
06:57 rdas joined #openstack-rally
07:09 vaidy e0ne, hi
07:09 vaidy e0ne, let me check
07:12 albertw1 joined #openstack-rally
07:19 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS context, verify network extension  https://review.openstack.org/193432
07:22 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:24 openstackstatus NOTICE: zuul is undergoing an emergency restart. Jobs will be re-queued but some events may be lost.
07:31 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
07:43 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS context, verify network extension  https://review.openstack.org/193432
07:44 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:51 tfreger left #openstack-rally
07:51 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
07:55 kiran-r Jenkins not running
07:55 kiran-r All tests are queued but none are running
07:56 neeti joined #openstack-rally
08:04 vasanth joined #openstack-rally
08:04 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:10 aix joined #openstack-rally
08:13 vasanthkumar_ joined #openstack-rally
08:14 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:15 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
08:15 openstackstatus NOTICE: zuul jobs are currently stuck while problems with gearman are debugged
08:15 Topic for #openstack-rally is now zuul jobs are currently stuck while problems with gearman are debugged
08:16 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
08:20 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:32 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:33 abehl joined #openstack-rally
08:34 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:35 mahito joined #openstack-rally
09:05 yfried joined #openstack-rally
09:07 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:17 karimb joined #openstack-rally
09:22 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
09:29 karimb joined #openstack-rally
09:52 rediskin joined #openstack-rally
09:54 tuvenen joined #openstack-rally
10:17 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:23 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
10:35 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
10:43 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
10:57 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:18 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:25 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
11:40 openstackgerrit Alexandr Nevenchannyy proposed openstack/rally: Rename context.context -> context.configure  https://review.openstack.org/204216
11:41 yfried joined #openstack-rally
11:48 exploreshaifali_ joined #openstack-rally
11:49 amaretskiy kun_huang hi
11:49 amaretskiy kun_huang: please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201611/7/rally/common/streaming_algorithms.py,cm
11:50 amaretskiy kun_huang: can you reconsider your `-1'? The change requested by you looks not related to the patch
11:54 dspano joined #openstack-rally
11:55 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
12:15 yfried amaretskiy: rediskin: http://paste.openstack.org/show/399785/
12:15 yfried have you seen this error with tox?
12:15 yfried rvasilets: I looked at your Ironic patch and it's -1ed
12:16 amaretskiy yfried: I saw similar error today while running another tox environment
12:16 yfried amaretskiy: any idea how to fix?
12:18 amaretskiy yfried: as temporary fix - remove all lines with python_version=='2.6' from test-requirements.txt
12:19 amaretskiy yfried: wee need to investigate this to make a permanent solution/patch set
12:19 yfried amaretskiy: tnx
12:19 yfried do we have a bug against it?
12:19 yfried amaretskiy: ^
12:19 rvasilets yfried, don't whait for +1 or 0 to start review
12:20 rvasilets yfried, I will wait for you review today
12:20 rvasilets yfried, ok?
12:20 amaretskiy yfried: I dont know, at least I haven't submitter a bug yet
12:20 amaretskiy *submitted
12:20 yfried rvasilets: could you please just push a quick fix for the -1 you got?
12:21 rvasilets I don't agree with chris -1
12:21 rvasilets and don't want to send other similar patchset
12:27 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [CONF] make ping timeout configurable  https://review.openstack.org/204577
12:27 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add ability to specify directory with murano package files  https://review.openstack.org/195677
12:32 yfried rvasilets: ok. now I saw you posted a response.
12:32 * yfried reviewing rvasilets patch
12:32 rvasilets yfried, thank you!
12:33 yfried rvasilets: please review mine in return :) https://review.openstack.org/204577
12:33 rvasilets yfried, ok
12:33 yfried rvasilets: who's the Ironic core that reviewed your patch?
12:33 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:34 rvasilets yfried, last that set +1. Let me find
12:34 rvasilets yfried, Lucas Alvares Gomes
12:34 yfried rvasilets: ack
12:34 rvasilets also Ironic ptl is looking at the patch previously
12:38 frayedknot How does one debug while writing rally plugins? It doesn't seem like tracebacks are caught if you run a task.
12:39 karimb joined #openstack-rally
12:39 yfried frayedknot: not sure what you mean, but if you use the "serial" runner you can use pdb or the IDE debugger
12:40 breton hello folks. It seams that boris yesterday fell asleep, so I'll repeat yesterday's question
12:40 breton I have these logs: http://95.46.199.70/part_rally_log.txt . I am trying to run rally with keystone, benchmark description is available in the logs. In the end there is "Error Unauthorized". The tenant noted there is being remove by rally in the very beginning (search for 3316926c2db2495997e6b31250ce06a7). Why?
12:40 rvasilets frayedknot, just run with "rally -d task start .."
12:41 rvasilets frayedknot, and read output
12:41 frayedknot yfried: Thanks. If I write a scenario that has some bad code in it, and run it, it just quits and doesn't say why.
12:41 rvasilets frayedknot, also you able to change code adding debug output
12:41 frayedknot yfried: unlike a typical python program, where you usually get at least a traceback
12:42 yfried frayedknot: I'm not sure what you mean. I haven't seen this thing before. the "-d" should give you full debug details.
12:43 yfried frayedknot: are you using pdb or some other debugger?
12:44 frayedknot yfried: Nothing yet, I'll try pdb
12:48 yfried rvasilets: please see my review
12:48 yfried rvasilets: it's a minor fix
12:49 yfried rvasilets: also, know that I won't +2 unless we have an Ironic member approving the specific patchset
12:49 yfried rvasilets: ^ that's only my reservations since I don't know Ironic at all
12:51 rvasilets yfried, Ironic guys already left his +1 and I don't want to touch them after every patchset. It was on review a lot of time.
12:52 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
12:52 rvasilets yfried, as for kwargs. Boris prefer to make scenarios with semantic as clients have. So ironic client don't have kwargs in list node function
12:56 yfried rvasilets: really? ironic.list() doesn't accept kwargs?
12:56 rvasilets yfried, yes
12:57 yfried rvasilets: don't bother them with every patch. only once I give +1.
12:57 rvasilets https://github.com/openstack/python-ironicclient/blob/master/ironicclient/v1/node.py#L40
12:57 yfried rvasilets: so you just copied the input of "list"?
12:58 yfried rvasilets: did boris post this as comment on the patch?
13:00 rvasilets yfried, yes and it was not once and not only by boris. On my patch there is no such comment because I have make right from start
13:00 rvasilets Such comment was left on others patches
13:05 yfried rvasilets: ok. +1ed
13:05 yfried rvasilets: please ask Ironic to review this again and I'll +2
13:07 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:08 yfried stpierre: rediskin: meteorfox: amaretskiy: https://review.openstack.org/204577 could you please review this? it's a simple patch that should allow some people better usage
13:08 amaretskiy yfried: sure
13:11 stpierre yfried: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192776/
13:11 stpierre :)
13:11 rediskin yfried, why this value did not appear if conf.sample?
13:11 amaretskiy yfried: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1477135
13:11 openstack Launchpad bug 1477135 in Rally "Tox raises error "SyntaxError: don't know how to evaluate 'num' '2.6'"" [Undecided,New]
13:12 yfried amaretskiy: ack. tnx
13:13 yfried rediskin: I don't understand the question
13:13 yfried stpierre: good to know.
13:13 rediskin yfried, should this option be in rally.conf.sample?
13:15 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
13:15 andreykurilin__ yfried:you should run "tox -egenconfig" to update samples
13:15 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: VMTasks: Make waiting for ping timing configurable  https://review.openstack.org/192776
13:17 yfried rediskin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192776/10
13:17 yfried rediskin: ^ apparently this patch already does that
13:17 yfried rediskin: please review
13:31 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add Ironic scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/186064
13:32 rvasilets stpierre, Chris I have changed uuid4 to genarate_random_name
13:32 rvasilets stpierre, wait for gates to be sure that ironic is working with such name
13:33 rvasilets stpierre, after I'm waiting for +2 from you
13:36 rvasilets breton, seems like its a stage of validation. Creation of tenant, check, delete this tenant
13:36 rvasilets breton, stage of cloudvalidation
13:37 rvasilets breton, cloud validation
13:38 breton rvasilets: maybe. But why this tenant is used in one of iterations?
13:41 rvasilets stpierre, locally it works fine
13:41 rvasilets breton, thinking
13:48 rvasilets breton, i'm not sure. But its probable. Do this behaivor repeated?
13:48 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
13:49 rvasilets breton,  *Did this behavior repeated?
13:51 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
13:53 breton rvasilets: yes, very often. I can reproduce it locally on almost each run
13:55 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
13:57 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
14:07 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
14:10 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
14:16 openstackstatus NOTICE: CI is currently recovering from an outage overnight. It is safe to recheck results with NOT_REGISTERED errors. It may take some time for zuul to work through the backlog.
14:16 Topic for #openstack-rally is now CI is currently recovering from an outage overnight. It is safe to recheck results with NOT_REGISTERED errors. It may take some time for zuul to work through the backlog.
14:16 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
14:18 boris-42 stpierre: rvasilets oh something changed our default topic...
14:18 boris-42 of chat
14:27 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
14:30 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
14:34 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
14:34 openstackstatus NOTICE: CI is slowly recovering, please be patient while the backlog is worked through.
14:42 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Fix] Update test-requirements.txt for new PIP 7.x parser  https://review.openstack.org/204645
15:10 yingw787 joined #openstack-rally
15:10 yingw787 hello guys
15:11 yingw787 what is the initial command prompt for rally
15:11 yingw787 if I wanted to use it in cli
15:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: VMTasks: Make waiting for ping timing configurable  https://review.openstack.org/192776
15:11 yingw787 wait whoops
15:11 yingw787 sorry
15:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add Ironic scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/186064
15:15 yingw787 is rally supported for ppc architecture
15:15 yingw787 boris-42: is rally supported for ppc architecture
15:16 stpierre yingw787: rally should be architecture-independent
15:17 yingw787 okay sounds good
15:17 stpierre if all of the libraries it uses compile on ppc then there's no reason it shouldn't work
15:20 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
15:21 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
15:23 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
15:33 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
15:38 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
15:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/204379
15:46 aix joined #openstack-rally
15:55 aix joined #openstack-rally
16:02 CrtxReavr joined #openstack-rally
16:03 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
16:13 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
16:14 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Adds LBaaS context, verify network extension  https://review.openstack.org/193432
16:21 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Change endpoint initialization  https://review.openstack.org/202188
16:30 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
16:32 arcimboldo Hi guys. Whatever values I chose for "times" and "concurrency" for the runner, the *last batch* of VMs seems to take much more time than the previous, but I wonder if the time computation is wrong?
16:38 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
16:40 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add image_command_customizer context  https://review.openstack.org/183227
16:40 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add boot_runcommand_delete_custom_image scenario  https://review.openstack.org/183228
17:06 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
17:18 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
17:25 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
17:33 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] scenario for add and remove node  https://review.openstack.org/181270
17:33 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Environments scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/182873
17:43 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:48 tab____ joined #openstack-rally
17:49 CrtxReavr joined #openstack-rally
17:50 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
17:55 yfried joined #openstack-rally
17:58 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
17:59 davidlenwell boris-42: meet puranamr .. he's going to be using rally to get some perfomance data out of the akanda networking stack.. I've instructed him to post questions here.
18:03 boris-42 davidlenwell: hi there
18:03 boris-42 puranamr: hi
18:03 davidlenwell hi boris-42!
18:03 davidlenwell are you stateside yet?
18:19 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
18:19 puranamr boris-42: hi
18:24 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
18:28 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:38 ipo joined #openstack-rally
18:40 ipo joined #openstack-rally
18:40 ipo joined #openstack-rally
18:41 ipo joined #openstack-rally
18:45 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:54 boris-42 davidlenwell: yep I am here =)
18:54 davidlenwell boris-42: you should come to this meetup! http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/223611752/
18:55 boris-42 davidlenwell: will be there
19:07 frayedknot There's not a built in way to get the instances/networks/users created via context is there? I just want to make sure I'm not wasting effort.
19:11 ipo joined #openstack-rally
19:11 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:19 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
19:24 boris-42 frayedknot: ?
19:24 boris-42 frayedknot: there are such context
19:24 boris-42 frayedknot: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/nova/servers.py
19:25 boris-42 frayedknot: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/network/networks.py
19:25 frayedknot borish-42: say I create an instance with context and I want to get the object in python - is there a built in way to get the server/network that is created for use in a scenario?
19:25 frayedknot boris-42
19:26 frayedknot Right now I just get a nova client and search for severs called "rally_.*"
19:28 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:32 boris-42 frayedknot: let me show the sample
19:33 boris-42 frayedknot: this is simple https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/vm/vmtasks.py#L162
19:33 boris-42 frayedknot: sample of using in scenario data that was added by allow_ssh
19:33 boris-42 frayedknot: context
19:34 boris-42 frayedknot: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/network/allow_ssh.py#L107-L109
19:34 frayedknot thanks so much, boris-42!!
19:37 frayedknot I was missing the whole self.context part
19:51 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
19:53 frayedknot Are there plans to release API documentation for rally plugins?
19:53 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
19:54 karimb joined #openstack-rally
19:57 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
20:11 boris-42 frayedknot: there is plan to do that automatically
20:11 boris-42 frayedknot: just after we finish switching to plugin base
20:17 boris-42 frayedknot: for now you have rally info command
20:27 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
20:33 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
20:43 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
20:43 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
20:50 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
21:25 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
21:26 klindgren__ joined #openstack-rally
21:30 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:39 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
21:44 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
22:55 spyderdyne_ joined #openstack-rally
23:09 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
23:38 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
23:55 dmorita joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary