Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-08-27

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:05 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: WIP Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/210137
00:16 madhu_ak boris-42: ping
00:16 madhu_ak or anyone around?
00:57 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
01:00 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:03 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
01:08 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
01:08 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
01:11 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
01:12 amywang_ joined #openstack-rally
01:32 amywang_ joined #openstack-rally
01:35 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
01:42 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
01:45 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:49 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
02:02 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
02:10 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
02:14 amywang joined #openstack-rally
02:37 kun_huang boris-42: that topic is not accepted :(
03:02 boris-42 kun_huang: yep it happens
03:03 kun_huang boris-42: btw are you interested in a existing-vm context for vm workload?
03:07 boris-42 kun_huang: so not sure that it will work well for now
03:07 boris-42 kun_huang: because of cleanup
03:07 boris-42 kun_huang: but sounds quite interesting
03:08 kun_huang yep, let me have a try
03:14 boris-42 kun_huang: imho it's better for now to concentrate on old patches
03:14 boris-42 kun_huang: than adding more to queue
03:15 boris-42 kun_huang: we should keep under 100 open patches it's better even to keep under 50
03:15 kun_huang okay
03:15 kun_huang btw gate is broken again?
03:16 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Fix the scenario plugin sample  https://review.openstack.org/217320
03:16 boris-42 kun_huang: Mirantis Rally CI?
03:16 kun_huang https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210137/
03:17 kun_huang nearly all broken
03:17 kun_huang and the log file is huge
03:18 boris-42 kun_huang: I belive it is patch
03:18 boris-42 kun_huang: not gates
03:18 kun_huang hope so, I'm watching that
03:18 boris-42 kun_huang: this worked few hours ago https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217320/
03:18 boris-42 kun_huang: and I believe it will work
04:24 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
04:27 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
05:16 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
05:20 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix the scenario plugin sample  https://review.openstack.org/217320
05:28 zerda joined #openstack-rally
05:48 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
05:59 psd_mo joined #openstack-rally
06:02 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:35 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:38 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:40 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
06:40 yfried_ boris-42: where you looking for me?
06:43 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:57 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:18 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:20 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
07:24 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:41 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
07:55 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:00 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:09 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:11 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
08:13 tosky joined #openstack-rally
08:35 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:48 openstackgerrit Lubosz Kosnik proposed openstack/rally: Remove cleanup context in scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/217582
08:54 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:20 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
09:56 cdent joined #openstack-rally
10:40 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
10:52 yfried_ amaretskiy: can you please answer some FUEL related questions?
10:52 amaretskiy yfried_: hi
10:52 amaretskiy yfried_: I will try :)
10:53 yfried_ amaretskiy: is it capable of "provisioning" the nodes as well? does it install operating system as well as openstack?
10:54 amaretskiy yfried_: fuel does that, it installs os (choice from ubuntu and centos) and then installs openstack
10:54 yfried_ amaretskiy: what about network settings?
10:54 amaretskiy yfried_: fuel has web ui (as well as cli) to do all these actions
10:54 yfried_ amaretskiy: will it act as DHCP/GW?
10:57 amaretskiy yfried_: fuel is actually a "master node" that provides web ui/cli, and this node has full control on hardware hodes (create/update/delete clouds), afaik it uses DHCP however that is something that works behind the scene
10:58 amaretskiy yfried_: fuel is a complete solution to work with clouds, it uses management network for that
11:00 amaretskiy i think that fuel-related questions are better to ask on fuel channel, because there is a place of fuel gurus :)
11:00 amaretskiy yfried_: ^
11:01 yfried_ amaretskiy: tnx
11:02 yfried_ amaretskiy: any idea where Boris is? he's been pinging me very late the last 2 days.
11:02 amaretskiy yfried_: Boris is living in US now, so I think he is sleeping now :)
11:02 amaretskiy yfried_: time zones :)
11:16 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
11:24 neeti joined #openstack-rally
11:33 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:37 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:39 neeti joined #openstack-rally
11:43 fhubik_ joined #openstack-rally
12:02 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
12:14 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
12:14 morgan_orange joined #openstack-rally
12:14 fhubik_ joined #openstack-rally
12:22 haigang joined #openstack-rally
12:25 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:32 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
12:37 anshul joined #openstack-rally
12:42 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
12:43 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
12:44 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
12:44 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:45 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:52 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
13:03 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Use new reports charts classes  https://review.openstack.org/146814
13:05 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
13:06 I joined #openstack-rally
13:07 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
13:07 moravec joined #openstack-rally
13:10 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
13:12 anshul joined #openstack-rally
13:26 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add Load Profile chart to report  https://review.openstack.org/169828
13:28 amywang_ joined #openstack-rally
13:39 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
13:42 morgan_orange hi
13:45 morgan_orange I used to integrate rally to test OPNFV solution.  I got an error now. I saw in  IRC Rally thread (http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally/2015-03-06/text 17h24) someone got the same error. My understanding is that we shall now use keystone v3, is it correct?
13:46 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
13:58 andreykurilin morgan_orange: hi
13:58 morgan_orange andreykurilin: hi
13:59 andreykurilin morgan_orange: it depends on you cloud:) If you use keystone v3, deployment config requires additional options
13:59 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:02 moravec joined #openstack-rally
14:03 morgan_orange andreykurilin: well I do not use keystone v3. My Clouds (one installed with fuel and one installed with foreman/puppet) did not change since Arno release. But I am no more able to launch the benchs (Tempest still OK) I got an error ContextSetupFailure: Unable to setup context 'users': 'Failed to create the requested number of tenants.'
14:15 andreykurilin morgan_orange: can you launch Rally in debug mode?
14:16 morgan_orange yes I made last test in debug mode
14:17 andreykurilin Do you have traceback?
14:18 morgan_orange andreykurilin: http://pastebin.com/SjeNTgMn
14:19 andreykurilin you are well prepared:)
14:20 andreykurilin morgan_orange: you should try to specify endpoint via deployment config
14:20 andreykurilin morgan_orange: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/samples/deployments/existing-with-given-endpoint.json#L6
14:21 baker joined #openstack-rally
14:26 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Show task uuid or task results file name in report  https://review.openstack.org/215598
14:34 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
14:41 redixin joined #openstack-rally
14:42 baker joined #openstack-rally
14:55 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
15:05 morgan_orange andreykurilin: almost the same http://pastebin.com/aTfSxFuQ got a 404 instead of no answer (line 120), but I have some doubts on the public IP, according to the installer public IP = OS_AUTH_URL
15:07 morgan_orange andreykurilin: note I used to create the deployment from env before
15:13 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
15:14 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
15:21 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
15:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/217504
15:26 akrzos_ joined #openstack-rally
15:27 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
15:27 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
15:48 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
15:48 moravec joined #openstack-rally
16:04 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
16:10 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
16:10 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
16:22 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add method objects.Task.get_results_with_info()  https://review.openstack.org/214695
16:25 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add method objects.Task.get_results_with_info()  https://review.openstack.org/214695
16:26 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:27 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
16:39 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
16:42 jaredrohe joined #openstack-rally
16:47 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
16:48 boris-42 yfried_: yep
16:48 boris-42 yfried_: I am looking for you for a week
16:48 boris-42 =)
16:48 boris-42 yfried_: timezones =(
16:53 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
16:55 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
17:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix typo in Rally Installation document  https://review.openstack.org/217054
17:24 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
17:24 amywang_ joined #openstack-rally
17:41 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
17:45 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:49 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
17:54 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
18:03 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:15 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:19 moravec joined #openstack-rally
18:26 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
18:27 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
18:39 yfried_ boris-42: hi, you know, I do have e-mail :)
18:39 yfried_ boris-42: sorry, but we just had a new baby born and evenings are now hard to multi-task
18:40 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
18:47 yfried_ boris-42: so, what do you need
18:47 yfried_ ?
18:48 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila with autocreated resources + benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/187643
19:00 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
19:06 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
19:11 aix joined #openstack-rally
19:13 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:17 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:17 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:23 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
19:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:42 moravec joined #openstack-rally
19:45 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:59 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
20:05 baker joined #openstack-rally
20:06 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
20:08 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
20:32 baker joined #openstack-rally
20:33 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila with autocreated resources + benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/187643
20:39 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
20:56 moravec joined #openstack-rally
20:56 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
21:07 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
21:08 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
21:41 amywang_ joined #openstack-rally
21:48 baker joined #openstack-rally
21:54 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
22:06 pvaneck_ joined #openstack-rally
22:08 temujin_ joined #openstack-rally
22:17 boris-42 madhu_ak: piiing
22:17 madhu_ak boris-42: hi ya
22:18 madhu_ak boris-42: I have a question
22:18 boris-42 madhu_ak: sure
22:18 madhu_ak can we import files from neutron project when writing rally tests?
22:19 boris-42 madhu_ak: soooo somebody other was doing the same
22:19 boris-42 madhu_ak: VPNaaS
22:19 boris-42 project
22:19 madhu_ak exactly
22:19 boris-42 madhu_ak: so we found the issue
22:19 madhu_ak oh okay, hacking using noop method that you suggeste?
22:20 boris-42 that both projects (rally & neutron) are calling cfg.CONF.register_cli
22:20 boris-42 madhu_ak: yep
22:21 madhu_ak ah, I see.
22:21 madhu_ak curious to ask, when I try to run the tests for VPNaaS, I am hitting no benchmark can be found.. Is there anything that I am doing wrong?
22:22 boris-42 madhu_ak: so if module is not imported well
22:23 madhu_ak that means, the module is not being imported from neutron project
22:23 madhu_ak So, is there any restrictions that is imposed in rally like, against importing module from neutron projects? like from neutron.....
22:23 boris-42 madhu_ak: autodiscovering won't find anything
22:24 boris-42 madhu_ak: so let me expalin the full situation
22:24 madhu_ak yes please
22:24 boris-42 (btw we can move this in mailing list) **
22:24 boris-42 there is one lib
22:24 boris-42 it is called oslo.config
22:24 boris-42 it has iniside it singleton
22:24 madhu_ak sure
22:25 moravec joined #openstack-rally
22:25 madhu_ak it means, that config is not autodiscovering it?
22:25 boris-42 oslo_config.cfg.CONF
22:25 madhu_ak yep
22:25 boris-42 please let me finsih=)
22:25 boris-42 so this library is used by both projects
22:25 boris-42 Rally & Neutron
22:26 boris-42 this creates mess
22:26 madhu_ak I see
22:26 boris-42 because both projects are not expecting that somebody will share oslo_config.cfg.CONF
22:26 boris-42 and they share
22:26 boris-42 everything is find until the second one calls oslo_config.cfg.CONF.register_cli_opts
22:27 boris-42 when it happens it raises exceptions
22:27 boris-42 and module with plugin is not imported
22:27 boris-42 which produce error not found your plugin
22:27 boris-42 so the ideal solution is that things that you are importing from neutron should move to neutron-lib
22:27 boris-42 that won't do register_cli_opts
22:28 boris-42 and everything will work
22:28 boris-42 or fix neturon to not do register_cli_opts if is imported as a lib*
22:28 boris-42 madhu_ak: ^
22:28 madhu_ak I see. awesome explanation
22:29 madhu_ak when I opt for moving to neutron-lib, how do you mean?
22:29 madhu_ak for example, say lbaas, we have tempest-lib in neutron-lbaas, so the tempest files are being pulled from the tempest-lib.. Is that the same way here?
22:30 madhu_ak or I am misunderstanding something
22:30 boris-42 madhu_ak: I am saying that you shouldn't import neutron *
22:30 boris-42 it seems bad idea that plugins are importing neutron
22:31 boris-42 so there should be some lib for plugins for neutron
22:31 boris-42 in case of tempest or tempest-lib you don't have CLI
22:31 boris-42 so you don't face the issue of oslo_config.cfg.CONF
22:32 madhu_ak gotcha
22:32 madhu_ak so, opting some lib for plugins for neutron is the best way then
22:33 boris-42 madhu_ak: I am talking about refactoring Neutron
22:34 boris-42 madhu_ak: E.g. splitting neutron code to 2 repos Neutron and Neutron-lib
22:34 madhu_ak oh
22:35 madhu_ak then we need to start with mailing list to make that happen for rally vpnaas tests
22:35 boris-42 madhu_ak: or there is another way
22:35 boris-42 madhu_ak: if we are importing part of neutron code it won't trigger register_cli_opts
22:35 boris-42 madhu_ak: until it make sense (e.g. you are running neutron service)
22:36 madhu_ak you meant, submitting tests in openstack/rally repo than in vpnaas repo?
22:36 boris-42 madhu_ak: no
22:37 boris-42 madhu_ak: it won't help at all it is the same for rally to have plugins inside openstack/rally repo or outisde of it
22:37 boris-42 madhu_ak: I am sayign about refactoring Neutron code
22:37 boris-42 madhu_ak: there is no way to fix this except fix neutron code
22:37 boris-42 the bug is not on Rally side
22:37 boris-42 let me start the mailing list
22:37 madhu_ak yeah I understand that.
22:38 madhu_ak sure boris-42. that would clear our thougths and then thin ahead
22:38 madhu_ak thanks for your input
22:38 madhu_ak s/thin/think
22:41 boris-42 madhu_ak: by the way why do you need to import neutron code?
22:41 boris-42 madhu_ak: is it imported by VPNaaS it self?
22:42 madhu_ak because that holds the neutron stuffs when creating necessary resources
22:42 madhu_ak like reusing the methods maybe
22:42 boris-42 madhu_ak: does VPNasaS import neutron modules?
22:43 madhu_ak yep
22:43 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
22:47 boris-42 madhu_ak: ok
22:47 boris-42 madhu_ak: and why you don't want to install openstack
22:47 boris-42 madhu_ak: with VPNaaS and benchmark neutron service?
22:47 madhu_ak how do you mean?
22:47 boris-42 via API
22:48 boris-42 devstack stack.sh
22:48 boris-42 run rally agaisnt that openstack
22:48 madhu_ak I use devstack for vpnaas tests
22:48 boris-42 so why we are importing neutron in rally plugins
22:48 boris-42 ?
22:49 madhu_ak maybe I am not following you correctly, for writing vpnaas tests in rally, vpnaas tests needs neutron to be imported
22:50 boris-42 madhu_ak: so you are benchamrking code* not service?
22:51 madhu_ak yeah, what do you think is best way to write the tests?
22:52 madhu_ak I am trying to get familiarize using rally tests across neutron's subprojects
22:52 boris-42 madhu_ak: so I am loooking at the patch
22:52 madhu_ak sure
22:52 boris-42 madhu_ak: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213781/12/rally-jobs/plugins/vpn_utils.py
22:52 madhu_ak yeah
22:53 boris-42 madhu_ak: so it is a bit strange code
22:54 madhu_ak yes it is. I came to know this morning that, we cannot import any code from neutron when writing rally tests
22:54 madhu_ak to overcome that, noop method is introduced..
22:55 boris-42 madhu_ak: so we can make it possible if we fix neutron
22:55 boris-42 a bit
22:55 boris-42 kevinbenton: ping
22:56 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
22:56 kevinbenton boris-42: yo
22:56 boris-42 kevinbenton: so we have some issues with VPNaaS
22:56 boris-42 and Rally
22:56 boris-42 and Neutron =)
22:56 boris-42 They are trying to import utils from neutron to write their tests
22:57 boris-42 and there is issue with oslo.config
22:57 boris-42 kevinbenton: here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213781/12/rally-jobs/plugins/vpn_utils.py
22:58 boris-42 for some reason when you are importing modules from neutron it runs regisister_cli_opts
22:58 boris-42 kevinbenton: what do you think about fixing this and calling this method only if shell is executed?
22:59 kevinbenton boris-42: i don't think that should be an issue
22:59 boris-42 kevinbenton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213781/12/rally-jobs/plugins/vpn_utils.py
23:00 boris-42 kevinbenton: like moving this to somewhere that will dynamically executed
23:00 boris-42 kevinbenton: here for example https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/381cac9139096bfef49952f3fd67e19451160b61/neutron/common/config.py#L225
23:00 boris-42 kevinbenton: let me propose the patch
23:02 kevinbenton boris-42: ok
23:16 madhu_ak boris-42, if you propose the patch, could you let me know? in-case I am not available, could you add my name Madhusudhan Kandadai as reviewer so I can understand
23:26 Prashant joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary