Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-08-31

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:36 tobasco_ joined #openstack-rally
01:39 amaretskiy1 joined #openstack-rally
01:41 aix_ joined #openstack-rally
01:43 kambiz joined #openstack-rally
01:45 openstackgerrit Ikuo Kumagai proposed openstack/rally: Fix typo in the code comment  https://review.openstack.org/218698
01:56 openstackgerrit Ikuo Kumagai proposed openstack/rally: Fix typo in the code comment  https://review.openstack.org/218698
02:19 flwang1 joined #openstack-rally
03:23 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
03:25 rdas joined #openstack-rally
03:35 I joined #openstack-rally
03:49 haigang joined #openstack-rally
04:07 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
04:58 ig0r__ joined #openstack-rally
05:05 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
05:47 haigang joined #openstack-rally
05:53 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
06:16 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
06:26 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
06:28 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
06:28 haigang joined #openstack-rally
06:30 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:34 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:36 haigang joined #openstack-rally
06:42 openstackgerrit nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Add create_and_update_secgroups scenario  https://review.openstack.org/209761
06:56 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:28 openstackgerrit Christian Berendt proposed openstack/rally: serverproviders/virsh: Do not use 'shell=True'  https://review.openstack.org/218677
07:35 psd_mo joined #openstack-rally
07:36 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
07:40 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
08:00 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
08:08 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
08:10 yfried amaretskiy1: ping
08:15 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
08:29 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:33 aix joined #openstack-rally
08:44 haigang joined #openstack-rally
08:50 amaretskiy1 yfried: pong
08:51 yfried amaretskiy1: some questions re engine and clients
08:51 yfried amaretskiy1: actually, before that, about the new format
08:51 yfried report
08:52 yfried amaretskiy1: we have ts, duration - could we show some sort of gant chart that will show us what each worker is doing?
08:52 haigang joined #openstack-rally
08:56 amaretskiy1 yfried: i think that data saved in the database does not provide us with sufficient  info for doing that
08:57 amaretskiy1 yfried: however maybe that is possible....
08:57 yfried amaretskiy1: because we cant assign atomic to worker?
08:58 amaretskiy1 yfried: atomic actions are stored as dict, so we miss their execution order
08:58 amaretskiy1 yfried: i believe this is possible, need to discuss that with boris-42
08:58 yfried amaretskiy1: we have their timestamp, so it's not an issue, is it?
08:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:59 yfried amaretskiy1: the dict should have a (ts) entry
09:00 amaretskiy1 yfried: timestamp - yes, but for iteration, not for atomic action. the only missed data is order of atomic actions
09:00 yfried amaretskiy1: so for now, can we do a gantt of iterations?
09:01 yfried amaretskiy1: I had a patch for applying timestamps to atomic actions
09:01 amaretskiy1 yfried: for now - no
09:01 amaretskiy1 yfried: i think we have to discuss that with boris-42
09:02 yfried amaretskiy1: when does he show up online?
09:02 amaretskiy1 yfried: because there are a lot of plans for charts
09:02 yfried amaretskiy1: for now, I'd settle on adding the data to the atomic actions so users can create these charts alone
09:03 amaretskiy1 yfried: i expect him to be online in 5 hours (wait 5 hours)
09:03 yfried amaretskiy1: ie timestamp and worker thread for each atomic action
09:03 yfried amaretskiy1: aren't you guys on the same timezone?
09:04 amaretskiy1 yfried: yes, good idea to add more details to schema of task results, however I expect your patch to be dependent on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146814/
09:04 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:05 amaretskiy1 yfried: i'm in Ukraine, and boris-42 in US :)
09:05 amaretskiy1 yfried: completely different timezones
09:05 ushkalim Hey, Have a Q about Rally behavior on the network - wanted to know when or if we open more then one TCP connection per run (per ITR maybe)?
09:05 yfried amaretskiy1: really since when is he in US? thought he was there with you as well
09:06 amaretskiy1 yfried: he moved to US about 2 months ago
09:06 yfried amaretskiy1: good for him
09:06 yfried amaretskiy1: now I understand why I can never find him online
09:07 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: please explain your question more detailed
09:08 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: for OpenStack benchmarking, rally uses openstack clients
09:09 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: openstack clients (e.g keystone, neutron) uses HTTP for api calls
09:09 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:10 amaretskiy1 amaretskiy1: actually I expect TCP connection closed after each api call (need to check), but why this is so important?
09:12 ddovbii joined #openstack-rally
09:16 ushkalim amaretskiy1, Some bg - I'm using Rally to verify HA availability the current test I'm working on is API availability, meaning the time it takes the API to recover after fail-over... So I'm using the list.servers simple scenario to check it. During the tests I've noticed that the ITR number that are failing is not correlated to the time i did the fail-over . now in order to find out why it is happening i wnated to know the network
09:16 ushkalim behaivor, e.g if Rally stay on same TCP connection then it would took a while till the timeout expire. 2nd example -  Rally is issuing a second worker to start a new TCP connection that succeeded while the first worker failing
09:21 kun_huang ushkalim: I think you could use serial mode
09:21 kun_huang serial mode means running each ITER one by one
09:21 kun_huang so the time and ITER number are meaningful
09:22 yfried amaretskiy1: ^ if the client create a new TCP session for each call, does it authenticate on each call as well?
09:22 yfried kun_huang: ^
09:23 amaretskiy1 yfried: authentication, afaik, means obtaining token
09:24 amaretskiy1 yfried: so client does authentication only when 1) it is created and 2) token is aoutdated
09:24 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
09:27 ushkalim kun_huang, serial mode will not continue to the next ITR till the last one is finished and that can give us wrong numbers on how long it took the VIP to recover (TCP retires, timeouts, etc...)
09:28 ushkalim kun_huang, with rps we know for sure that every sec an ITR is issued
09:29 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: use --debug option and you will get all TCP connections info (timestamp, parameters, RECV, RESP) to the stdout
09:33 ushkalim amaretskiy1, I'll give it a try - thx
09:33 ddovbii left #openstack-rally
09:33 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
09:33 haigang joined #openstack-rally
09:37 ig0r_ joined #openstack-rally
10:15 haigang joined #openstack-rally
10:18 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:42 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:58 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
11:30 anshul joined #openstack-rally
11:35 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
11:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix typo in the code comment  https://review.openstack.org/218698
11:47 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
11:53 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
11:53 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fixed some typos in the files  https://review.openstack.org/218580
11:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
12:08 morgan_orange joined #openstack-rally
12:15 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:21 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:21 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:29 openstackgerrit venkatamahesh proposed openstack/rally: Fixed description sentences of functions  https://review.openstack.org/218830
12:29 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
12:31 karimb joined #openstack-rally
12:39 neeti joined #openstack-rally
12:41 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:45 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
12:58 ushkalim amaretskiy1, quick update, found that for every API request a new TCP connection is opened. Regarding authentication, occurring once per ITER/scenario.
12:59 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: sure, that is what I said before
12:59 ushkalim amaretskiy1, BTW for the preparation/cleanup authentication is per API request if I'm not mistaken...
13:01 ushkalim amaretskiy1, =] thanks for the help!
13:01 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: this actually can be checked in the code  - each time the clients instance is created (e.g. clients = osclients.Clients(...endpoint here...) - the authentication is performed
13:03 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: there is no reason to run authentication for each API, but somewhere it can be performed several times - one time per on context setup/cleanup (there are usually runs several contexts setup() before scenario start and then each of these contexts runs its cleanup()
13:05 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: for example users context setup() - here we get temporary users and tenants created, then networks context setup() - here we got networks, then scenario runs N iterations, then network context cleanup(), then users context cleanup()
13:06 amaretskiy1 each this setup() and cleanup() should instantiate its own clients instance (there are reasons for that) so auth runs many times
13:07 ushkalim amaretskiy1, thinking out loud here, Can we choose to run authentication once per ALL iterations?
13:08 albertw1 joined #openstack-rally
13:08 ushkalim amaretskiy1, agree no need to run it per API...
13:10 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: iterations runs in separate threads
13:10 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: and clients are not thread-safe
13:10 amywang joined #openstack-rally
13:10 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: clients can have sockets opened, etc..
13:11 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: so having single clients instance for N threads is bad idea
13:12 amaretskiy1 ushkalim: possible question - about having a token, not clients instance - afaik this is not available/implemented
13:18 stpierre_ joined #openstack-rally
13:20 anshul joined #openstack-rally
13:22 yfried amaretskiy1: mtg today? no agenda posted
13:23 amaretskiy1 yfried: there should be a meeting
13:23 amaretskiy1 yfried: I believe... :)
13:23 ivasev joined #openstack-rally
13:23 yfried amaretskiy1: regarding the discussion we all had earlier today re engine and clients
13:24 yfried amaretskiy1: nevermind
13:24 amaretskiy1 yfried: I will add an item to agenda
13:28 amaretskiy1 yfried: now we have a small agenda :)
13:28 yfried amaretskiy1: I tried to review those but got completely lost
13:28 amaretskiy1 :-)
13:29 amaretskiy1 yfried: yes, they are complicated a bit
13:29 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:30 ddovbii joined #openstack-rally
13:32 kbyrne joined #openstack-rally
13:38 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Neutron: Add option to set gateway when creating router  https://review.openstack.org/210017
13:38 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] scenario for add and remove node  https://review.openstack.org/181270
13:38 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Environments scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/182873
13:40 anshul joined #openstack-rally
13:41 ddovbii hi, folks! I'm from murano team. Todays morning I received a message about issues with installation of Rally package downloaded from apps.openstack.org (It is strange, because I'm not specified as author of this package). the logs here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/434877/  Could you please take a look at this?
13:41 ikhudoshyn joined #openstack-rally
13:42 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Fix users/tenants in Neutron sample tasks  https://review.openstack.org/218859
13:42 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Make network context more configurable  https://review.openstack.org/210611
13:43 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Use network context for Neutron scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/210612
13:45 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: [spec] Scenario to compose multiple scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/215762
13:48 openstackgerrit Jean-Philippe Braun proposed openstack/rally: Fix lbaas resources cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/216614
13:50 neeti joined #openstack-rally
13:52 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
13:56 karimb joined #openstack-rally
13:57 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
13:59 rdas joined #openstack-rally
14:05 amaretskiy1 ddovbii: hi
14:05 amaretskiy1 ddovbii: can you report a bug for that?
14:06 ddovbii amaretskiy1: ok. no problem
14:06 amaretskiy1 ddovbii: thanks!
14:09 openstackgerrit Pierre Padrixe (stannie) proposed openstack/rally: Add global path as constant in envutils  https://review.openstack.org/216257
14:11 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
14:11 anshul joined #openstack-rally
14:15 ddovbii amaretskiy1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano-apps/+bug/1490586
14:15 openstack Launchpad bug 1490586 in murano-apps "unable to deploy Rally application" [Undecided,New]
14:15 amaretskiy1 ddovbii: thanks
14:17 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: [cli] Introduce "rally plugin" show and list commands  https://review.openstack.org/217005
14:17 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: [docs] Add plugin reference  https://review.openstack.org/218874
14:26 rdas joined #openstack-rally
14:30 CrtxReavr left #openstack-rally
14:33 CasJ joined #openstack-rally
14:36 boris-42 stpierre: ping
14:36 stpierre pong
14:41 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
14:46 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
14:47 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
14:47 boris-42 we have like meeting
14:51 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Fix users/tenants in Neutron job and sample tasks  https://review.openstack.org/218859
14:53 ikhudoshyn boris-42: I got one more question for you
14:55 rdas joined #openstack-rally
14:55 boris-42 ikhudoshyn: ok
14:56 ikhudoshyn as for naming, scenarios vs subtasks.. actually there are scenarios, not subtasks
14:56 ikhudoshyn in the new model we have task->subtasks->scenarios,
14:56 yfried boris-42: I think you are blocking https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179578/ from merging. is it still problematic?
14:56 ikhudoshyn so that method iterates thru scenarios
14:58 boris-42 yfried: uh oh I forgot that
14:58 boris-42 yfried: I will re-review it
14:59 boris-42 ikhudoshyn: nope it iterates over subtasks
14:59 boris-42 ikhudoshyn: it should iterate oversubtasks*
14:59 boris-42 ikhudoshyn: because we are running subtaskes not scenarios it self even now
15:00 ikhudoshyn hm
15:03 albertw1 left #openstack-rally
15:05 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
15:07 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/211160
15:19 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: WIP Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/210137
15:23 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
15:24 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: WIP Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/210137
15:26 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
15:31 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
15:35 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
15:37 baker joined #openstack-rally
16:13 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
16:16 baker joined #openstack-rally
16:16 ningy joined #openstack-rally
16:22 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
16:23 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
16:42 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed openstack/rally: Update monascaclient version to the latest one  https://review.openstack.org/218945
16:47 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
16:50 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
16:54 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed openstack/rally: Update to the latest monascaclient  https://review.openstack.org/218951
16:57 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
16:57 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed openstack/rally: add monasca project in Rally  https://review.openstack.org/187351
17:01 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
17:04 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
17:12 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
17:12 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
17:19 amywang joined #openstack-rally
17:20 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
17:26 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:37 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
17:39 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:43 ig0r__ joined #openstack-rally
17:48 aix joined #openstack-rally
17:51 openstackgerrit Christian Berendt proposed openstack/rally: Remove notes about aliases for 'rally use'  https://review.openstack.org/218671
17:52 openstackgerrit Christian Berendt proposed openstack/rally: Remove notes about aliases for 'rally use'  https://review.openstack.org/218671
17:59 Prashant joined #openstack-rally
18:07 ningy @boris-42 any clue for what's going on with rally jenkins ci jobs? i don't have any logs from ui link...
18:12 psd_mo joined #openstack-rally
18:25 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
19:06 yfried joined #openstack-rally
19:28 Prashant_ joined #openstack-rally
19:32 Prashant_ joined #openstack-rally
19:33 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:35 davideag_ joined #openstack-rally
19:42 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:52 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
19:55 boris-42 ningy: so they are broken
19:55 boris-42 ningy: we are working on fixing them
19:56 ningy thanks. boris-42
19:57 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed openstack/rally: update monascaclient to the latest version  https://review.openstack.org/219009
20:15 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
20:21 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed openstack/rally: Update monascaclient to the latest version  https://review.openstack.org/187351
20:46 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
21:06 vichoward1 joined #openstack-rally
21:16 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
21:35 amywang joined #openstack-rally
21:36 boris-42 stpierre: are you around?
21:36 stpierre for a bit longer
21:36 boris-42 stpierre: I am just rereviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201545/4/doc/specs/in-progress/consistent_resource_names.rst
21:36 boris-42 stpierre: what about not allowing to put anything in rally.conf
21:37 boris-42 stpierre: what if we add abbility for resources plugin
21:37 boris-42 stpierre: of cleanup
21:37 boris-42 stpierre: way to specify pattern
21:41 boris-42 have to go actually
21:42 boris-42 I will be availabel tomorrow late
21:56 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
22:10 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
22:24 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
22:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fixed description sentences of functions  https://review.openstack.org/218830
22:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove notes about aliases for 'rally use'  https://review.openstack.org/218671
22:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/218918
22:29 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:00 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
23:41 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:49 akrzos joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary