Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-09-02

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:17 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
00:19 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:37 kbaikov_ joined #openstack-rally
00:37 kbaikov_ joined #openstack-rally
00:44 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
00:45 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Do not remove network from dhcp agent if they are not supported  https://review.openstack.org/219526
00:48 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Do not remove network from dhcp agent if they are not supported  https://review.openstack.org/219526
00:48 boris-42 kun_huang: ^ uh this one is really bad
00:48 boris-42 eon`: ^
01:06 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
01:12 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:14 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
01:21 kun_huang boris-42: which issue did I miss?
01:25 mpopow_ joined #openstack-rally
01:40 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  Ã¢ËœÂ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
01:51 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:54 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
01:55 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
02:00 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
02:08 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
02:41 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
02:43 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
02:45 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
03:12 boris-42 kun_huang: that one  https://review.openstack.org/219526
03:41 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:52 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
04:45 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
04:57 Aish joined #openstack-rally
04:57 Aish Hi boris-42
04:57 Aish are you around?
04:58 boris-42 Aish: yep
04:59 Aish I am having some trouble in using the task_utils.wait_for
05:00 Aish I am creating a nova vm and using wait_for to check if it is ACTIVE.
05:01 Aish When the wait_for returns, I am asserting that the server status is ACTIVE..
05:01 Aish From the debug logs, I could see that the server has an ACTIVE status, but the assert fails..
05:03 Aish https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213781/17/rally-jobs/plugins/vpn_utils.py lines 156-166
05:03 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
05:04 Aish boris^^
05:04 Aish boris-42: ^^
05:05 boris-42 Aish: one question why you are not using already existing method for that?
05:05 boris-42 Aish: I mean rally/plugins/openstack/nova/utils.py
05:06 Aish Oh, I didn’t know about it..
05:06 Aish I shall take a look.
05:06 boris-42 Aish: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/nova/utils.py#L109-L150
05:08 Aish Thanks..  One other issue I am facing is..,
05:09 boris-42 Aish: so?
05:11 Aish When I install devstack, it creates a public network and router by default. With that existing router, if I try to create another router using rally, it fails to create the snat namespace. I am not sure if it is an issue related to rally.
05:11 Aish If i delete the existing router, then everything works fine.
05:11 boris-42 Aish: so not a bit expert in netwroking=(
05:12 boris-42 big*
05:12 Aish I understand. Just wanted to know if you have heard of it before..
05:12 Aish :)
05:13 Aish I will try using nova.utils for the previous problem.
05:13 Aish Sorry for disturbing you this late..
05:13 boris-42 Aish: so in any case amaretsky should be soon online
05:14 boris-42 Aish: so you can ping him
05:14 boris-42 Aish: he knows network better then me
05:14 Aish sure, thanks a lot boris-42. You are very helpful.
05:15 boris-42 Aish: you are welcome
05:23 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:26 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
05:26 kun_huang Aish: if you could gather the logs, it's better to fire a bug :)
05:28 Aish kun_huang: sure, I will gather logs and raise a bug if that is the case.
05:33 yfried joined #openstack-rally
05:36 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
05:37 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:44 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
06:12 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
06:50 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:53 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
06:54 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
07:02 abehl joined #openstack-rally
07:03 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:06 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:21 coolsvap_ joined #openstack-rally
07:32 karimb joined #openstack-rally
07:40 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:41 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
07:41 eon` boris-42: hi, did you ping me ?
07:48 puranamr_ joined #openstack-rally
07:48 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
07:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix lbaas resources cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/216614
08:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [spec] Refactoring Rally cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/172967
08:01 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:08 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add check for neutron extension support in utils  https://review.openstack.org/218151
08:19 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/219502
08:20 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
08:27 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:29 cdent joined #openstack-rally
08:45 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
08:49 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:20 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
09:28 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:32 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:32 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
09:36 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron LoadBalancer v1 create and delete vips  https://review.openstack.org/193818
09:44 karmatronic joined #openstack-rally
09:46 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
09:55 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:00 karimb joined #openstack-rally
10:01 karimb joined #openstack-rally
10:21 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
10:41 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
11:01 yfried joined #openstack-rally
11:02 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
11:13 ushkalim Rally as-a-Service: Run rally as a set of daemons that present Web UI (work in progress) so 1 RaaS could be used by a whole team.
11:13 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
11:13 ushkalim ^any information on this deployment type? (https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/install.html)
11:15 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
11:20 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:21 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
11:27 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
11:28 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
11:31 yfried joined #openstack-rally
11:34 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
11:44 karimb joined #openstack-rally
11:48 bapalm joined #openstack-rally
11:59 andreykurilin ushkalim: hi!
11:59 ushkalim andreykurilin, hey
11:59 andreykurilin ushkalim: unfortunatelly, Rally as-a-Service is not finished yet :(
11:59 baker joined #openstack-rally
12:00 ushkalim andreykurilin, :( any expected release?
12:00 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
12:01 ushkalim andreykurilin, will be great to have a centralized rally server to run all of our tests from :)
12:01 andreykurilin ushkalim: I suppose that next few releases will not have this great feature
12:02 andreykurilin sorry
12:02 andreykurilin ushkalim: but we all want this feature and don't forgot about it
12:03 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add check for neutron extension support in utils  https://review.openstack.org/218151
12:08 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
12:09 aix joined #openstack-rally
12:10 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:18 yfried andreykurilin: re designate (as an example)
12:19 yfried andreykurilin: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/designate/basic.py#L117-L138
12:19 yfried andreykurilin: there is no actual verification that the record is created (validate that record is in list)
12:20 yfried andreykurilin: even further - I would like to verify record is resolved in dns query
12:20 yfried andreykurilin: can I do it? is this a valid rally scenario?
12:22 andreykurilin yfried: hi! Imo, "(validate that record is in list)' should be in this original scenario. also, it looks like most of "create-*-and-list" scenarios should have such check
12:28 openstackgerrit Anastasia Kuznetsova proposed openstack/rally: Fix argument name in Murano context  https://review.openstack.org/219670
12:29 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
12:35 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
12:35 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:40 _kiran_ joined #openstack-rally
12:45 yfried andreykurilin: and what about validate that record is resolved (via dig query)? is that acceptable as well?
12:45 andreykurilin yfried: yup
12:46 yfried andreykurilin: tnx. I'll get on it
12:46 andreykurilin yfried: but it looks like such validation should be done in creation method
12:47 yfried andreykurilin: sounds reasonable
12:52 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add check for neutron extension support in utils  https://review.openstack.org/218151
13:00 Aish joined #openstack-rally
13:04 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: [Bug-Fix]: Remove ability to put incorrect kwargs for an exception  https://review.openstack.org/219687
13:25 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
13:25 karimb joined #openstack-rally
13:36 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
13:40 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
13:43 openstackgerrit Anastasia Kuznetsova proposed openstack/rally: Fix argument name in Murano context  https://review.openstack.org/219670
13:49 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
14:01 Aish joined #openstack-rally
14:06 baker joined #openstack-rally
14:09 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
14:09 _kiran_ joined #openstack-rally
14:11 _kiran_ joined #openstack-rally
14:13 karimb joined #openstack-rally
14:15 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add check for neutron extension support in utils  https://review.openstack.org/218151
14:16 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: [Bug-Fix]: Remove ability to put incorrect kwargs for an exception  https://review.openstack.org/219687
14:18 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
14:34 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
14:35 tosky__ joined #openstack-rally
14:39 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
14:39 tosky joined #openstack-rally
14:44 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
14:50 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: check devstack hooks  https://review.openstack.org/219727
14:55 gema joined #openstack-rally
14:57 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
15:01 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:22 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:28 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
15:34 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
15:35 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/rally: Add attachment-related scenarios to test on gates  https://review.openstack.org/219748
15:35 Aish joined #openstack-rally
15:37 karimb joined #openstack-rally
15:50 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
15:53 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
16:11 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
16:32 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
16:42 cdent joined #openstack-rally
16:53 Aish joined #openstack-rally
16:59 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
17:13 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:15 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Convert Rally to the new Devstack plugin model  https://review.openstack.org/184629
17:19 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Convert Rally to the new Devstack plugin model  https://review.openstack.org/184629
17:20 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
17:21 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:28 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:30 Aish joined #openstack-rally
17:36 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
17:39 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
17:58 mpopow__ joined #openstack-rally
18:28 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
18:29 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:34 aix joined #openstack-rally
18:35 boris-42 yfried: please do not merge specs
18:35 boris-42 yfried: without me
18:36 boris-42 yfried: cleanup stuff was not ready imho
18:36 yfried ok. then revert it, i won't merge wo you in the future
18:37 boris-42 yfried: let's avoid reverts
18:37 boris-42 yfried: jsut we need to asap finish that spec
18:37 boris-42 yfried: and it's strange that it is merged before another cleanup spec was merged
18:37 boris-42 yfried: this one depends on it
18:38 boris-42 yfried: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201545/
18:38 boris-42 stpierre: ping
18:38 stpierre boris-42: pong
18:42 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:56 boris-42 yfried: btw rally gates are broken at the moment
18:56 boris-42 yfried: they are testing master instead of patches (so please avoid merging stuff)
18:58 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
19:00 cdent joined #openstack-rally
19:02 yfried good to konw
19:09 coolsvap_ joined #openstack-rally
19:09 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
19:20 josdotso joined #openstack-rally
19:22 boris-42 yfried: yeep it's really badly broken
19:24 josdotso joined #openstack-rally
19:33 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
19:42 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Nova: Support auto_assign_nic when booting multiple servers  https://review.openstack.org/219855
19:55 Aish joined #openstack-rally
20:00 puranamr_ joined #openstack-rally
20:20 Aish Hi boris-42
20:20 Aish I am facing similar issues as I pointed out yday when using task.utils.wait_for for checking status of vpn_service and ipsec_site_connection.
20:20 Aish https://gist.github.com/AishwaryaT/72058fe11682368ee7e4
20:21 Aish I have compiled the issue and the code in the above gist. I think I am missing some point here..
20:21 Aish Can you please take a look?
20:21 Aish boris-42:
20:22 boris-42 Aish: sorry to busy now
20:22 boris-42 too*
20:22 boris-42 Aish: rally gates are broken
20:23 Aish Oh., no problem boris-42.. I am looking into it.. If you get time to check it, please let me know.
20:24 boris-42 Aish: from log that you send me
20:25 boris-42 Aish: I believe you are sending bad vpn_service
20:25 boris-42 Aish: in update method
20:25 boris-42 Aish: you should send not dict but real instance that is bind to the instance of client
20:25 boris-42 Aish: or provide your own update method
20:26 Aish It is the same vpn_service object that is passed to the first function.
20:26 Aish okay.
20:27 Aish thanks boris-42 will check it.
20:35 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:57 tosky joined #openstack-rally
21:15 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Do not remove network from dhcp agent if they are not supported  https://review.openstack.org/219526
21:20 Aish joined #openstack-rally
21:21 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
21:22 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
21:27 boris-42 stpierre: yfried ^ btw
21:33 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:40 pvaneck_ joined #openstack-rally
21:40 karimb joined #openstack-rally
21:43 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:02 Aish joined #openstack-rally
22:06 openstackgerrit Castulo J. Martinez proposed openstack/rally: Fixes variables in Tempest generated config file  https://review.openstack.org/219895
22:21 Aish joined #openstack-rally
22:26 emagana joined #openstack-rally
22:29 puranamr joined #openstack-rally
22:37 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
22:45 aix boris-42, Hey, free for couple of questions?
22:47 boris-42 aix: just ask
22:47 Aish joined #openstack-rally
22:49 openstackgerrit Edgar Magana proposed openstack/rally: Fix typos in Rally code  https://review.openstack.org/219904
22:49 aix boris-42, wrt spec "Make the new Rally input task format", The one nice thing is to have multiscenarios wich can run in parallel or serial order but the other potentially nice feature mentioned there is to get possibility of some HA testing (as it is mentioned there)
22:50 aix boris-42, I noticed in the example of yaml file there is mentioned ""PhysicalNode.restart" as scenario
22:50 boris-42 aix: so this is just sample of "how it can look like"
22:51 boris-42 aix: but we will make such scenarios after we get mutliscenarios and finish new task validation mechanism
22:51 aix boris-42, I see, so general question, rally is mainly benchmarking tool imo (I may be wrong)
22:51 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
22:51 boris-42 aix: so in my opinion it's testing tool*
22:52 aix boris-42, is this direction - HA testing, where benchmarking may be nice to have but not main focus acceptable?
22:52 boris-42 aix: so new input task* is one of our most important directions
22:52 boris-42 aix: as well as validation refactoring
22:53 boris-42 aix: so multiscenario load, monitoring with load as well as HA testing are topics that we are quite interested in having
22:53 aix boris-42, oh good to read
22:53 boris-42 aix: the problem is that it's very to hard to implement in such way
22:53 aix boris-42, basically that's what I wanted to read and yes, it's not simple task to achieve
22:54 boris-42 aix: to have simple interface, simple plugins, great graphs that are enough flexible
22:54 boris-42 aix: and not die in complexity and hacks
22:54 boris-42 aix: so this is the major reason why it takes so long
22:54 boris-42 aix: not that we are not interested=)
22:55 aix boris-42, ok, maybe I misunderstood Illia as he mentioned it as low priority
22:56 boris-42 aix: it's not low priority
22:56 boris-42 aix: it's just not critical for next 0.1.0 release
22:56 boris-42 aix: e.g. we won't merge it until we get 0.1.0 done
22:57 aix boris-42, anyway, he is working on multiscenario feature which is targeted for 0.2.0, I am interested in HA events - feature to be able to generate resource reboot/fail/move, are there any thoughts even spec specified or nobody has spent some time on it yet?
22:58 boris-42 aix: sooo
22:58 boris-42 aix: the best that you can do now is to write rally plugins
22:58 boris-42 aix: for restarting services, servers, doing iptables panic and so on
22:59 boris-42 aix: we can merge those even now
22:59 boris-42 aix: so when we get multi scenario ready we will automatically get HA tests as well
22:59 boris-42 aix: btw for such kind of work you don't need specs/bp just code*
23:01 aix boris-42, sounds fine
23:02 boris-42 aix: so you can start from something simple
23:02 aix boris-42, glad to hear that rally wants to head that way
23:02 boris-42 aix: e.g. just go via ssh and run custom command (I would suggest to take a look at VMTask scenario)
23:03 boris-42 aix: after that we can prepare some high level plugins e.g. iptables panic,
23:03 boris-42 aix: or restarting service via it's name *
23:03 aix boris-42, I could probably use tempest very similar way but rally is easier for non-coders for building of their own scenarios
23:03 boris-42 aix: hm?
23:04 aix boris-42, I mean It's probably easy to build a json file with chain of already implemented scenarios in rally
23:04 aix boris-42, once we have the mulriscenarios feature
23:05 boris-42 aix: so hm what we need now is to have plugins that do the work
23:05 boris-42 aix: we don't have plugin that restarts servers, services, ipatables chaos and so on
23:05 boris-42 you can work on plugins*
23:05 aix boris-42, I see, sounds good
23:06 boris-42 aix: so what I am saying is just making some plugins until you are waiting for multiscenario support
23:07 aix boris-42, yes, I got it
23:08 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
23:09 aix boris-42, I will give it some thoughts how such plugins could look like and try to do sth
23:09 aix boris-42, thanks for the input :)
23:09 boris-42 aix: so what you need to do is create new directory
23:10 boris-42 aix: in rally/plugins
23:10 boris-42 aix: e.g. rally/plugins/chaos
23:10 boris-42 aix: that will contain all plugins related to chaos
23:10 boris-42 =)
23:14 aix boris-42, yes and do m best not to make chaos onside the plugins :)
23:16 boris-42 aix: =)
23:37 Aish joined #openstack-rally
23:42 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
23:45 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:58 Aish joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary