Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-11-04

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:36 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:39 baker joined #openstack-rally
00:40 chenli joined #openstack-rally
00:48 bapalm joined #openstack-rally
01:28 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:59 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
02:11 bochi-michael joined #openstack-rally
02:49 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:49 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  Ã¢ËœÂ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
03:00 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:09 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:10 kun_huang https://github.com/jtaleric/browbeat/
03:10 kun_huang boris is not here ;(
03:12 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
03:32 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:01 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:10 bapalm_ joined #openstack-rally
04:10 gus_ joined #openstack-rally
04:14 chenli joined #openstack-rally
05:06 openstackgerrit Remo Mattei proposed openstack/rally: * Rewrote statements * Added pip parameters  https://review.openstack.org/241468
05:15 anshul joined #openstack-rally
05:19 openstackgerrit Remo Mattei proposed openstack/rally: Adding documentation on installing Rally with a proxy server  https://review.openstack.org/241095
05:22 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
05:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:39 shausy joined #openstack-rally
06:40 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
06:48 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:54 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
06:54 harshs joined #openstack-rally
07:37 yfried joined #openstack-rally
07:42 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
08:02 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:19 albertw1 joined #openstack-rally
08:29 redixin joined #openstack-rally
08:32 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
08:44 ompp joined #openstack-rally
08:56 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:00 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
09:04 jgrassler joined #openstack-rally
09:04 yfried joined #openstack-rally
09:04 jgrassler Good morning
09:04 anshul joined #openstack-rally
09:05 jgrassler I am having a bit of an endpoint isue with Rally: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/af0c187da9be8e6ed7d0
09:06 jgrassler In a nutshell, it's using the internal endpoint from the Service catalog, which is not reachable from the Rally machine.
09:07 jgrassler Configuring the problematic deployment's endpoint_type to be "public" appears to have no effect.
09:08 jgrassler Is there something I missed or does Rally generally need access to a deployment's internal endpoints?
09:08 rajesht joined #openstack-rally
09:09 rajesht kun_huang: you around ??
09:10 kun_huang rajesht: yep
09:10 rajesht need to discuss abt your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240788/2/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/nova/servers.py
09:11 rajesht kun_huang: I have ran rally tests by passing image as None in _boot_server method and tests gets completed succesfully,
09:11 rajesht kun_huang: so _boot_server actually boot instance from volume not from image.
09:11 rajesht kun_huang: actually I didn't understand your comment, could you pl make it clear.
09:12 kun_huang rajesht: that is Oleh's point, not mine
09:12 rajesht kun_huang: should I add block_device_mapping key in boot_server_kwargs in json and yaml scripts ??
09:12 rajesht kun_huang: yes, I have tested it :)
09:12 kun_huang rajesht: do you want user to set block_device_mapping  in config file?
09:13 rajesht kun_huang: ya, but we won't be having volume_id in that case
09:14 kun_huang if yes, L460 could confilt
09:15 kun_huang rajesht: conflict
09:16 rajesht kun_huang: is there any other case, where it is implemented ? I mean for my reference.
09:16 kun_huang conflict
09:16 kun_huang https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/p7t8ityK/
09:17 kun_huang sorry, see this example, L6 would raise TypeError: hk() got multiple values for keyword argument 'k'
09:17 rajesht kun_huang: I have referenced boot_server_from_volume_and_resize scenario in L157
09:17 rajesht kun_huang: sorry, this url is blocked in my organization.
09:18 rajesht kun_huang: :(
09:18 kun_huang def hk(a, **kw):
09:18 kun_huang print kw
09:18 kun_huang zl = {"k":55}
09:18 kun_huang hk(5, k=6, **zl)
09:19 * kun_huang my advice is:
09:20 kun_huang if "block_device_mapping" not in boot_server_kwargs: boot_server_kwargs['block_device_mapping']\ = {"vda": "%s:::1" % volume.id}
09:20 rajesht kun_huang: ok, thanks :)
09:20 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:21 kun_huang rajesht: Oleh metioned another issue, you should find him to argue ;)
09:21 rajesht kun_huang: ya, but it is booting from volume, not from image.
09:22 rajesht kun_huang: will catch him, thanks for your time
09:22 kun_huang you're welcome
09:36 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:46 stannie joined #openstack-rally
09:46 rajesht oanufriev: you around ?
09:47 andreykurilin jgrassler: hi
09:47 ompp joined #openstack-rally
09:48 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:48 andreykurilin jgrassler: it looks your cloud security configuration redirects urls to internal endpoint
09:49 andreykurilin jgrassler: true to hardcode endpoint value. something like https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/samples/deployments/existing-with-given-endpoint.json#L6
09:51 jgrassler andreykurilin: Ah, that looks promising. I'll try to hardwire the endpoint then. Thanks!
09:52 andreykurilin jgrassler: s/true to hardcode/ try to hardcode
09:52 andreykurilin typo
09:52 andreykurilin :)
09:57 jgrassler andreykurilin: that worked. Thanks :-)
10:03 andreykurilin jgrassler: nice to hear that
10:08 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:32 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Docs] Small fix for wrong flavor name  https://review.openstack.org/241560
10:37 bochi-michael joined #openstack-rally
10:40 ekarlso hey guys
10:40 ekarlso https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229350/5/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/designate/basic.py < comments there about?
10:40 andreykurilin hi
10:42 andreykurilin ekarlso: you should ping rvasilets, but he is offline now. I don't know what he meant
10:43 ekarlso andreykurilin: when's he typically online ?
10:43 andreykurilin ekarlso: now:)
10:43 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
10:43 andreykurilin ekarlso: I suppose, he will be online in one hour
10:44 ekarlso andreykurilin: he in .ru ?
10:44 andreykurilin ekarlso: ukraine :)
10:44 ekarlso ah
10:46 andreykurilin ekarlso: do we have designate v2 in gates?
10:46 ekarlso andreykurilin: dont think so yet :)
10:47 andreykurilin ekarlso: we should enable it, since we have experimental designate job
10:50 anshul joined #openstack-rally
10:54 bochi-michael joined #openstack-rally
10:54 khomkrit joined #openstack-rally
11:21 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
11:21 rvasilets Hi
11:21 andreykurilin ekarlso: ^
11:22 rvasilets ekarlso, Hi
11:22 andreykurilin rvasilets: ekarlso had a question about your comment here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229350/5/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/designate/basic.py
11:26 rvasilets_ joined #openstack-rally
11:28 rvasilets ekarlso, what the question you have?
11:28 ekarlso rvasilets: I dont get your comment :p
11:29 rvasilets Does designate create zone? in those scenario
11:29 ekarlso rvasilets: u need a zone to do the operations yes
11:29 rvasilets Ok. How it would be deleted after scenario would be executed?
11:30 ekarlso should be yes
11:31 rvasilets ekarlso, They must be deleted by resource manager
11:31 ekarlso rvasilets: how ?
11:34 rvasilets Look here https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/cleanup/resources.py#L460 Here are registreted two designate resources: domains and servers
11:34 rvasilets In similar way you need to add here zone
11:35 rvasilets Understand?
11:35 rvasilets ekarlso, ^
11:35 ekarlso rvasilets: yeah, where is the actual code though that does it ?
11:36 rvasilets Do what? Cleanup?
11:39 rvasilets ekarlso, ^
11:40 andreykurilin ekarlso: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/cleanup/context.py#L67-L70 https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/cleanup/manager.py#L251
11:49 ekarlso so after adding the stuff to the context do I need to change something elsE?
11:52 bochi-michael joined #openstack-rally
11:55 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
12:02 ekarlso andreykurilin: ? ^
12:03 andreykurilin ekarlso: you add only new class which describe new resource and cleanup context will discover it automaticly
12:03 ekarlso andreykurilin: ok, done then
12:04 redixin joined #openstack-rally
12:06 ekarlso rvasilets: what's the comment about creating a zone before the scenario?
12:08 shausy joined #openstack-rally
12:09 openstackgerrit Endre Karlson proposed openstack/rally: Add Designate API V2 support  https://review.openstack.org/229350
12:11 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Support jinja2 in rally.ui.utils  https://review.openstack.org/240807
12:13 aix joined #openstack-rally
12:14 rvasilets ekarlso, You scenario called create_and_list_recordsets. So as a user I expect to see there usage of two(exactly) atomic actions: create_recordset and list_recordset. But when I look at report I saw there another atomic: create_zone. Its not what I expect to see. So there is two ways of solving this. 1) Create Zone context and just use it before scenario(if we want to create zone). I think its the best way or 2) Change the name to something
12:14 rvasilets ugly. That will say to user what exactly atomic actions would be executed during scenario
12:16 ekarlso rvasilets: could u make a fix with what you think is best ?
12:16 rvasilets ekarlso, Personally I for the first way. Do you want to measure create_zone during create_recordset and list_recordset?
12:19 redixin rvasilets how about just adding atomic timers for create_recordset and list_recordset?
12:22 ekarlso rvasilets: nope
12:22 redixin hm. seems there is already added atomic timers, so we can see all numbers
12:22 rvasilets redixin, But it doesn't solve the problem of unexpected create_zone atomic in the report
12:23 rvasilets ekarlso, you need to add you scenarios to https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally-designate.yaml to see how it works in gate
12:23 redixin oh, i see now. yes, it would be much better so have zone context
12:24 redixin or just different name for scenario
12:26 ekarlso meh, no time to do it atm :(
12:26 yfried joined #openstack-rally
12:26 ekarlso oh well, later then
12:36 yfried joined #openstack-rally
12:50 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: Add timestamps and metadata into creating samples  https://review.openstack.org/227343
12:50 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: Add batching for samples creation in context  https://review.openstack.org/232968
12:54 fhubik_brb joined #openstack-rally
12:57 tosky joined #openstack-rally
12:57 andreykurilin rvasilets: context is not the same as scenario. context should do only preparation (for example create networks, so we will be able to boot vm in it). scenario should do what we want exactly check. so splitting create_and_list to context and list is a wrong way.
12:58 andreykurilin rvasiltes: create_and_list should create and list some resource in each iteration
13:02 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
13:02 andreykurilin ekarlso, rvasilets: not sure that extending rally-designate.yaml will help at all for current moment. As far as I understand it configured only with designate api v1 now :(
13:04 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
13:05 ompp joined #openstack-rally
13:12 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][Spec] Task export  https://review.openstack.org/241596
13:13 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:16 mwagner joined #openstack-rally
13:47 baker joined #openstack-rally
13:51 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Fix timeout for scenario runners  https://review.openstack.org/235910
14:04 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: Add timestamps and metadata into creating samples  https://review.openstack.org/227343
14:04 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: Add batching for samples creation in context  https://review.openstack.org/232968
14:14 dspano joined #openstack-rally
14:24 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Task export  https://review.openstack.org/241596
14:27 openstackgerrit Ilya Popov proposed openstack/rally: This test searches for seldom used names in python source code If name is used less than two times - error is reported  https://review.openstack.org/241621
14:33 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Change rps by function  https://review.openstack.org/234195
14:47 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
14:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
15:16 emagana joined #openstack-rally
15:31 harshs joined #openstack-rally
15:32 ompp joined #openstack-rally
15:37 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
15:37 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
16:00 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
16:22 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
16:30 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: [do-not-merge] test lbaas fix  https://review.openstack.org/241677
16:54 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper to support different API versions  https://review.openstack.org/240903
17:10 ompp joined #openstack-rally
17:28 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:34 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:43 baker joined #openstack-rally
17:58 baker joined #openstack-rally
18:15 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:16 psd joined #openstack-rally
18:17 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:22 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add AST checker for missing @ddt.ddt decorators  https://review.openstack.org/240099
18:32 harshs joined #openstack-rally
18:36 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:50 omp_ joined #openstack-rally
19:00 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
19:13 emagana_ joined #openstack-rally
19:14 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:49 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper to support different API versions  https://review.openstack.org/240903
19:53 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper to support different API versions  https://review.openstack.org/240903
19:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Support jinja2 in rally.ui.utils  https://review.openstack.org/240807
20:00 Aish joined #openstack-rally
20:29 zackf joined #openstack-rally
20:50 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper to support different API versions  https://review.openstack.org/240903
20:53 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper to support different API versions  https://review.openstack.org/240903
21:13 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Implement new random name generator for wrapper plugins  https://review.openstack.org/226387
21:13 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Remove old random name generator  https://review.openstack.org/226388
21:13 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Make name_matches_object accept list of objects  https://review.openstack.org/241769
21:21 Aish joined #openstack-rally
21:25 openstackgerrit Marcela Bonell proposed openstack/rally: New command to install Tempest's plugins in rally verify  https://review.openstack.org/240042
21:26 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:39 aix joined #openstack-rally
21:40 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
21:40 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:07 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:24 Aish joined #openstack-rally
22:48 mwagner joined #openstack-rally
23:02 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
23:13 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:56 dmorita joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary