Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-01-27

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:11 Aish joined #openstack-rally
00:14 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:17 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:19 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
00:20 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:22 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:25 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
00:31 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:34 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:37 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:40 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:42 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:45 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:47 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:48 asti__ joined #openstack-rally
00:51 asti_ joined #openstack-rally
00:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Move "tempest concurrency" feature request to implemented  https://review.openstack.org/272294
00:52 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed openstack/rally: Default cinder to v2  https://review.openstack.org/272853
00:55 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
00:58 asti_ joined #openstack-rally
01:02 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
01:04 asti_ joined #openstack-rally
01:08 asti___ joined #openstack-rally
01:13 openstackgerrit li,chen proposed openstack/rally: Use new-style Python classes  https://review.openstack.org/267266
01:16 chenli joined #openstack-rally
01:34 Liuqing joined #openstack-rally
01:39 openstackgerrit Kyle Jorgensen proposed openstack/rally: Replace image['..'] with image.get('..', 0)  https://review.openstack.org/272865
01:39 boris-42 kjorgensen: thanks for patch
01:40 boris-42 kjorgensen: oh it is your first patch in OpenStack ;) nice
01:41 kjorgensen boris-42: haha yep, thanks!
01:42 kjorgensen so forgive me if I don't know all the steps so well :)
01:56 kjorgensen boris-42: when my change eventually gets merged, how does it get included in a release? Is it possible that it can be backported to an older tag? (for example 0.1.2)
01:59 bochi-michael joined #openstack-rally
02:09 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
02:15 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
02:24 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:48 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
02:48 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:50 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
02:58 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
03:05 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed openstack/rally: Default cinder to v2  https://review.openstack.org/272853
03:20 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
03:23 Aish joined #openstack-rally
04:19 chenli joined #openstack-rally
04:29 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
05:29 shausy joined #openstack-rally
05:32 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:12 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
06:18 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:30 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
07:14 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:20 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
07:26 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:27 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
07:48 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
07:59 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
08:02 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:13 tfreger1 joined #openstack-rally
08:19 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
08:23 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:36 shausy joined #openstack-rally
08:44 lewo Hi. I've modified the dockerfile in order to run a rally container in "batch" mode, ie without the need to manually go inside the container to run several commands. Would you be interested by this kind of PR?
08:49 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
08:55 amaretskiy1 joined #openstack-rally
09:31 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
09:37 shausy joined #openstack-rally
09:57 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:06 openstackgerrit Piyush Raman Srivastava proposed openstack/rally: Adds support for listing subnets, routers and floatingIPs to NetworkWrapper  https://review.openstack.org/272251
10:12 openstackgerrit Piyush Raman Srivastava proposed openstack/rally: Add list subnets/routers/FIPs to NetworkWrapper  https://review.openstack.org/272251
10:14 rook joined #openstack-rally
10:16 yfried_ boris-42: ping
10:17 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:32 boris-42 lewo: sounds interesting
10:33 boris-42 lewo: could you propose patch and we will see
10:33 boris-42 yfried_: hi
10:33 boris-42 yfried_: sorry I have a lot of internal stuff ( didn't update the spec however seems like everybody is aligned with thi
10:33 boris-42 yfried_: except that missing stuff
10:34 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:35 lewo boris-42, ok. I will propose patch in next few days to show you how it works
10:36 boris-42 lewo: great thank you
10:39 lewo left #openstack-rally
10:39 lewo joined #openstack-rally
10:44 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Custom labels for "Scenario Output" charts  https://review.openstack.org/272989
10:56 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Custom labels for "Scenario Output" charts  https://review.openstack.org/272989
10:56 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:01 rdas joined #openstack-rally
11:04 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:07 abhishekk joined #openstack-rally
11:08 abhishekk hi all, how to update rally to new version?
11:08 boris-42 abhishekk: just pull the code
11:08 boris-42 abhishekk: and reinstall it
11:08 abhishekk boris-42, ok thank you
11:09 abhishekk I have installed using wget command
11:09 abhishekk and its showing version 0.2.1~dev50
11:09 abhishekk is this the latest one?
11:11 abhishekk wget -q -O- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/rally/master/install_rally.sh | bash
11:11 boris-42 abhishekk: nono
11:11 boris-42 abhishekk: you can just run "python setup.py install"
11:11 boris-42 abhishekk: otherwise that script will drop your DB
11:11 abhishekk boris-42 ok
11:12 abhishekk boris-42: let me try, thank you
11:15 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:15 abhishekk borris-42: after running setup.py when I check rally version then its showing >>> 0.2.1~dev50
11:15 abhishekk is this correct?
11:16 boris-42 abhishekk: yep seems like ok
11:16 boris-42 abhishekk: it says that it's version 0.2.0 + 50 commits
11:16 abhishekk ok, then https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1538341 in this bug its mentioned upgrading to 1.2.0, how to upgrade to 1.2.0???
11:17 openstack Launchpad bug 1538341 in Rally "Error in logic to retrieve image details in image_valid_on_flavor" [Undecided,Confirmed]
11:17 boris-42 abhishekk: this is not yet merged in upstream
11:17 boris-42 abhishekk: fix for it
11:18 boris-42 abhishekk: here is fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272865/
11:18 abhishekk boris-42: ohh, thank you
11:20 andreykurilin btw, it looks like description of the report is wrong. we don't have 1.2.0 release yet :)
11:21 anevenchannyy joined #openstack-rally
11:21 rdas joined #openstack-rally
11:22 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
11:25 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:28 yfried_ boris-42: amaretskiy1: andreykurilin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1510175
11:28 openstack Launchpad bug 1510175 in Rally "Rally task detailed 95%ile Response Times different from HTML graphics report" [Low,Triaged]
11:28 yfried_ how come this is set to LOW?
11:30 amaretskiy1 yfried_: importance is already set to Low
11:30 amaretskiy1 yfried_: oh I understood your question
11:31 yfried_ amaretskiy1: IMO inconsistent reports are a big issue
11:31 yfried_ amaretskiy1: how can you tell people to use Rally if you can't stand behind its output?
11:31 amaretskiy1 yfried_: yes this is inconsistent is some cases
11:31 andreykurilin yfried_: I don't know, why I put LOW priority :)
11:31 amaretskiy1 yfried_: however the cause of the problem is clear - reports are generated differently
11:32 yfried_ andreykurilin: amaretskiy1: boris-42: changed the importance
11:33 amaretskiy1 yfried_: I think that status "low" is reasonable because we will switch "detailed" report to the same algo later, and the issue is actually not critical (the difference in calculation is usually small)
11:33 yfried_ amaretskiy1: I disagree.
11:34 yfried_ amaretskiy1: if you are saying this will be fixed soon, that's a different issue. But if you are looking to get people to use Rally, and they wonder why they get different results when they only change the format, you won't get very far
11:37 andreykurilin amaretskiy1: I agreed with yfried_. We need to display the equal info across all reports(html, console and etc)
11:37 yfried_ andreykurilin: tnx
11:38 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
11:39 amaretskiy1 yfried_ andreykurilin: I also agreed with this, absolutely :) Th only question is an order of features/fixes to implement
11:40 yfried_ amaretskiy1: now that it's officially high prio, it's part of the discussion. previously it wasn't
11:41 amaretskiy1 yfried_: great :)
11:44 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
11:55 ikhudoshyn_ joined #openstack-rally
11:55 rdas joined #openstack-rally
11:59 josdotso joined #openstack-rally
12:25 aix joined #openstack-rally
12:44 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
12:44 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add Image content upload context  https://review.openstack.org/266531
12:52 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
12:57 boris-42 yfried_: amaretskiy1 please take a look at this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272773/
12:57 boris-42 just image change
12:58 amaretskiy1 looking......
13:03 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
13:19 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
13:32 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
13:42 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Remove deprecated rally.common.log  https://review.openstack.org/273047
13:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Update plugin image in documentation  https://review.openstack.org/272773
13:54 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Add note about the fact that Rally won't use testtools' assertions  https://review.openstack.org/263759
13:55 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Add note about the fact that Rally won't use testtools' assertions  https://review.openstack.org/263759
13:57 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
14:03 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
14:10 rook joined #openstack-rally
14:12 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:12 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
14:14 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add note about the fact that Rally won't use testtools' assertions  https://review.openstack.org/263759
14:18 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/272828
14:24 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
14:40 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Add note about the fact that Rally won't use testtools' assertions  https://review.openstack.org/263759
14:43 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:53 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
14:58 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add Image content upload context  https://review.openstack.org/266531
14:59 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
15:05 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:23 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add Image content upload context  https://review.openstack.org/266531
15:27 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
15:28 marcoceppi joined #openstack-rally
15:33 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
15:35 tosky joined #openstack-rally
15:36 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
15:38 baker joined #openstack-rally
16:00 Aish joined #openstack-rally
16:22 phd2 joined #openstack-rally
16:24 phd2 joined #openstack-rally
16:28 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
16:44 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
16:56 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
17:02 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
17:08 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
17:17 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
17:37 smurke Does rally work as a service when install in devstack as a plugin ?
17:38 smurke I was not able to find rally process in my screens (devstack)
17:49 psd joined #openstack-rally
17:57 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:59 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:00 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
18:04 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
18:08 stevelle joined #openstack-rally
18:10 Aish joined #openstack-rally
18:18 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
18:27 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add Image content upload context  https://review.openstack.org/266531
18:29 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
18:32 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed openstack/rally: Default cinder to v2  https://review.openstack.org/272853
18:41 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:45 josdotso joined #openstack-rally
19:00 kjorgensen Hello, I'm looking for guidance to understand why a test failed on my patch. See my comment here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272865/1/rally/task/validation.py
19:00 kjorgensen any insight would be appreciated
19:08 stpierre kjorgensen: that's not how .get() works
19:08 stpierre if the key is in the dict, but it is explicitly None, then None will be returned
19:09 kjorgensen Ah I see
19:09 stpierre http://www.fpaste.org/315425/45392177/
19:10 kjorgensen thanks
19:17 harshs joined #openstack-rally
19:25 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:47 asti joined #openstack-rally
19:47 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
19:55 yfried joined #openstack-rally
20:04 yfried joined #openstack-rally
20:09 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
20:19 yfried joined #openstack-rally
20:26 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
20:40 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
20:44 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
21:07 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
21:18 openstackgerrit Kyle Jorgensen proposed openstack/rally: Replace image['..'] with image.get('..')  https://review.openstack.org/272865
21:19 harshs joined #openstack-rally
21:22 baker joined #openstack-rally
21:32 asti joined #openstack-rally
21:35 yfried joined #openstack-rally
21:35 kjorgensen Hi all, I was just wondering, is there any process for backporting changes to a previous/existing tag? Or do bug fixes just get included in a future release?
21:57 harshs joined #openstack-rally
21:58 harshs left #openstack-rally
22:14 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:32 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:43 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
22:50 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:50 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:54 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
23:02 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
23:04 e0ne_ joined #openstack-rally
23:04 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
23:04 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
23:07 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:08 davidlenwell joined #openstack-rally
23:14 baker joined #openstack-rally
23:20 baker joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary