Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-02-02

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:06 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
00:09 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
00:11 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
00:37 rook-laptop joined #openstack-rally
00:38 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:45 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
00:55 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix typo  https://review.openstack.org/274478
00:58 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add heat siege workload scenario  https://review.openstack.org/272510
01:12 baker joined #openstack-rally
01:18 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
01:21 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
01:24 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
01:25 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
01:25 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
01:29 openstackgerrit li,chen proposed openstack/rally: Use new-style Python classes  https://review.openstack.org/267266
01:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/274925
01:33 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
01:35 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
01:47 baohua joined #openstack-rally
02:03 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:04 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
02:13 openstackgerrit li,chen proposed openstack/rally: Use new-style Python classes  https://review.openstack.org/267266
02:26 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:29 openstackgerrit Julian Edwards proposed openstack/rally: Make Rally cope with unversioned keystone URL  https://review.openstack.org/274977
02:56 redixin joined #openstack-rally
02:57 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add Cinder v1 test to gate  https://review.openstack.org/274679
02:58 openstackgerrit li,chen proposed openstack/rally: Use new-style Python classes  https://review.openstack.org/267266
02:59 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:06 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:08 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
03:13 openstackgerrit Julian Edwards proposed openstack/rally: Make Rally cope with unversioned keystone URL  https://review.openstack.org/274977
03:16 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:26 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
03:42 openstackgerrit li,chen proposed openstack/rally: Use new-style Python classes  https://review.openstack.org/267266
03:44 ylobankov joined #openstack-rally
04:10 winston-d_ joined #openstack-rally
04:22 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:30 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
04:47 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
05:01 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
05:04 harshs joined #openstack-rally
05:10 harshs_ joined #openstack-rally
05:20 psuriset_ joined #openstack-rally
05:24 _lnk_ joined #openstack-rally
05:35 Aish joined #openstack-rally
05:45 harshs joined #openstack-rally
05:50 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:22 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
06:33 openstackgerrit Bo Chi proposed openstack/rally: Use dict and set comprehension instead of using dict() and set()  https://review.openstack.org/273449
06:35 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:43 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
06:43 baohua joined #openstack-rally
07:25 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:47 yfried joined #openstack-rally
07:52 yfried joined #openstack-rally
08:00 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
08:17 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
08:22 baohua dear rally experts, i would like to welcome to review a recent patch, to add the kuryr plugin for rally and some basic scenarios. thanks! https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274014/
08:38 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:59 boris-42 baohua: thank you for patch
09:03 rdas_ joined #openstack-rally
09:28 _lnk_ joined #openstack-rally
09:34 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
09:46 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
10:01 saurabh___ joined #openstack-rally
10:02 saurabh___ Hi there, is there any rally scenario which created network of type vlan?
10:03 saurabh___ as creation of vlan network type is only admin property, and rally creates non-admin users to create network and other resources on execution
10:05 saurabh___ boris-42: ^^^
10:05 mvk joined #openstack-rally
10:06 saurabh___ ikhudoshyn: ^^^
10:06 amaretskiy saurabh___: hi. it seems that the only place where rally deals with vlans out-of-the-box in fuel env creation https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/fuel/utils.py#L47-L50
10:12 saurabh___ amaretskiy: Thanks, will take a look
10:15 amaretskiy saurabh___: afaik, you actually configure tenant networks while creating cloud - in example above there is a Fuel environment setup (by rally) with vlan-based tenant networking
10:16 amaretskiy saurabh___: and creating tenant networks is common task for rally - there is a context https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/network/networks.py
10:17 amaretskiy saurabh___: wrapper method - https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/wrappers/network.py#L92
10:17 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
10:18 amaretskiy saurabh___: and method in neutron utils https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/neutron/utils.py#L86
10:37 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
10:57 tosky joined #openstack-rally
11:00 ikhudoshyn rvasilets: amaretskiy andreykurilin guys, since keystone v3 api apocalypse is deferred I believe we should turn on all disbled scenarios in the gate job https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274813/
11:00 rvasilets done
11:00 ikhudoshyn tnx)
11:02 rvasilets We should made some work to be prepare for the next Sean Dague surprise)
11:03 ikhudoshyn yep I'm thinking about it. I started some work to have a dedicated v2 api job
11:03 rvasilets Or wrote to dependencies of Rally the name Sean=)
11:03 rvasilets Sean's good mood=)
11:03 ikhudoshyn we actually have it)
11:04 rvasilets We don't know what he will want to do next time. For example to switch to v1=)
11:05 ikhudoshyn any ideas ? ,)
11:06 rvasilets Yair's spec and Andrey's api_context patch possibly)
11:07 ikhudoshyn https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235360/ this one?
11:07 ikhudoshyn Andrey actually asked me to pick it up
11:07 ikhudoshyn I'll do eventually
11:20 yfried joined #openstack-rally
11:22 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
11:27 rdas joined #openstack-rally
11:39 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
11:45 abalutoiu hello, anyone here?
11:45 ikhudoshyn hi abalutoiu
11:48 abalutoiu question about rally load distribution, if I start a test for example Nova boot and delete with 20 instances and 2 tenants with 2 users each, will the load be distributed across the tenants and users? I mean will each tenant receive 10 instances to spawn, 5 for each user?
11:50 amaretskiy abalutoiu: рш
11:50 amaretskiy abalutoiu: *hi
11:50 amaretskiy sorry :)
11:50 abalutoiu hi :)
11:51 amaretskiy abalutoiu: 2 tenants with 2 users - means you will have 2 tenants and 4 users
11:51 amaretskiy so tenant 1 + 2 users and tenant 2 + 2 users
11:51 abalutoiu yeah
11:51 amaretskiy times: 20 - so you will run scenario 20 times
11:52 amaretskiy each scenario instance will choose random user from 4 users
11:52 amaretskiy and random tenant (first) from 2 tenants and then, of course, one of 2 users of this tenant
11:53 amaretskiy so there will be 4 users at all, without relation of how many iterations you will run
11:53 amaretskiy you specify "times: 20" for runner
11:53 amaretskiy so scenario will be run 20 times
11:53 amaretskiy but
11:53 amaretskiy you specify tenants and users in CONTEXT
11:55 amaretskiy context means that some resources are created/prepared BEFORE any iteration start, and cleanup of these resources is run AFTER all iteration (no matter how many) are finished
11:56 amaretskiy abalutoiu: is everything clear? :)
11:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [CI]Restore disabled scenarios in Rally gate job  https://review.openstack.org/274813
11:59 abalutoiu amaretskiy: my question would be then: everytime the scenario will run, it will chose a random tenant/user? can I specify something like 10 instances / tenant?
11:59 rvasilets yes
11:59 rvasilets But what you mean under "instances"?
11:59 amaretskiy abalutoiu: >> everytime the scenario will run, it will chose a random tenant/user   <--- YES
12:01 abalutoiu for example in this test: http://paste.openstack.org/show/485721/
12:01 abalutoiu can I put a specific number of instances per tenant/user?
12:02 abalutoiu I would like to have a uniformly distributed load per tenant/user
12:03 amaretskiy abalutoiu: >> can I specify something like 10 instances / tenant?    <--- you can set tenants: 2 and times: 20 (as this is now) and concurrency: 20 (with constant runner) - this means that 20 scenarios will run AT THE SAME TIME (20 threads) and they will use 2 tennats so there will be APPROXIMATELY 10 scenarios for 1 tenant
12:04 abalutoiu amaretskiy: thanks, that's what I wanted :)
12:05 rvasilets can I put a specific number of instances per tenant/user? <- No, there is no such option in scenario. Maybe you've interested in such scenario? https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/nova/servers.py#L109
12:06 rvasilets there is option count
12:06 rvasilets Also you may use servers context https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/nova/servers.py#L56
12:07 rvasilets there is an option servers per tenant
12:07 rvasilets This will create numbers of servers per tenant once before scenario start
12:07 rvasilets abalutoiu, ^
12:09 rvasilets this will help you to distribute load before scenario
12:10 rvasilets also randomly choice of user guarantee uniform distribution among users
12:10 rvasilets and therefore through tenants
12:11 abalutoiu rvasilets: thanks for the help, I didn't notice that option :)
12:12 rvasilets Not at all)
12:19 openstackgerrit Bo Chi proposed openstack/rally: Use dict and set comprehension instead of using dict() and set()  https://review.openstack.org/273449
12:38 ptoohill joined #openstack-rally
12:45 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
12:46 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:58 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
13:00 logan- joined #openstack-rally
13:01 tosky joined #openstack-rally
13:07 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:07 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
13:08 openstackgerrit Tom Patzig proposed openstack/rally: Allow static fip in VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete  https://review.openstack.org/271704
13:29 davidlenwell joined #openstack-rally
13:30 rvasilets andreykurilin, amaretskiy, lets merge this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272865/7
13:53 gubouvier joined #openstack-rally
14:01 redixin joined #openstack-rally
14:03 MaxPC1 joined #openstack-rally
14:04 MaxPC1 joined #openstack-rally
14:15 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
14:16 MaxPC2 joined #openstack-rally
14:32 rmart04_ joined #openstack-rally
14:39 rook-laptop joined #openstack-rally
14:41 absubram joined #openstack-rally
14:42 absubram_ joined #openstack-rally
14:46 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
14:48 spyderdyne joined #openstack-rally
14:48 spyderdyne left #openstack-rally
14:49 arnoldje joined #openstack-rally
14:59 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
15:07 ylobankov joined #openstack-rally
15:10 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
15:12 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
15:19 baker joined #openstack-rally
15:33 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
15:37 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Fix unit tests for authenticate scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/275276
15:44 MaxPC2 joined #openstack-rally
15:45 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
15:46 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
15:54 MaxPC1 joined #openstack-rally
16:06 redixin joined #openstack-rally
16:13 ylobankov joined #openstack-rally
16:18 Aish joined #openstack-rally
16:42 harshs joined #openstack-rally
16:43 openstackgerrit Ross Martyn proposed openstack/rally: Refactored authenticate.py to remove atomic actions from loops when performing multiple repititions.  https://review.openstack.org/274882
16:48 ylobankov joined #openstack-rally
16:54 mvk joined #openstack-rally
17:06 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
17:16 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
17:28 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
17:32 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
17:35 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Move OpenStack cleanup utils out of context  https://review.openstack.org/272637
17:35 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Add name() to ResourceManager  https://review.openstack.org/272638
17:35 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add task_id argument to name_matches_object  https://review.openstack.org/272639
17:35 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add ability to specify superclass for cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/275340
17:38 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
18:09 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:13 stevelle left #openstack-rally
18:15 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:17 harshs joined #openstack-rally
18:19 Aish joined #openstack-rally
18:19 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
18:23 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:46 absubram joined #openstack-rally
18:46 rmart04 joined #openstack-rally
18:54 kjorgensen rvasilets, amaretskiy: thanks for helping 'recheck' my review =)
19:04 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:05 fsopenstack joined #openstack-rally
19:10 itsuugo_ joined #openstack-rally
19:14 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
19:15 kbyrne joined #openstack-rally
19:15 harshs joined #openstack-rally
19:16 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
19:18 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
19:25 redixin joined #openstack-rally
19:30 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix unit tests for authenticate scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/275276
19:48 mvk_ joined #openstack-rally
19:59 harshs joined #openstack-rally
20:01 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
20:08 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Don't create new image when image already exists  https://review.openstack.org/274397
20:17 fsopenstack joined #openstack-rally
20:29 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Don't create new image when image already exists  https://review.openstack.org/274397
20:29 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Ensure image['..'] does not throw KeyError  https://review.openstack.org/272865
20:36 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Don't create new flavor when flavor already exists  https://review.openstack.org/274483
20:47 fsopenstack joined #openstack-rally
20:51 openstackgerrit Ross Martyn proposed openstack/rally: Refactored authenticate.py to remove atomic actions from loops when performing multiple repititions.  https://review.openstack.org/274882
20:58 madhu_ak joined #openstack-rally
20:58 agrebennikov joined #openstack-rally
20:59 agrebennikov boris-42,
20:59 agrebennikov here?
20:59 boris-42 agrebennikov: hi there
20:59 boris-42 stpierre: ^
20:59 boris-42 stpierre: he has some issues with existing_network context
21:01 Aish joined #openstack-rally
21:02 baker joined #openstack-rally
21:02 agrebennikov joined #openstack-rally
21:09 fsopenstack joined #openstack-rally
21:51 baker joined #openstack-rally
21:52 yfried joined #openstack-rally
22:10 dspano joined #openstack-rally
22:13 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
22:24 itlinux joined #openstack-rally
22:28 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add wrapper for Glance API versions  https://review.openstack.org/264964
22:31 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:44 itlinux_ joined #openstack-rally
22:55 itlinux joined #openstack-rally
23:19 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
23:24 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:26 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
23:41 rook-laptop joined #openstack-rally
23:47 baker joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary