Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-06-21

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:03 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:34 sshnaidm joined #openstack-rally
00:53 yamamot__ joined #openstack-rally
01:49 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:49 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
01:53 yanyanhu joined #openstack-rally
02:00 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
03:04 caowei joined #openstack-rally
03:29 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
03:32 dave-mccowan joined #openstack-rally
03:42 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:52 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:03 openstackgerrit lvfm proposed openstack/rally: Modify nested_level from dict to integer.  https://review.openstack.org/331934
04:04 itlinux joined #openstack-rally
04:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:45 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:46 shausy joined #openstack-rally
05:05 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
05:32 caowei joined #openstack-rally
05:38 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
05:41 yamamot__ joined #openstack-rally
05:44 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:56 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
05:57 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
06:27 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
06:28 athinkingmeat joined #openstack-rally
06:31 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
06:41 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:52 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
07:02 openstackgerrit lvfm proposed openstack/rally: Modify nested_level from dict to integer  https://review.openstack.org/331934
07:43 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
07:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:10 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:50 permalac joined #openstack-rally
08:58 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
09:05 openstackgerrit lvfm proposed openstack/rally: Stopping server is redundant before cold-migrating server  https://review.openstack.org/332021
09:08 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
09:18 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
09:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:43 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
10:27 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:33 openstackgerrit Sonali Pitre proposed openstack/rally: Adds Rally support for Barbican scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/329432
10:47 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
11:18 abalutoiu_ joined #openstack-rally
11:22 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
11:46 caowei joined #openstack-rally
11:49 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
11:52 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
11:54 mvk_ joined #openstack-rally
12:11 dave-mccowan joined #openstack-rally
12:12 maeca1 joined #openstack-rally
12:33 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Ensure consistent naming of sample scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/330536
12:45 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
13:03 caowei joined #openstack-rally
13:19 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
13:31 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:36 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:36 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: [CI]Disable failing tests for Neutron with existing users  https://review.openstack.org/332144
13:39 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:42 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
13:46 sshnaidm_ joined #openstack-rally
13:47 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:48 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
13:48 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
13:50 abalutoiu__ joined #openstack-rally
13:51 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
14:08 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
14:15 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
14:42 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
14:50 zackf joined #openstack-rally
14:53 raddaoui joined #openstack-rally
15:00 KevinE joined #openstack-rally
15:01 KevinE joined #openstack-rally
15:03 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
15:18 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
15:26 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Fix 'existing_users' context against keystone v3  https://review.openstack.org/332204
15:26 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:31 zackf joined #openstack-rally
15:31 caowei joined #openstack-rally
15:52 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
16:06 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is being restarted now to apply an emergency security-related configuration change
16:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [CI]Disable failing tests for Neutron with existing users  https://review.openstack.org/332144
16:12 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
16:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Modify nested_level from dict to integer  https://review.openstack.org/331934
16:32 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
16:40 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
16:48 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
16:53 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
16:56 zackf joined #openstack-rally
16:59 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Fix 'existing_users' context against keystone v3  https://review.openstack.org/332204
17:06 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Ensure consistent naming of sample scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/330536
17:40 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
17:49 KevinE so.. how can I make rally install iperf by default?
17:52 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
18:05 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:16 KevinE andreykurilin: Do you know how you're supposed to install software with a rally installation that's not through pip?
18:19 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:25 rook KevinE you mean iperf in the guest?
18:25 rook KevinE: Why not just use metadata to instruct the guest to install iperf?
18:26 rook That is how I have done things in the past.
18:27 KevinE rook: I'm trying to merge up some iperf rally tests, but the old repo I'm working with just has the binary file sitting as a source file
18:27 rook oh, well then I dunno...
18:27 KevinE rook: I don't know how to go about getting it to install somewhere (ideally like /usr/bin) with the rally installation
18:28 rook I don't understand why the machine kicking off rally should ihave iperf installed
18:28 KevinE rook: I guess it would just be for this suite of tests I'd like to merge. what's another way for me to do it?
18:31 KevinE rook: or, why would it be bad for the machine to have iperf?
18:31 rook KevinE it is unnecessary.
18:32 rook KevinE You want the _instances_ to have iperf installed, not the Rally machine.
18:32 rook IMHO. I might be misunderstanding you
18:33 KevinE rook: No I think you're getting it, but I was told that it would probably be cleaner to have iperf on the rally machine, then push it directly to the base instances/images. just to keep them clean, and to keep problems out of the actual image
18:33 M00nr41n joined #openstack-rally
18:34 KevinE rook: If I'm not making sense let me know, I'm not well versed in this(anything)
18:50 rook so, you are saying to ship the binary, then have Rally scp it to the guest ?
18:51 rook KevinE: ^^
18:51 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
18:51 KevinE rook: that's the impression I'm under yeah, I don't know how that looks in practice yet. what do you think about it
18:52 KevinE rook: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326701/ you can look at the tests if you like, this is my little working directory
19:05 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
19:14 rook From the patchset seems like the mechanism put into place is to ship the binary...
19:15 rook Not sure they want to maintain that in the Rally repo... but that would be a better question for boris-42
19:15 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
19:27 permalac_ joined #openstack-rally
19:27 jrcloud joined #openstack-rally
19:28 e0ne_ joined #openstack-rally
19:28 andreykurilin__ KevinE rook: we(rally team) do not want to maintain binaries in rally repo. Also, there is no way to add package requirements to rally except python packages. I see only one way for iperf: accept a path to iperf as a scenario or context argument
19:29 rook andreykurilin I would agree not to ship it
19:30 rook I would suggest to install it into the guest with --user-data file-to-install-fio
19:30 andreykurilin__ + we can add iperf to rally container, but, as I said,  not in rally python package itself
19:31 rook The only thing that ^^ assumes is that you have a image that doesn't require a tty
19:31 rook I have a centos image prepped that I use for this.
19:32 KevinE sooo just make a custom image to spin up for these iperf tests?
19:35 cu5 joined #openstack-rally
19:38 KevinE andreykurilin__: how about making the installation of iperf as a dependency ?
19:40 dave-mccowan joined #openstack-rally
19:41 andreykurilin__ KevinE: we don't have a mechanism to do it. install_rally.sh script installs packages which are required for rally Python dependences.
19:43 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
19:45 dave-mcc_ joined #openstack-rally
19:45 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
19:50 rook imho KevinE your best bet is to have Rally utilize user-data in the launching of the guest, and pass a file instructing the guest to install fio.. The only possible issue is, clouds that do not have external access...
20:01 KevinE rook: andreykurilin__ what would happen if I just set the src path to {{iperf-path}} and went that route for merging, just let the user deal with it?
20:12 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
20:20 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
20:46 Guest20932 joined #openstack-rally
21:30 KevinE_ joined #openstack-rally
21:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Ensure consistent naming of sample scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/330536
22:47 KevinE joined #openstack-rally
23:08 KevinE joined #openstack-rally
23:14 itlinux joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary