Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-08-11

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:08 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:03 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
01:09 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:20 yanyanhu joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
02:12 maeca1 joined #openstack-rally
02:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove deprecated log module  https://review.openstack.org/352935
03:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Update requirements  https://review.openstack.org/353453
03:13 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:17 zackf joined #openstack-rally
03:49 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
03:51 luzC joined #openstack-rally
03:51 coolsvap joined #openstack-rally
03:57 sshnaidm|afk joined #openstack-rally
04:15 shausy joined #openstack-rally
04:16 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:17 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
05:29 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
05:31 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:44 serverascode_ joined #openstack-rally
05:44 meteorfox_ joined #openstack-rally
05:44 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
05:48 bapalm_ joined #openstack-rally
05:48 njohnston_ joined #openstack-rally
05:48 mvk joined #openstack-rally
05:56 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:38 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
06:44 Noam joined #openstack-rally
06:45 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
06:45 Noam Hi rally dev's
06:47 Noam Is there a way/plugin to run rally scenarios with direct port?
06:53 tesseract- joined #openstack-rally
07:09 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
07:38 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Refactoring of the code  https://review.openstack.org/353340
07:41 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Refactoring of the code  https://review.openstack.org/353340
07:45 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:09 manikanta joined #openstack-rally
08:10 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
08:31 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
08:34 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
08:36 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
08:39 rvasilets_ Noam, What's mean direct port?
08:39 rvasilets_ port for what
08:39 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:43 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:05 abehl joined #openstack-rally
09:27 amitkqed joined #openstack-rally
09:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Reports] Expand menu if there is only one menu group  https://review.openstack.org/351770
09:52 mvk joined #openstack-rally
09:56 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:56 mvk joined #openstack-rally
10:01 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:01 * mvk is away: Auto-away after 5 mins idle (gone at 11th Aug, 12:01:25)
10:07 * mvk returns (Auto-away after 5 mins idle [11m 4s]) (total away time: 11m 4s)
10:08 mvk joined #openstack-rally
10:22 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of HttpRequests scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/353958
10:40 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Deprecating 'tests-file' and 'xfails-file' args  https://review.openstack.org/352795
11:09 zackf joined #openstack-rally
11:16 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
11:28 amitkqed joined #openstack-rally
12:02 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:15 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:20 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:20 sshnaidm joined #openstack-rally
12:35 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:38 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
12:40 mvk joined #openstack-rally
12:54 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:09 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:11 mvk joined #openstack-rally
13:12 ylobankov joined #openstack-rally
13:27 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
13:34 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
13:43 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:43 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
13:44 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:49 zackf joined #openstack-rally
13:53 mvk joined #openstack-rally
13:56 matthewli_ joined #openstack-rally
13:56 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: WIP! [Doc][Reports] New documentation chapter about HTML reports  https://review.openstack.org/354090
13:57 haukebruno joined #openstack-rally
13:59 maeca1 joined #openstack-rally
13:59 haukebruno hi there. does someone have a hint for running rally inside a multiregion setting? I want to run tests against RegionOne, set up everything with my admin openrc file (including OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne), but as I start some cinder tasks, I got error because rally seems to use the RegionTwo cinder endpoint
14:08 amaretskiy haukebruno: region is saved in rally deployment, in the moment of its creation. You can check its value with command `rally deployment config'
14:09 haukebruno amaretskiy, it is set correctly to RegionOne :/
14:09 amaretskiy haukebruno: please make a paste with the error
14:14 haukebruno amaretskiy, http://pastebin.com/93vjKyGz
14:14 haukebruno reg02 is used by the client, but rally itself points to reg01
14:15 haukebruno amaretskiy, the error itself I can understand, because in reg02 we do not have any cinder-volume host within AZ nova, but in reg01 we have. my general problem is, that rally - or maybe the openstack client? - uses the reg02 endpoint instead of reg01
14:17 amaretskiy what does `openstack catalog show cinder' outputs?
14:18 amaretskiy haukebruno: and what is an output of `echo $OS_REGION_NAME' ?
14:23 alexchadin rvasilets_: ping
14:28 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of Dummy scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/353340
14:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Verify] Deprecating 'tests-file' and 'xfails-file' args  https://review.openstack.org/352795
14:47 haukebruno amaretskiy, http://pastebin.com/M845WWwq for the catalog output
14:47 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
14:47 haukebruno + echo $OS_REGION_NAME points to reg01
14:48 amaretskiy rvasilets andreykurilin ^
14:48 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of HttpRequests scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/353958
14:50 haukebruno amaretskiy, I am not really sure whether it is a problem of rally or just of our stack. some 'openstack network ...' commands also don't work in reg01 because they'll use the reg02 endpoints. all the other stuff for nova, cinder, glance etc. works on the same box
14:50 rvasilets_ alexchadin, pong
14:50 andreykurilin haukebruno: hi! can you modify the code of rally to check one my idea?)
14:51 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
14:51 haukebruno andreykurilin, well I can try to hack some stuff the dirty way into the scripts :p
14:51 alexchadin rvasilets_: could I discuss with you your latest review on watcher context?
14:51 rvasilets_ alexchadin, of cause
14:51 alexchadin rvasilets_: audit template isn't a tenant resource
14:52 alexchadin rvasilets_: It is available only for admin
14:52 alexchadin rvasilets_: That's why I don't iterate through tenants
14:52 alexchadin rvasilets_: cause I sometimes discuss it already with someone of rally core
14:52 andreykurilin haukebruno: ok. it looks like we do not transmit region_name to cinderclient(lol) - https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py#L401 . Try to add additional argument to initialization `region_name=self.credential.region_name`
14:53 alexchadin rvasilets_: there were problems when I used users and tenants within this context
14:53 rvasilets_ alexchadin, okey thus there is a bug in resources.py
14:54 andreykurilin haukebruno: if it helps for your case, we will make change to rally master
14:54 alexchadin bug in my PS?
14:54 alexchadin could you point it out?
14:54 rvasilets_ alexchadin, https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/cleanup/resources.py#L757
14:55 alexchadin ah, seems that I should remove tenant_resource flag
14:55 alexchadin ok, well
14:56 alexchadin can I ignore then comments in audit_templates.py?
14:56 rvasilets_ alexchadin, looks like you need something like that https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/cleanup/resources.py#L798
14:56 alexchadin yes!
14:56 alexchadin will try to use
14:57 rvasilets_ alexchadin, no, because there is a comment about scale ability of this context
14:57 rvasilets_ its scalable as much as a human can write by hand
14:57 alexchadin I understand
14:58 alexchadin What can you propose?
14:59 rvasilets_ alexchadin, to do as in other contexts. To initialize audit_template by the same config
14:59 rvasilets_ or to choose from the set of available
14:59 haukebruno sorry for asking, I am not a coding guy, but: after changed the osclients.py file, should I have to do _something_ to update the osclients.pyc file?
15:00 andreykurilin haukebruno: no, you don't need to modify it
15:00 rvasilets_ alexchadin, Does the goal_id and strategy_id should be unique?
15:01 rvasilets_ for audit_template
15:01 alexchadin yes
15:01 haukebruno andreykurilin, then the addition seems to not work
15:02 andreykurilin :(
15:02 andreykurilin haukebruno: ok, are you sure that you modify the correct(installed) rally file?
15:02 haukebruno just to make that I didn't do some bullshit -> http://pastebin.com/aeU7E0DZ
15:03 alexchadin rvasilets_: what do you mean speaking about the same config?
15:03 alexchadin rvasilets_: sorry, but I'm little misunderstanding
15:03 haukebruno andreykurilin, I modified /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rally/osclients.py + also /root/rally.git/rally/osclients.py just for being safe
15:03 andreykurilin ok
15:03 andreykurilin :(
15:03 rvasilets_ alexchadin, What if I create two audit_templates with different name but the same goal and strategy id?
15:04 rvasilets_ alexchadin, I mean What if I want to create 100,1000,1000000 audit templates?)
15:04 rvasilets_ What will you do?
15:04 alexchadin rvasilets_: I think, there won't be problem with it
15:05 alexchadin hm
15:05 rvasilets_ alexchadin, isn't it a problem that if I want to create 1000 audit_templates then I need to specify 1000 ids for goal and strategy in task config?)
15:06 andreykurilin haukebruno: does cinder cli work in your case?
15:06 rvasilets_ alexchadin, So the answer on "What if I create two audit_templates with different name but the same goal and strategy id"  is  there won't be problem with it ?
15:08 alexchadin rvasilets_: If you want create 1000 audit templates, you can use create-audit-template-and-delete scenario, where you need to specify only 1 goal and 1 strategy
15:08 haukebruno andreykurilin, yes. both 'cinder list --all-tenants' and 'openstack volume list --all-projects' work + show the correct volumes of reg01
15:09 rvasilets_ alexchadin, No. I want to create 1000 audit_template in context for my own purpose
15:10 alexchadin 1000 different audit templates?
15:10 rvasilets_ alexchadin, we can't use scenario to create resources for my own scenario
15:10 alexchadin with different goals and strategies?
15:10 rvasilets_ alexchadin, with different goals and strategies? - No, 1000 audit_templates
15:11 rvasilets_ If we can to create audit_templates with the same strategy and goal then ok
15:11 alexchadin yes, we can
15:11 rvasilets_ if no then maybe the name will make them unique
15:11 alexchadin ah
15:11 alexchadin I see what you meant "alexchadin, Does the goal_id and strategy_id should be unique?"
15:12 alexchadin yes, we can create audit template with the same goals and strategies
15:12 andreykurilin haukebruno: so it is strange
15:12 alexchadin this templates should have different names?
15:12 alexchadin oups
15:12 alexchadin without "?"
15:13 alexchadin rvasilets_: sorry for misunderstanding
15:15 andreykurilin haukebruno:let's try another idea:)
15:15 haukebruno andreykurilin, not sure if it helps you, but: if I change 'region_name=self.credential.region_name)' to 'region_name='reg01')' in row 196 it works :p
15:15 haukebruno osclients.py btw
15:15 andreykurilin O_O
15:15 rvasilets_ alexchadin, So everything is ok?)
15:16 alexchadin rvasilets_: I think, it's ok with scalable:)
15:17 andreykurilin haukebruno: can you add somewhere "print(self.credential.region_name)" ? maybe before initialization of cinderclient
15:17 alexchadin rvasilets_: thank you for your review!
15:18 rvasilets_ alexchadin, possible snippet http://paste.openstack.org/show/554204/
15:19 haukebruno andreykurilin, before the "@configure" stuff?
15:19 rvasilets_ alexchadin, the first line is the key here, other just copy-paste)
15:19 andreykurilin no no
15:19 andreykurilin haukebruno: for example here https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py#L400
15:20 alexchadin rvasilets_: ok, I will try to use it tomorrow
15:20 andreykurilin haukebruno: you can add something like `print("REGION_NAME = %s" % self.credential.region_name)`. it will make printed message more visable
15:21 haukebruno andreykurilin, should the output be visible without --debug?
15:21 andreykurilin yes
15:22 haukebruno REGION_NAME = None
15:22 haukebruno interesting I guess
15:22 andreykurilin haukebruno: I expected this:)
15:22 haukebruno andreykurilin, is that a good or a bad sign :p
15:23 andreykurilin haukebruno: From one point of view, it is bad sign - we had one more bug:) but from another - it looks like I know why there is None and how it can be fixed:)
15:25 andreykurilin haukebruno: If hardcode of your region is ok for you. I'll return to this issue at next week.
15:25 haukebruno \o/ for me the workaround with hardcoding reg01 will work, should I try to create a bug report?
15:25 haukebruno andreykurilin, yes of course. I am fine, thanks for your help so far
15:25 andreykurilin haukebruno: yes, create a bug report
15:26 andreykurilin haukebruno: btw, if you want or you know somebody how can contribute to Rally, I can tell how this issue can be fixed :)
15:27 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
15:28 haukebruno andreykurilin, generally I _want_, but I did never code in my live and I am not sure how that git and gerrit stuff works for the openstack or rally codebase :/
15:29 amaretskiy left #openstack-rally
15:48 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Fix ExistingCloud properties  https://review.openstack.org/320056
15:49 andreykurilin haukebruno: ok, so basics of git and gerrit are simple.
15:51 haukebruno andreykurilin, ok :) are you available tomorrow for some noob questions of mine regarding git, gerrit + the fix of that issue? I need to stop work for today in about 10 minutes (living in germany)
15:52 haukebruno I also created https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1612319 not sure if the information are fine or not
15:52 openstack Launchpad bug 1612319 in Rally "region support for cinder tests is missing" [Undecided,New]
15:52 andreykurilin haukebruno: lol, I want to leave my work place in 10 minutes too :)
15:52 andreykurilin haukebruno: see you tomorrow
15:52 haukebruno andreykurilin, cool thanks. have a nice evening \o/
15:52 andreykurilin thanks, you too
15:59 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
16:00 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
16:01 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
16:07 hockeynut greetings - I am looking to see if there is any work going on for Rally-as-a-service?  I think there are a couple of CRs in gerrit but not sure if anyone is actively working on it.
16:12 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
16:19 openstackgerrit Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Refactor DB shema for task results  https://review.openstack.org/297020
16:25 rook hockeynut: i hear that there is work on going for this.
16:25 rook I cannot remember the patchset link
16:26 hockeynut rook I see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336636/ and
16:26 hockeynut https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182245/
16:28 hockeynut one is a year old, one is a demo on how it could be implemented
16:28 hockeynut I'm just wondering if anyone is actively working on it and what its priority is.
16:34 rook hockeynut: yeah, i thought andreykurilin was, but maybe I have my hairs crossed.
16:51 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:01 andreykurilin__ rook hockeynut : amaretskiy is working on PoC. He already proposed a patch
17:01 rook ahhhhhh
17:01 rook andreykurilin__: i knew someone was looking at it!
17:02 andreykurilin__ I think we will discuss raas at next week
17:02 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
17:02 hockeynut excellent
17:02 andreykurilin__ And maybe some additional help/contribution will be needed
17:05 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
17:07 * hockeynut raises his hand :-)
17:13 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:17 andreykurilin__ Noted
17:17 andreykurilin__ Ok
17:20 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
17:21 andreykurilin__ hockeynut: btw, I had one patch which relates to RaaS and need update/rebase
17:22 andreykurilin__ Maybe you will be interested in finishing him
17:22 andreykurilin__ )
17:57 KevinE joined #openstack-rally
17:59 KevinE andreykurilin__: Are you around?
17:59 KevinE stpierre: Are you around?
18:02 andreykurilin__ A bit
18:11 stpierre KevinE: also a bit
18:11 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
18:28 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
18:34 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
19:04 mvk joined #openstack-rally
19:22 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Adding 'add-options' arg to `rally verify genconfig` cmd  https://review.openstack.org/352016
19:55 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:00 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
20:22 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:02 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:19 maeca1 joined #openstack-rally
22:52 sskripnick joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary