Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-08-15

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:12 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:00 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:45 yanyanhu joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
03:06 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally: [WIP]Fix attachment_id instead of volume_id on detach_volume  https://review.openstack.org/355174
03:22 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
03:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:55 Noam joined #openstack-rally
03:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:16 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:37 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:41 psd joined #openstack-rally
05:17 rook joined #openstack-rally
05:25 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
05:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:53 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:24 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally: Use attachment_id instead of volume_id when detaching volume  https://review.openstack.org/355174
06:24 mewald joined #openstack-rally
06:27 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally: Use attachment_id instead of volume_id when detaching volume  https://review.openstack.org/355174
06:36 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
06:45 Noam left #openstack-rally
06:47 Noam joined #openstack-rally
06:57 zhufl joined #openstack-rally
06:57 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
06:59 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
07:04 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
07:39 chenhb joined #openstack-rally
07:56 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
07:57 zhufl chenhb:hi
08:00 chenhb zhufl:hi
08:14 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:15 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:16 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
08:22 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:35 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
08:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:56 mvk joined #openstack-rally
09:27 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
09:55 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:32 yamamoto_ joined #openstack-rally
10:34 mewald does rally have to have admin access to the openstack cloud? I would prefer to run it with existing users and no admin credentials but it keeps trying to contact my adminURL endpoints
10:40 amaretskiy mewald: hi
10:40 mewald amaretskiy: hi
10:40 amaretskiy mewald: Rally requires admin credentials even if there are existing users are in use
10:41 amaretskiy because rally does some actions like cloud validation
10:41 amaretskiy which can not be performed with user access
10:42 amaretskiy to be sure that cloud is ok, rally create tenant and user (this is a part of validation and performed before scenario is started)
10:43 mewald amaretskiy: so working with pre-created users only would make admin access unnecessary?
10:45 amaretskiy mewald: admin access is always required, even if there are pre-created users
10:45 mewald ok
11:02 andreykurilin mewald: there are two things related to "admin" in Rally. first one is a thing described by amaretskiy - rally needs admin user to do some validation. The second one(you mentioned it) - admin endpoint(adminURL). Keystone V2 requires to do all admin stuff only via admin endpoint, so it is used by default. With latest Rally you can choose which endpoint type to use.
11:33 maeca1 joined #openstack-rally
12:07 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:07 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:13 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Adding 'add-options' arg to `rally verify genconfig` cmd  https://review.openstack.org/352016
12:25 openstackgerrit Anton Studenov proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] hook section  https://review.openstack.org/352276
12:26 sshnaidm|afk joined #openstack-rally
12:28 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][WIP] Add validator plugin base  https://review.openstack.org/346109
12:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:38 mewald Is there a way to tell rally to create users and projects in a separate domain other than default?
12:39 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
12:42 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
12:42 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:02 andreykurilin mewald: sure
13:02 andreykurilin :)
13:03 mewald andreykurilin: how? :D I don't know the documentation seems to be scarce or at least I haven't found it yet :D
13:03 andreykurilin mewald: one moment
13:07 andreykurilin mewald: there are two ways. first one - specify nondefault domains via users context. something like http://xsnippet.org/361902/
13:08 andreykurilin mewald: also, you can specify them via rally config file - https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample#L711-L715
13:12 mewald andreykurilin: interesing, neither method works … I always get projects created in the default domain
13:13 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Fix trends report generation if there are n/a results  https://review.openstack.org/355458
13:14 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
13:20 mewald I am also getting this error about failure to delete default security group. Not sure what's happening there. Any ideas? https://gist.github.com/anonymous/490203875d090b8191669dde364e6cbc
13:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:26 andreykurilin mewald: see L45
13:26 andreykurilin it is impossible to set member role to created user
13:26 andreykurilin it leds keystone failure at the next stages
13:27 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
13:27 yingjun__ joined #openstack-rally
13:27 mewald andreykurilin:  I have rally create the stuff atm.
13:28 mewald We don't user member role but "user"
13:28 mewald can I configure the role name for unprivileged users?
13:29 andreykurilin yes)
13:29 andreykurilin mewald: you should specify keystone_default_role="user"  in users_context section of rally config file
13:29 mewald andreykurilin: how do I find out things like this???
13:32 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:33 andreykurilin mewald: :( we don't have enough time for our docs... everyone wants features... currently there are several ways. first of all we have page with list of plugins http://rally.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugin/plugin_reference.html here you can find expected arguments of scenarios and other plugins. In near future we will add arguments of context too. Also you can search config options in config sample - https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob
13:34 andreykurilin and I want to focuse on docs refactoring in one or two releases.
13:35 mewald last link is a 404 error
13:35 mewald ok so currently I need to dig through the code ...
13:36 andreykurilin mewald: or ping us :)
13:37 andreykurilin mewald: mirror of last link https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/rally/tree/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample
13:47 n254 joined #openstack-rally
13:50 chenhb_ joined #openstack-rally
13:51 chenhb_ left #openstack-rally
13:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:52 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:53 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
13:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:10 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
14:11 chenhb_ joined #openstack-rally
14:12 openstackgerrit Alexander Chadin proposed openstack/rally: Add watcher audit template context and 2 scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/341604
14:22 rkum joined #openstack-rally
14:22 rkum Hi, When I am running rally deployment check, Noticed one of the service is in _unknown_
14:22 rkum | __unknown__ | volumev2            | Available
14:22 rkum How to get valid name in the service list
14:27 mewald rkum: same problem here. any help appreciated
14:31 amaretskiy mewald: rkum: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/cli/commands/deployment.py#L247-L252
14:32 mewald amaretskiy: I've seen this error message but I don't see how it applies in my case. "openstack service list" and "openstack endpoint list" both return proper values
14:36 amaretskiy __unknown__ means that cloud returns services list with their types and some types are unknown for rally. This does not mean that services are actually unknown, but this means that cloud has configuration with renamed types to something different from Rally constants
14:36 amaretskiy to tell Rally what services are there, use api_versions context
14:37 amaretskiy example: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/nova.yaml#L536-L538
14:39 amaretskiy mewald: rkum:   another example: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally-mos.yaml#L19-L21
14:40 amaretskiy mewald: rkum: regarding the output of "rally deployment check" - no way to modify it
14:41 amaretskiy mewald: rkum: only modification of constants can change this output https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/consts.py#L119-L145
14:43 mewald amaretskiy: What's the takeaway from this? Unless I don't want to have my own fork of rally, it's not going to work for volume v2?
14:43 mewald s/don't//
14:43 amaretskiy mewald: use api_versions context :)
14:43 amaretskiy example (with sahara): https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally-mos.yaml#L19-L21
14:44 mewald ahh now I begin to understand :)
14:44 amaretskiy mewald: there is absolutely no problem with running scenarios using any "unknown" services
14:45 mewald is this channel the right place to ask tempest questions, too?
14:45 amaretskiy mewald: i've mentioned consts.py just for explanation
14:46 amaretskiy mewald: if question is related to rally (e.g. launching tempest via rally) then - yes, otherwise - probably not
14:48 mewald amaretskiy: well it kind of is: I managed to configure rally to create users and tenants in a separate domain now. tempest doesn't seem to care. Not sure if this is related but as rally generated the config for tempest, I thought it might be
14:49 amaretskiy ylobankov andreykurilin ^
14:52 andreykurilin mewald rkum: here is a good description of api_version context - http://rally.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugin/plugin_reference.html#api-versions-context
15:07 rkum Thanks Andrey for explanation. I am looking at consts.py. Can we add volume2 in the class_ServiceType in that file?
15:14 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
15:14 zackf joined #openstack-rally
15:22 andreykurilin rkum: yes, we can
15:22 andreykurilin rkum: can you propose a patch for it?
15:25 amaretskiy left #openstack-rally
15:29 rkum Where can I propose for patch for this one. Can you please send me the URL to request
15:32 andreykurilin rkum: http://rally.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contribute.html#how-to-contribute
15:32 rkum Thanks Andrey
15:32 diogogmt joined #openstack-rally
15:42 andreykurilin mewald: can you share failure of rally verify?
16:07 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][WIP] Add validator plugin base  https://review.openstack.org/346109
16:18 mewald joined #openstack-rally
16:28 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
16:29 openstackgerrit Margarita Bliznikova proposed openstack/rally: Delete 'Mode' from glossary  https://review.openstack.org/355560
16:46 openstackgerrit Margarita Bliznikova proposed openstack/rally: Add documentation for different modes of testing in single task Delete 'Mode' from glossary Change-Id: I423e623f6b7a787a9b13a4b75be90190f9f43c4f  https://review.openstack.org/355049
16:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
16:53 hockeynut andreykurilin ping
16:54 hockeynut andreykurilin you mentioned last week that there is a patch that needs some attention - I'd love to help out with RaaS
16:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
17:08 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
17:11 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Adding 'add-options' arg to `rally verify genconfig` cmd  https://review.openstack.org/352016
17:12 andreykurilin__ hockeynut: hi
17:12 andreykurilin__ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253963/
17:12 hockeynut greetings andreykurilin__
17:12 andreykurilin__ This patch was proposed long time ago
17:13 andreykurilin__ But I had no time to finish it
17:13 andreykurilin__ It adds single entry point for initialization of API
17:14 hockeynut andreykurilin__ I'll be more than happy to rebase it and send it back up to get it moving
17:15 andreykurilin__ hockeynut: cool
17:15 andreykurilin__ Thanks
17:16 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Adding 'add-options' arg to `rally verify genconfig` cmd  https://review.openstack.org/352016
17:16 andreykurilin__ And I'll try to speak with amaretskiy this week about next steps
17:18 hockeynut excellent
17:35 psd joined #openstack-rally
17:37 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
17:38 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:54 mewald joined #openstack-rally
18:16 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:10 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
21:19 mvk joined #openstack-rally
22:26 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
22:29 hockeynut joined #openstack-rally
23:36 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
23:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary