Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2016-09-20

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:01 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
00:07 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
00:15 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
00:36 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
00:50 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
00:57 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
01:03 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:14 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:16 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
01:20 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:26 haukebruno joined #openstack-rally
01:33 sshnaidm joined #openstack-rally
01:34 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:46 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
01:48 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
01:55 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:02 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/rally: A typo needs to be fixed  https://review.openstack.org/372831
02:03 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/rally: A typo needs to be fixed  https://review.openstack.org/372831
02:05 obutenko joined #openstack-rally
02:06 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:13 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:20 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:25 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:38 kvcobb joined #openstack-rally
02:41 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:53 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
02:57 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
03:08 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
03:09 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
03:21 _coolsvap_ joined #openstack-rally
03:30 yamamot__ joined #openstack-rally
04:11 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
04:20 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
04:27 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
04:33 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
04:39 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
04:41 shausy joined #openstack-rally
04:47 yamamot__ joined #openstack-rally
04:52 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
04:54 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:02 Alex_Stef joined #openstack-rally
05:05 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
05:09 jroll joined #openstack-rally
05:09 jroll joined #openstack-rally
05:14 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
05:15 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
05:22 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
05:29 aswadr_ joined #openstack-rally
05:49 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
05:49 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
05:55 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
05:55 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:03 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:05 openstackgerrit Ma Xinjian proposed openstack/rally: Add NovaAggregates.create_and_list_aggregates  https://review.openstack.org/369817
06:11 yamamot__ joined #openstack-rally
06:11 openstackgerrit zhufl proposed openstack/rally: Remove unnecessary setUp  https://review.openstack.org/372911
06:12 ipo joined #openstack-rally
06:12 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:15 ipo joined #openstack-rally
06:19 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:32 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:45 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:45 ushkalim joined #openstack-rally
06:50 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
06:50 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
07:00 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
07:06 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
07:12 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
07:16 openstackgerrit iswarya vakati proposed openstack/rally: Don't attempt to escalate rally-manage privileges  https://review.openstack.org/371927
07:19 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
07:25 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
07:31 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
07:55 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
08:03 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
08:10 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
08:10 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
08:29 abehl joined #openstack-rally
08:30 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
08:31 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
08:39 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
08:40 ushkalim_ joined #openstack-rally
08:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove unnecessary setUp  https://review.openstack.org/372911
09:01 lezbar joined #openstack-rally
09:02 mvk joined #openstack-rally
09:04 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:11 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
09:14 strigazi hi rvasilets__, about the class based plugins, should we move all the methods in the class? can we still have the utils file?
09:15 openstackgerrit iswarya vakati proposed openstack/rally: Don't attempt to escalate rally-manage privileges  https://review.openstack.org/371927
09:16 rvasilets__ strigazi, hi, not all, just scenarios. We are keep utils in the same way
09:16 strigazi ok
09:16 rvasilets__ strigazi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358979/6/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/heat/stacks.py
09:17 rvasilets__ strigazi, see here how to move scenario
09:17 strigazi rvasilets__ thanks
09:22 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Fixing issue with downloading images for tests  https://review.openstack.org/372637
09:26 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
09:40 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Port of Auth and Desicnate to new style  https://review.openstack.org/358177
09:41 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of EC2, Fuel and Glance scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/358445
09:42 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
09:44 openstackgerrit Spyros Trigazis proposed openstack/rally: [magnum] Move list baymodels in a scenario class  https://review.openstack.org/373099
09:44 strigazi rvasilets__: ^^
09:47 rvasilets__ strigazi, looks great except the placement of docstring
09:48 rvasilets__ strigazi, Do you know why gerrit show to us old -1's?)
09:48 strigazi node idea, it is very strange
09:49 rvasilets__ strigazi, I mean https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309546/18 that patch
09:50 strigazi yes, I reffrering to that one
09:50 strigazi yes, I was reffrering to that one
09:52 openstackgerrit Spyros Trigazis proposed openstack/rally: [magnum] Move list baymodels in a scenario class  https://review.openstack.org/373099
09:53 strigazi rvasilets__, docstrings fixed ^^ (I guess)
09:53 rvasilets__ strigazi, Now its great. I assume that tests will pass)
09:53 strigazi locally, pep8, py27, py34 and cover passed
09:55 rvasilets__ strigazi, I will ping other cores
09:55 strigazi rvasilets__, great :)
09:59 openstackgerrit Oleg Bondarev proposed openstack/rally: Revert "[rally-jobs] unblock gates"  https://review.openstack.org/371604
10:00 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
10:01 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
10:03 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:04 strigazi rvasilets__: what is the latest stable version of rally?
10:08 strigazi rvasilets__: 0.6.0 is newton?
10:09 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
10:10 rvasilets__ strigazi, http://rally.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release_notes.html yeah its newton
10:10 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of Heat scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/358979
10:10 strigazi rvasilets__, Is it compatible with nova liberty?
10:11 vipul joined #openstack-rally
10:12 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
10:13 rvasilets__ strigazi, its hard question. As far as I know its only in plains to test latest Rally against old OpeStack releases
10:14 strigazi two months ago all the tests we did where done with v0.3.3 and nova *kilo*
10:14 rvasilets__ strigazi, Maybe somene tested it against liberty but I don't know. It might be working because we keep backward compatibility for scenarios
10:14 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally: Moving of Heat scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/358979
10:15 strigazi rvasilets__: What tests do you recommend to do to have an idea?
10:17 albertom joined #openstack-rally
10:18 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Fixing issue with downloading images for the tests  https://review.openstack.org/372637
10:18 rvasilets__ strigazi, For example you may install OpenStack Liberty and test it with 0.6 Rally)
10:19 rvasilets__ I think its not soo hard
10:19 rvasilets__ As for me this is the simplest way
10:30 igajsin left #openstack-rally
10:35 mvk joined #openstack-rally
10:48 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
10:50 haukebruno joined #openstack-rally
10:52 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
10:55 psd joined #openstack-rally
11:01 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
11:18 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
11:19 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
11:21 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: Add sys_call hook  https://review.openstack.org/367365
11:25 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
11:37 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: Fixing docker-check jenkins job  https://review.openstack.org/373200
11:38 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
11:44 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: Fixing docker-check jenkins job  https://review.openstack.org/373200
11:55 coolsvap_ joined #openstack-rally
11:56 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
12:04 mvk joined #openstack-rally
12:05 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:07 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
12:23 strigazi andreykurilin, rvasilets__ do you think we can merge mangum baymodel now?
12:23 andreykurilin strigazi: why not?)
12:23 strigazi great
12:26 strigazi I think 309546 needs 373099, they should merge together
12:27 andreykurilin I forgot to pu +w
12:27 andreykurilin *put
12:28 andreykurilin strigazi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321903/8/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/magnum/utils.py . Is there any docs about how to use k8s python client?
12:32 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
12:36 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: Fixing docker-check jenkins job  https://review.openstack.org/373200
12:40 strigazi andreykurilin: https://github.com/openstack/python-k8sclient/tree/master/doc/source
12:44 strigazi andreykurilin, from my perscpective the approach of 321903 is wrong
12:45 andreykurilin strigazi: yes, I saw this "docs". Usage page is cool :) https://github.com/openstack/python-k8sclient/blob/master/doc/source/usage.rst
12:46 mvk joined #openstack-rally
12:46 strigazi I don't  believe we need context for certificates. And if we do, I'd like to see a general change that will allow us to create scenarios like "create container, etc"
12:48 strigazi magnum manages the infrastructure and provides the certs to contact k8s or docker directly. Magnum users can do use one command "magnum bay-config <bayname>" and then they can use docker or kubectl
12:48 strigazi andreykurilin rvasilets__ what do you think? ^^
12:50 andreykurilin strigazi: sorry, I don't get you:( Do you dislike https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321903/8/rally/plugins/openstack/context/magnum/ca_certs.py or just k8s scenarios?
12:54 strigazi both, I think we must have a general scenario and then users can adapt on what they want to do.
12:54 strigazi The scenario could take a scipt as parameter
12:54 strigazi The scenario could take a script as parameter
12:55 strigazi we don't benchmark kubernetes with rally we benchmark magnum.
12:55 andreykurilin strigazi: "we don't benchmark kubernetes" yet:) I want to start work on this task in next days:)
12:55 andreykurilin but yes, I got your point
12:56 strigazi A generic scenario could do the work
12:57 strigazi then you pass a sciprt and then you can benchmark k8s too
12:58 strigazi We also want to find a way to test that the cluster works properly with kubectl not python-k8sclient
12:59 strigazi it should be the same, but you never now until you test it :)
12:59 andreykurilin strigazi: why you don't want to use python-k8sclient. Is it so bad? subprocess + kubectl should be better?
13:02 strigazi No, it's not bad. The idea is: We use rally to be sure that our infra works all the time, so we create vms and volumes every hour. (soon magnum bays). Our users use kubectl not the python client, so we want to test with that is epxected to be used by our users. of course test with python-k8sclient are useful as well
13:04 strigazi andreykurilin, bottomline I want both :)
13:05 andreykurilin but both python-k8sclient and kubectl use one K8s api, so there should not be difference between what to use while testing.
13:07 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
13:08 mdufresne joined #openstack-rally
13:09 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
13:12 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:12 strigazi true, it should be the same.
13:14 andreykurilin strigazi: PS: I'm not against to have both solutions:)
13:15 strigazi andreykurilin: cool B-)
13:17 ccard joined #openstack-rally
13:18 nwadhwa joined #openstack-rally
13:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Moving of Heat scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/358979
13:23 vaidy joined #openstack-rally
13:29 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
13:36 openstackstatus joined #openstack-rally
13:38 strigazi andreykurilin, rvasilets__, why does the neutron job fail? gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally FAILURE in 59m 23s is there an issue?
13:40 rvasilets__ strigazi, Its an issue of Neutron, they have a lot of failures for the last two weeks). They are investigating them.
13:41 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
13:42 strigazi rvasilets__, so recheck?
13:42 dratushnyy Hi guys, I got following error while running "rally deployment check"
13:42 dratushnyy BadRequest: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400)
13:42 dratushnyy here is headers from post request
13:43 dratushnyy {'headers': {'Accept': 'application/json'}, 'json': {'auth': {'scope': {'project': {'name': 'admin'}}, 'identity': {'password': {'user': {'password': '….', 'name': 'admin'}}, 'methods': ['password']}}}, 'authenticated': False, 'log': False}
13:43 andreykurilin rvasilets__, strigazi: we merged a fix to neutron job this night and it should work now.
13:43 andreykurilin dratushnyy: as far as I understand, it is keystone v3 deployment. Am I right?
13:43 dratushnyy yes
13:43 rvasilets__ strigazi, yes
13:44 openstackstatus NOTICE: OpenStack Infra now has a Twitter bot, follow it at https://twitter.com/openstackinfra
13:47 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:50 dratushnyy andreykurilin, this is keystone v3 deployment created with "rally deployment create —fromenv"
13:50 dratushnyy so, is it know bug or something wrong with my openrc?
13:52 drowt joined #openstack-rally
13:53 andreykurilin dratushnyy: it is not a well-known issue and I have no ideas what had happen
13:54 dratushnyy I suppose that there should be "domain" in post request headers, and for some reason its not there, also, in the ~/.rally/openrc
13:54 dratushnyy export OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME='None'
13:54 dratushnyy export OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME='None'
13:54 dratushnyy and there is no OS_USER_DOMAIN_ID
13:55 dratushnyy is there bug for this in launchpad or I need to create new?
13:56 openstackgerrit Yaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: Fixing docker-check jenkins job  https://review.openstack.org/373200
13:58 dratushnyy and is there workaround?
14:22 andreykurilin dratushnyy: you can try to create deployment from json config file and specify doman-Nmae there
14:24 dratushnyy let me try to do that
14:30 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
14:32 antwash any idea why so many gate test failed ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366869/
14:33 tosky joined #openstack-rally
14:45 castulo joined #openstack-rally
14:51 stpierre antwash: you moved basically all of the keystone scenarios out of KeystoneBasic and into AuthenticateUserAndValidateToken
14:53 antwash @stpierre I see assuming this patch will fix that since all scenarios are being changed to class based https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359088/6
14:53 stpierre well that patch conflicts with yours
14:54 stpierre but it is somewhat related, i suppose
14:57 antwash Yeah they're related to each other converting scenarios to classed based -- thanks for the help :-)
14:57 dratushnyy after creating deployment from json and adding domain_name, I got this
14:57 dratushnyy AuthorizationFailure: Authentication cannot be scoped to multiple targets. Pick one of: project, domain, trust or unscoped
15:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Moving of Ceilometer scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/356285
15:35 orionx joined #openstack-rally
15:41 andreykurilin dratushnyy: please share your deployment config
15:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Moving of Volumes scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/357255
15:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Moving of Ceilometer Alarms scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/354605
15:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Moving set of scenarios into separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/359236
15:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Adding the task attribute to the Hook instance  https://review.openstack.org/372481
15:47 dratushnyy http://pastebin.com/RDCzuz8s
15:59 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
16:04 kjorgensen joined #openstack-rally
16:11 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
16:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Magnum] Context and scenario for Magnum baymodel  https://review.openstack.org/309546
16:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [magnum] Move list baymodels in a scenario class  https://review.openstack.org/373099
16:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fixing docker-check jenkins job  https://review.openstack.org/373200
16:49 pvaneck joined #openstack-rally
16:55 mvk joined #openstack-rally
17:03 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
17:06 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
17:17 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
17:20 igajsin joined #openstack-rally
17:20 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
17:26 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
17:38 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
17:39 orionx_ joined #openstack-rally
17:43 orionx joined #openstack-rally
17:44 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
17:46 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
17:49 igajsin left #openstack-rally
17:50 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
17:56 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
18:07 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
18:12 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
18:30 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:32 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
18:51 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
19:05 openstackgerrit Tyler North proposed openstack/rally: add image name support to VolumeGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/373503
19:14 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
19:18 openstackgerrit Tyler North proposed openstack/rally: add image name support to VolumeGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/373503
19:29 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
19:32 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
19:37 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
19:45 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
19:57 mdufresne joined #openstack-rally
19:59 psd joined #openstack-rally
20:00 mdufresne hey guys! I have a sample question, if I run a NovaServers.boot_and_delete_server task with the constant runner, 10 times, concurrency of 2 with the users context, 2 users per tenant, 2 tenants, how many servers will be created on each iteration?
20:02 openstackgerrit Tyler North proposed openstack/rally: allow passing of specific volume type  https://review.openstack.org/353025
20:03 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
20:07 stpierre mdufresne: one
20:09 mdufresne so it will create 1 server in a randomly selected user, 2 at a time, 5 times?
20:09 mdufresne I’m just trying to figure out the best way to test different load levels
20:16 stpierre sort of, yeah
20:17 stpierre it will create 1 server in a randomly selected user, ten times, in two threads
20:17 stpierre i can't recall if they're evenly balanced among the threads or not, but they're not guaranteed to be simultaneous
20:17 mdufresne ok
20:18 mdufresne so in the end the “times” value is the number of created resources?
20:18 mdufresne and concurency is the number of threads
20:18 stpierre times is the number of times the scenario is run
20:18 stpierre some scenarios can create lots of resources
20:18 stpierre but this scenario creates one server per invocation
20:19 mdufresne ok great
20:19 mdufresne well thanks for your help!
20:19 stpierre np
20:44 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
21:07 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
21:08 beslemon_ joined #openstack-rally
21:10 beslemon_ joined #openstack-rally
21:24 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
21:27 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
21:45 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
21:46 openstackgerrit Tyler North proposed openstack/rally: add image name support to VolumeGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/373503
22:03 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT TOUCH, DO NOT LOOK: refactor verification  https://review.openstack.org/372334
22:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add sys_call hook  https://review.openstack.org/367365
22:21 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
22:50 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
23:18 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
23:24 itsuugo joined #openstack-rally
23:40 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
23:41 adiantum1 joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary