Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2017-04-21

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:01 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally master: Fix atomic wrapper  https://review.openstack.org/457429
01:02 aojea joined #openstack-rally
01:16 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
01:35 yanyanhu joined #openstack-rally
01:35 chenhb joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gitter https://gitter.im/rally-dev/Lobby ☁ Review board: https://goo.gl/iYw2m0 ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  andreykurilin, boris-42, amaretskiy, rvasilets, stpierre  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:
01:59 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally master: Fix atomic wrapper  https://review.openstack.org/457429
02:03 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:12 openstackgerrit Ma Xinjian proposed openstack/rally master: Add NovaServers.boot_server_and_list_interfaces  https://review.openstack.org/420635
02:16 openstackgerrit chenaidong1 proposed openstack/rally master: Modify log marker functions's usage in an exception  https://review.openstack.org/458712
02:55 baker joined #openstack-rally
03:38 openstackgerrit Ma Xinjian proposed openstack/rally master: Add NovaServers.boot_server_and_list_interfaces  https://review.openstack.org/420635
04:33 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
05:00 chhavi joined #openstack-rally
05:20 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP][atomic_actions]Port report to new atomic actions  https://review.openstack.org/454512
05:25 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:09 openstackgerrit Andrey Pavlov proposed openstack/rally master: fix auth in EC2Client and tests for it  https://review.openstack.org/458517
06:15 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
06:18 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
06:47 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:11 tesseract joined #openstack-rally
07:17 aojea joined #openstack-rally
07:18 aojea_ joined #openstack-rally
07:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:49 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'image-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/457203
07:49 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
07:55 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : @andreykurilin
07:55 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : I have replied to your comment in   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421047/  , If you are free, pls give a reply。
07:55 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'network-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458508
07:55 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'network-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458508
08:14 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin I think I found the root cause of the bgpvpn issue : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386418/11
08:27 rcernin joined #openstack-rally
08:28 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohon nice. how can we fix it?)
08:28 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @MaXinjian give me a minute
08:35 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin I'm still investigating. We don't set it as a conf file for neutron in our gate, but the job pass
08:36 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin I'll look at how other neutron services works to mimic them, but I think the solution will be in a patch in our devstack plugin
08:36 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohon maybe we should include something from https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/tree/master/devstack to rally gate
08:36 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : ?
08:37 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin by enbling the plugin, those hooks are already taken into account, i think
08:39 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : the local.conf used in your job looks good to me, I don't understand the deep reason of the failure
08:39 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : I'm on the way to reproduce the env locally
08:39 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : ok, thanks
08:41 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : As I said, you're not the only integration project that has the issue, I'd like to fix it one for all
08:43 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'external-network-exists' validator to 'op...ck/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458525
08:46 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @MaXinjian replied
08:46 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : @andreykurilin  thx
09:07 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:07 Serlex joined #openstack-rally
09:09 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
09:11 openstackgerrit zhangzhihui proposed openstack/rally master: Add cinder.CreateAndSetQos scenario  https://review.openstack.org/458779
09:12 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:20 openstackgerrit zhangzhihui proposed openstack/rally master: Add cinder.CreateAndListVolumeTypes scenario  https://review.openstack.org/432135
09:32 anshul joined #openstack-rally
09:35 anshul joined #openstack-rally
09:35 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : @andreykurilin  @validation.add("required_params", params=[("create_spec", "provider")]), why create_spec is been putted into params,   Shouldn't it  be like this?
09:35 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : @validation.add("required_params", params=("provider", "..."),subdict="create_specs")
09:39 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
09:41 openstackgerrit chenhb proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP][atomic_actions]Port report to new atomic actions  https://review.openstack.org/454512
09:50 dixiaoli joined #openstack-rally
09:50 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
10:01 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458796/
10:01 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : it fixes the issue in my env
10:02 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : can I make https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386418/ depending on 458796 with a Depends-on flag in the commit message?
10:07 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:07 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
10:12 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
10:29 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohom sure
10:32 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @MaXinjian the first(proposed in the comment) idea allows to support two cases: backward compatible via "args": {"create_spec": {"provider": "foo"}} and specifying explicitly(the right way) via "args": {"provider": "foo"}
10:35 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : En, then what should I passed as subdict  in this case ?
10:35 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : I found I have totally misunderstood your meaning.
11:03 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : ok, let's start from the beggining)
11:04 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : so we have several scenarios which were released and which accept one argument specs
11:06 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : `specs` is a dict with undocumented properties. It is not good, convinient and user-friendly
11:07 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : that is why you replaced `specs` argument by all it's properties in previous patch-set. in other words you removed one redundant level of arguments
11:08 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : BUT, since scenarios were released, we cannot change it's interface without backward compatibility.
11:09 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : so we need to support specifying arguments via `specs` dict (do not waste time with extra validation. it should be deprecated) or  via specifing all arguments at top level(as it was done in previous patch-set)
11:11 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : To do it, scenarios should accept all "specs", "provider", "cipher", "key_size", "control_location" arguments at the one level. In case if "provider" argument is specified, "specs" argument should be ignored and a spec should be constructed from "provider", "cipher", "key_size", "control_location" (like it was in your previous patch-set)
11:11 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : if "provider" is not specified and "specs" presents, "specs" should be used
11:12 stpierre_ joined #openstack-rally
11:12 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : Since for different cases "specs" or "provider" should not be "required", they should have default value None, so args-specs validator will not fail
11:14 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : But such case produces a situation when neither "specs" not "provider" is specified. For that case we should use required_params validator, which should check that "specs" or "provider" (top argument of scenario, not a property of "specs") is specified
11:14 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : To make required_params support it, I proposed a small change in the comment to patch
11:14 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @MaXinjian ^
11:15 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : hope, my thoughts about how your change should look become more clear now:)
11:21 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: Adds Networking-bgpvpn tests  https://review.openstack.org/386418
11:23 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'required_services' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458809
11:26 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'external-network-exists' validator to 'op...ck/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458525
11:33 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
11:33 openstackgerrit Anton Studenov proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP][WIP] Remove existing_users context  https://review.openstack.org/458810
11:36 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
11:39 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: [wip] Add lazy-migration for atomics  https://review.openstack.org/458561
11:39 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
11:56 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
12:23 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'image-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/457203
12:26 yanyanhu joined #openstack-rally
12:28 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'image-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/457203
12:42 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : @andreykurilin re
12:42 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : http://logs.openstack.org/18/386418/12/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-extensions-rally-nv/c1107e6/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-04-21_11_25_49_302
12:42 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : it looks like the depends-on had no effect
12:43 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : the job is still cloning bgpvpn:master
12:43 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : :(
12:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally master: Add support for namespaces into context manager  https://review.openstack.org/458116
12:43 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : it use to work in the past?
12:44 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : I think yes
12:44 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : at least for other projects
12:45 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohon does path to your config file constant?
12:47 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
12:50 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : well in the gate context I think, but it rely on NEUTRON_CONF_DIR that can be overidden in devstack
12:51 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : so theoretically, we can extend https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386418/ with change of rally devstack plugin to put your config path to neutron configs. Am I right?
12:51 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : *with temporary change that will help to understand that your fix works
12:52 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : yep, it should work
12:52 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohon Can you propose a change?
12:54 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : I'm not familiar with rally devstack plugin, I'll ask cedric to have look
12:54 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] matrohon : the bgpvpn gate is currently broken, I have to handle that first
12:54 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : ok
12:55 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : good luck with your gates ;)
12:56 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: 'network-exists' validator removed  https://review.openstack.org/458508
12:57 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
12:57 Serlex joined #openstack-rally
12:58 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:10 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
13:16 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:16 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:22 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'image-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/457203
13:24 tikitavi joined #openstack-rally
13:25 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'image-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/457203
13:26 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
13:28 dave-mccowan joined #openstack-rally
13:34 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: Move 'external-network-exists' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458525
13:35 baker joined #openstack-rally
13:36 chenhb joined #openstack-rally
13:42 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
13:57 chhavi__ joined #openstack-rally
13:59 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
13:59 chhavi joined #openstack-rally
14:04 openstackgerrit Cedric Savignan proposed openstack/rally master: Add networking-bgpvpn in rally devstack plugin  https://review.openstack.org/458852
14:10 baker joined #openstack-rally
14:10 catintheroof joined #openstack-rally
14:11 openstackgerrit Cedric Savignan proposed openstack/rally master: Adds Networking-bgpvpn tests  https://review.openstack.org/386418
14:15 dixiaoli joined #openstack-rally
14:25 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : @andreykurilin   thank you for your patient explanation,  I will work on it tomorrow. If I am still stupid, I will ask you again. O(∩_∩)O。
14:25 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] MaXinjian : Have a nice weekend!
14:27 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
14:31 openstackgerrit Andrey Pavlov proposed openstack/rally master: DNM: fix auth in EC2Client and tests for it  https://review.openstack.org/458517
14:34 tikitavi joined #openstack-rally
14:47 Serlex joined #openstack-rally
14:50 tikitavi andreykurillin: Hi, I've registered a bug for our ec2api_plugin in rally. https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1685246 Hoping to get help :)
14:50 openstack Launchpad bug 1685246 in Rally "external plugin stopped being invoked" [Undecided,New]
14:53 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @MaXinjian you questions are not stupid. please, do not hesitate to ask anything:)
14:53 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : tikitavi: hi! how is an owner of boto client?
14:58 tikitavi I don't know... We don't use boto for our plugin.
14:59 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : tikitavi: what is ec2-api client library?
15:01 tikitavi andreykurilin: botocore.
15:02 tikitavi andreykurilin: The code that crashes is not ours, we know nothing about it.
15:02 tikitavi andreykurilin: And it isn't related to our plugin.
15:03 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : tikitavi: ok.. actually, I do not know the history of it too:) and we do not have any scenarios for that class too.
15:04 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : if the current patch-set  is not help, let's remove usage of it from osresources, put deprecation warning into the class and forgot about it
15:09 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
15:10 openstackgerrit Andrey Pavlov proposed openstack/rally master: DNM: fix auth in EC2Client and tests for it  https://review.openstack.org/458517
15:11 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
15:11 tikitavi Yes, we are waiting. And - once again for better understanding - it isn't our code, we don't use it, and don't know what do with it :) We've tried some workarounds to start rally jobs, if they won't succeed, I think we need help to get our plugin invoked.
15:18 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
15:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally master: 'network-exists' validator removed  https://review.openstack.org/458508
15:37 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
15:38 tikitavi andreykurilin: Ok, the last patch didn't help. We are finished :)
15:39 tikitavi You can do everything you want now ))
15:40 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'required_services' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458809
15:43 openstackgerrit Staroverov Anton proposed openstack/rally master: [WIP] Move 'required_services' validator to 'openstack/validators.py'  https://review.openstack.org/458809
15:43 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
15:49 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: Deprecate rally.osclients.EC2  https://review.openstack.org/458517
15:50 MasterOfBugs joined #openstack-rally
15:51 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
15:53 openstackgerrit Cedric Savignan proposed openstack/rally master: Add networking-bgpvpn in rally devstack plugin  https://review.openstack.org/458852
16:02 beslemon joined #openstack-rally
16:28 jkilpatr_ joined #openstack-rally
16:33 beslemon_ joined #openstack-rally
16:39 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] andreykurilin : @matrohon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458852/ verified that change to your devstack plugin should fix an issue with neutron-extensions job
16:58 chhavi joined #openstack-rally
17:01 akrzos joined #openstack-rally
17:06 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
17:26 ig0r_ joined #openstack-rally
17:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally master: Fix atomic wrapper  https://review.openstack.org/457429
17:46 anshul joined #openstack-rally
18:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally master: Deprecate rally.osclients.EC2  https://review.openstack.org/458517
19:06 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:43 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit will be offline briefly starting at 20:00 for scheduled maintenance http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115702.html
20:04 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is offline briefly for scheduled maintenance http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115702.html
20:04 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit is offline briefly for scheduled maintenance http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115702.html
20:25 alexchadin joined #openstack-rally
20:26 anshul joined #openstack-rally
20:27 aojea joined #openstack-rally
20:35 aojea_ joined #openstack-rally
20:36 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gitter https://gitter.im/rally-dev/Lobby ☁ Review board: https://goo.gl/iYw2m0 ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  andreykurilin, boris-42, amaretskiy, rvasilets, stpierre  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:
20:36 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is back in service and generally usable, though remote Git replicas (git.openstack.org and github.com) will be stale for the next few hours until online reindexing completes
20:40 aojea joined #openstack-rally
20:54 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally
21:02 aojea_ joined #openstack-rally
21:08 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
21:08 openstackgerrit Pramod Raghavendra Jayathirth proposed openstack/rally master: DO NOT MERGE  https://review.openstack.org/458972
21:18 aojea joined #openstack-rally
21:19 aojea_ joined #openstack-rally
21:22 aojea__ joined #openstack-rally
23:07 rallydev-bot [From Gitter] chenhb-zte : @andreykurilin, if that, it effects rally installing with devstack?
23:10 abalutoiu_ joined #openstack-rally
23:13 abalutoiu__ joined #openstack-rally
23:17 abalutoiu joined #openstack-rally
23:30 dixiaoli joined #openstack-rally
23:39 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
23:56 yamamoto joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary