Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #parrot, 2012-01-17

Parrot | source cross referenced

| Channels | #parrot index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:06 whiteknight joined #parrot
00:15 kid51 joined #parrot
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: bcf2a4e | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm:
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: Fix a couple of $/ handling issues. Of note, $/ was not available to code blocks inside of regexes, and the code that shoulda been setting it was binding, whereas we assign to $/.
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/bcf2a4ea27
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: dba6048 | jnthn++ | src/core/ (2 files):
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: Fix using make inside a regex (it only worked when used in the action method before now).
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/dba604867f
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: d3471b9 | jnthn++ | t/spectest.data:
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: Run S05-match/make.t.
00:24 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/d3471b9e67
00:45 offby1 joined #parrot
00:52 whiteknight good evening, #parrot
00:53 cotto hio whiteknight
00:53 whiteknight ...are you kidding me? NQP uses :instanceof?
00:53 whiteknight I didn't think that code was usable, much less used
00:53 cotto glad you saw that
00:53 * whiteknight says a curse word
00:54 whiteknight did somebody revert it?
00:54 cotto me too, now that I look at it
00:55 cotto I don't think anyone has
00:55 whiteknight okay
00:55 whiteknight shit. NQP uses it all over the place
00:55 cotto yup
00:56 whiteknight I've reverted it, I'm testing now
00:57 whiteknight I'll test build NQP too
01:06 cotto I can imagine instanceof working reasonably well the way nqp uses it.
01:13 kid51 Darwin/PPC: make test PASS at c383a63
01:14 kid51 Linux/i386: make test PASS at HEAD: 4 ways: gcc g++ w/wo optimize
01:44 * whiteknight hates
01:44 dalek parrot: bb02f3f | Whiteknight++ | compilers/imcc/ (7 files):
01:44 dalek parrot: Revert "Remove the :instanceof flag from PIR."
01:44 dalek parrot:
01:44 dalek parrot: This reverts commit 395ff548295f019d9a67ab122f1be32cf1a32731.
01:44 dalek parrot: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/bb02f3f60b
01:52 dalek parrot: eb2b219 | jkeenan++ | MANIFEST.SKIP:
01:52 dalek parrot: Rerun mk_manifest_and_skip.pl so that make manifest_tests passes.
01:52 dalek parrot: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/eb2b219fd5
01:52 dalek parrot: 03d92a8 | jkeenan++ | compilers/imcc/ (7 files):
01:52 dalek parrot: Merge branch 'master' of git@github.com:parrot/parrot
01:52 dalek parrot: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/03d92a85d7
03:30 jsut_ joined #parrot
03:36 jsut joined #parrot
03:38 Psyche^ joined #parrot
05:59 GeJ_ joined #parrot
07:23 dalek rakudo/nom: 02d6448 | moritz++ | src/core/Duration.pm:
07:23 dalek rakudo/nom: more conversion methods in Duration
07:23 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/02d644823e
08:50 muixirt joined #parrot
08:50 muixirt good morning
08:51 mj41 joined #parrot
08:52 muixirt seen fperrad
08:52 aloha fperrad was last seen in #parrot 14 hours 34 mins ago joining the channel.
09:25 muixirt msg fperrad many parrot-lua tests don't run anymore, they choke on require 'Test.More'
09:25 aloha OK. I'll deliver the message.
09:26 moritz hi
09:27 moritz can anybody please summarize the state of lorito for me?
09:28 muixirt moritz: would that help rakudo?
09:28 moritz muixirt: no, just satisfy my curiosity
09:30 muixirt moritz: the problem is the overall architecture, not the core byte interpreter
09:31 muixirt coding a bytecode interpreter is quite simple, isn't it?
09:31 muixirt *core bytecode interpreter*
09:31 moritz I was hoping for was answering questions like "what has been done, what remains to do, who does it?"
09:35 muixirt moritz: that's easy ;-) https://github.com/parrot/parrot/tree/m0-prototype
09:36 moritz muixirt: I see a source tree and a README that doesn't even mention m0. Not a summary.
09:38 lucian joined #parrot
09:40 muixirt moritz: are nqp-ops form a high-level interface to a vm? and how would m0/lorito fit into that?
09:41 moritz muixirt: there are two things, dynops in the nqp repo, and the nqp:: operator syntax in nqp and rakudo
09:41 moritz muixirt: which one are you talking about?
09:42 muixirt nqp::
09:42 moritz muixirt: ok. Yes, they form a kind of (shallow) abstraction of a VM. Currently they are just compiled to calls of ops or dynops
09:43 moritz for example nqp::substr compiles to the 'substr' PIR op
09:43 moritz and nqp::x to the 'repeat__PI' opcode
11:10 dalek rakudo/nom: 8975299 | moritz++ | t/spectest.data:
11:10 dalek rakudo/nom: track test file renaming
11:10 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/8975299436
11:33 muixirt moritz: what else has a vm (implementing all 125 nqp::ops) to supply to run rakudo?
11:34 moritz muixirt: well, first it needs some prerequisits like having closures
11:34 moritz muixirt: then somebody needs to implement the codegen for that VM
11:34 moritz muixirt: and then there's lots of parrot-specific code regarding exception handlers, module loading etc.
11:39 muixirt so rakudo relies on a lot of pir/parrot stuff that is not expressed by nqp::ops?
11:41 muixirt in the near term will there be a complete set of nqp::ops that provide all that and make it a real bytecode/intermediate language?
11:42 muixirt the boundaries seem to be fuzzy
11:46 muixirt moritz: the possibility switching to another platform/vm like clr/jvm (or a completely remodeled parrot) is far away
12:12 bluescreen joined #parrot
12:48 bluescreen joined #parrot
13:08 dalek rakudo/nom: 0ac25d0 | jnthn++ | src/core/ (2 files):
13:08 dalek rakudo/nom: First cut implementation of <prior>; seems to work, but sadly not for the m/.../ form.
13:08 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/0ac25d036d
14:52 benabik joined #parrot
14:52 PacoAir joined #parrot
14:53 benabik ~~
14:55 benabik (backlogging)  Blah, I should have just reverted that instanceof thing myself instead of carping.  benabik--
15:00 PerlJam Who is handling the release today?
15:03 PerlJam And is trac being abandoned completely?
15:04 benabik PerlJam: I think we're trying to leave trac, yes.
15:05 moritz - Jan 17, 2012 - 4.0.0   - whiteknight
15:06 moritz from project/release_manager_guide.pod
15:08 benabik Hm.  We should probably s/trac/github/ in our docs before the release.
15:08 PerlJam I was just noticing that 16 files in the docs direcotry mention trac.parrot.org
15:08 PerlJam several of them talk about the roadmap and issues and such.
15:09 benabik I don't think we've been using the roadmap stuff for a while already.  :-/
15:10 moritz $ moritz@jacq:~/p6/rakudo/parrot>ack -aQ 'trac.parrot.org'|wc -l
15:10 moritz 169
15:11 benabik There's going to be a lot of references to trac in api.yaml
15:11 benabik ...  And we should add links to github issues from the trac tickets.  :-/
15:12 benabik I wonder if we have a list of TT# to gh#
15:12 PerlJam Whatever did the bulk move should
15:13 benabik It was run by someone at github, I think.
15:15 PerlJam oh, each github issue has a link to the original trac ticket.
15:15 PerlJam (I think)
15:15 benabik So the data isn't lost, at least.
15:16 moritz hrmpf
15:16 moritz docs/submissions.pod seems quite out of date
15:16 benabik docs/** needs love
15:19 dalek parrot/github-links: dc3d65b | moritz++ | / (4 files):
15:19 dalek parrot/github-links: replace some references to trac.parrot.org with the appropriate links to github issues
15:19 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/dc3d65bd0b
15:19 moritz four mentions down, 165 to go :-)
15:19 benabik hah.
15:20 aloha (parrot/parrot) Issues opened : 694 (Docs still refer to trac.parrot.org) by Benabik : https://github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/694
15:23 PerlJam benabik: the docs in the github wiki also point to trac.parrot.org  :(
15:24 benabik Well, the transition was done only a few days ago, so it's not surprising.
15:25 PerlJam rather than muck with the docs right away (i.e., before the release), perhaps it would be easier (for now) to make trac.parrot.org redirect to github for a little while.
15:26 PerlJam If someone really needs to access trac, it could be another URL
15:26 PerlJam s/be another/be via another/
15:26 moritz PerlJam: because of the immanent release I've started doing it in a branch
15:27 dalek parrot/github-links: 4b038fb | moritz++ | docs/ (2 files):
15:27 dalek parrot/github-links: more doc updates
15:27 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/4b038fb62a
15:28 * PerlJam makes his comment on issue 694
15:28 benabik When is the release supposed to be?  Today?
15:29 PerlJam - Jan 17, 2012 - 4.0.0   - whiteknight
15:29 * benabik doesn't pay much attention to releases, obviously.
15:29 benabik Hm.
15:35 PerlJam er, someone give me commit on the parrot repo and I'll help update the links with moritz
15:35 moritz PerlJam: you don't have one?
15:35 PerlJam apparently not.
15:36 PerlJam (I haven't rally touched parrot in a long time.)
15:36 PerlJam s/rally/really/ even
15:38 PerlJam apparently the last time I committed anything to the parrot repo, it was still in svn
15:38 NotFound PerlJam: What's yout github account? PerlJam?
15:38 PerlJam NotFound: perlpiolot
15:38 PerlJam er, perlpilot
15:40 PerlJam Is there a roadmap-a-like in github?
15:41 NotFound This https://github.com/perlpilot ?
15:41 PerlJam NotFound: aye
15:42 NotFound Added to Developers team. If I remember well, that gives you the write permission on the repos.
15:42 dalek parrot/github-links: 00e4c7d | duff++ | docs/translations/README. (6 files):
15:42 dalek parrot/github-links: Mention github issues in translations
15:42 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/00e4c7db0b
15:42 PerlJam ding!  :)
15:42 NotFound Yes, Push & Pull grant.
15:42 moritz just to be clear... are we abandoning all of trac? or just the tickets?
15:43 benabik I think we're trying to leave trac.
15:43 benabik It's been problematic to keep running and keep clear of spam.
15:47 dalek parrot/github-links: 66823eb | moritz++ | examples/ (2 files):
15:47 dalek parrot/github-links: fix links to abc and befunge
15:47 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/66823eb259
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: 386b6b0 | benabik++ | docs/book/draft/appe_source_code.pod:
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: Mention github in "Use the Source"
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/386b6b02bd
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: aa2df56 | benabik++ | docs/book/draft/ch01_introduction.pod:
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: book: Mention github in Chapter 1
15:53 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/aa2df566ef
15:56 moritz down to 147 mentions
15:57 alvis moritz++
15:58 PerlJam Some of these will require an extensive overhaul of the text
15:59 PerlJam docs/submissions.pod for instnace
15:59 moritz aye
15:59 alvis in submissions.pod: does anyone know, is there an github email address to use? something to tickets@parrot.org? ...
15:59 * moritz works on ticket_triaging.pod
15:59 alvis or is it just parrot-dev?
15:59 PerlJam moritz: that one is highly trac-oriented too
15:59 moritz alvis: I don't there is an email-to-github-issues gateway
16:00 alvis moritz: so ... parrot-dev for now, do you think? (and we come up with something later?)
16:00 moritz alvis: parrot-dev for discussion, gh issues for submission
16:00 dalek parrot/github-links: 00d9dc0 | benabik++ | docs/book/p (2 files):
16:00 dalek parrot/github-links: book: Remove last trac mentions
16:00 dalek parrot/github-links:
16:00 dalek parrot/github-links: A lot of this is very redundant, I'm noticing...
16:00 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/00d9dc09a8
16:02 dalek parrot/github-links: 80199fd | moritz++ | docs/project/ticket_triaging.pod:
16:02 dalek parrot/github-links: fix URLs in ticket_triaging.pod; the rest still needs updating I fear
16:02 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/80199fd46d
16:03 alvis moritz: ok then. i'll pull it out.
16:04 dalek parrot/github-links: 1408b09 | duff++ | docs/project/cage_cleaners_guide.pod:
16:04 dalek parrot/github-links: new github cage url
16:04 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/1408b09a58
16:05 dmalcolm joined #parrot
16:11 dalek parrot/github-links: b60e8a0 | benabik++ | docs/ (3 files):
16:11 dalek parrot/github-links: docs: misc link updates to github
16:11 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/b60e8a03c0
16:12 dalek parrot/github-links: 9c18519 | duff++ | / (2 files):
16:12 dalek parrot/github-links: update Languages url
16:12 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/9c185197fb
16:14 dalek parrot/github-links: f3d6241 | benabik++ | src/ops/experimental.ops:
16:14 dalek parrot/github-links: src/ops/experimental: Use github issues, not trac
16:14 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/f3d624112e
16:17 dalek parrot/github-links: 1400ed7 | benabik++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in:
16:17 dalek parrot/github-links: Makefile: Ask people to submit patches to github
16:17 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/1400ed7679
16:18 dalek parrot/github-links: e97ba05 | benabik++ | examples/languages/squaak/d​oc/tutorial_episode_1.pod:
16:18 dalek parrot/github-links: Squaak: Point to github languages list
16:18 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/e97ba05e7f
16:20 PerlJam What maintains api.yaml?  Is it generated or hand tooled or what?
16:21 benabik I believe it's by hand for theoretical automated consumption.
16:23 dalek parrot/github-links: 748f522 | benabik++ | t/tools/install/testlib/README:
16:23 dalek parrot/github-links: Update a README to github from trac
16:23 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/748f52231b
16:27 benabik I think I got a lot of the LHF...  I don't have the tuits to search for updated ticket numbers.   And I don't know if it's worth converting other wiki pages right now.
16:33 benabik alvis: Are you making parrotbug submit directly to github?
16:34 benabik I am very much in favor of this apparent development.  :-)  alvis++
16:35 alvis benabik: yep
16:35 benabik \o/
16:35 benabik I was just looking at parrotbug going "does this do anything useful"
16:36 aloha (parrot/parrot) Issues opened : 695 (This is a test) by ayardley : https://github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/695
16:37 alvis benabik: well, i remember thinking (when first starting out) about using it several times ...
16:37 alvis so, i think new folks tend to look at for submissions.
16:37 benabik alvis: I hadn't noticed it's existence until I was looking at docs/submission.pod
16:42 dalek parrot/ayardley/documentation_revisions: 52c654b | alvis++ | docs/revisions/docs/mans/vmspec/ (2 files):
16:42 dalek parrot/ayardley/documentation_revisions: Modifications to preface.pod and toc.pod
16:42 dalek parrot/ayardley/documentation_revisions: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/52c654b4dd
16:44 alvis crap! i was on origin/github-links and it pushed my documentation_revisions as well. hmm, (git just really troubles me.)
16:44 benabik I think it defaults to pushing all matching refs.
16:46 aloha (parrot/parrot) Issues closed : 695 (This is a test) by ayardley : https://github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/695
16:46 alvis benabik: yeah.
16:49 benabik I tend to do the verbose version: 'git push origin <branch>'
16:50 alvis benabik: i'll do that in the future. thanks. :)
16:53 Coke did someone give perljam commitbits without getting a parrot CLA from him?
16:56 moritz Coke: I kinda thought that PerlJam had a commit bit to the old parrot svn, so he must have had a signed CLA too, no?
17:00 PerlJam I did sign a CLA back in the day
17:04 * Coke wonders if he still has access to the list of CLAs.
17:05 Coke hurm. spreadsheet I have access to was last edited 757 days ago by particle.
17:06 Coke and you're on that ancient one, fwiw. ;)
17:10 PerlJam I thought I was feeling a little like a grey beard
17:12 PerlJam so ... what tickets *weren't* migrated to github?
17:13 PerlJam Looks like anything tagged experimental or deprecated.
17:14 PerlJam (at least)
17:15 benabik TT#2168 (Deprecate .file, .line, setline, and setfile) is gh-519 and is a depreciation...
17:17 benabik I think only open tickets got moved.
17:17 dalek parrot/github-links: 0654676 | duff++ | api.yaml:
17:17 dalek parrot/github-links: Change trac links for those that exist on github
17:17 dalek parrot/github-links: review: https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/06546768d9
17:18 dukeleto benabik: yes, only open TTs were migrated
17:24 eternaleye_ joined #parrot
17:25 NotFound Coke: sorry, I just assumed he had a CLA without asking.
17:25 PacoAir joined #parrot
17:26 wendar joined #parrot
17:27 Timbus joined #parrot
17:27 elmex joined #parrot
17:28 dukeleto so, am I the only person that see the Timer PMC tests hanging forever?
17:28 dukeleto It is driving me insane.
17:28 dukeleto Which is why I converted the tests from PASM to PIR yesterday, during my travel delirium.
17:28 ruoso joined #parrot
17:28 krunen joined #parrot
17:28 jlaire joined #parrot
17:29 benabik dukeleto: Do they run doing make test?  If so, then it's not hanging for me.
17:29 jevin joined #parrot
17:29 betterworld joined #parrot
17:29 ascent joined #parrot
17:29 Hunger joined #parrot
17:29 dukeleto benabik: yep, they are in test and coretest targets
17:30 dukeleto benabik: it only hangs on OS X Lion for me
17:30 benabik dukeleto: It runs on my Lion MBP
17:30 dukeleto benabik: with g++, not sure if I have tried with gcc
17:30 dukeleto benabik: which compiler you using?
17:30 benabik gcc
17:30 dukeleto also, i read src/scheduler.pmc and cried
17:30 dukeleto cried, cried, cried.
17:30 dukeleto it is amazing the Timer PMC works at all
17:30 * dukeleto has to shutdown for landing
17:31 ttbot joined #parrot
17:31 arnsholt joined #parrot
17:32 Maddingue joined #parrot
17:38 silug joined #parrot
17:41 alvis msg not_gerd Please see https://gist.github.com/1627750
17:41 aloha OK. I'll deliver the message.
17:50 bluescreen joined #parrot
17:50 alvis benabik/moritz: do either of you want to rewrite submissions.pod (and update its wiki) or should I?
17:53 benabik alvis: If you have the tuits, go for it.
17:53 * benabik has to get some "real" work done.
17:56 fperrad joined #parrot
17:57 alester joined #parrot
17:58 Timbus joined #parrot
17:58 atrodo joined #parrot
17:58 benabik dukeleto: Seems to work under g++ for me.  :-/
17:58 aloha joined #parrot
17:59 alvis benabik: ok. it's just a'bit more involved; thought it'd free you two up a'bit.
17:59 jlaire joined #parrot
18:00 jevin_ joined #parrot
18:00 Maddingue joined #parrot
18:01 zby_home joined #parrot
18:01 Hunger joined #parrot
18:02 p6eval joined #parrot
18:02 arnsholt joined #parrot
18:04 krunen joined #parrot
18:08 silug joined #parrot
18:09 alvis benabik++ # for trac -> github issues fixes
18:09 alvis PerlJam++ # for the catch!
18:10 dukeleto joined #parrot
18:11 alvis dukeleto: guess you safely landed :)
18:11 dukeleto alvis: +1 to rewriting submissions.pod
18:11 dukeleto alvis: yes, safe and sound and rocking some tethering action in the taxi to $work :)
18:12 * alvis thinks our bus-factor is too high.
18:13 dukeleto alvis: too low, you mean?
18:13 dukeleto alvis: usually a high bus number is good
18:13 dukeleto alvis: low bus numbers (like 1) are bad
18:15 alvis dukeleto: ha! yep! thinking obversly ;)
18:26 alvis dukeleto: do we have a 'main' github email account? something to which, e.g., 'parrotbug' reports could be sent?
18:27 moritz no; just don't allow email bug submissions. The web exists.
18:28 alvis moritz: ah. so ... bad idea then. ok.
18:29 dukeleto alvis: parrotbug should just make a github issue
18:29 dukeleto alvis: but that might be impossible. Not sure.
18:30 dukeleto alvis: the simplest thing is that parrotbug should email parrot-dev
18:30 dukeleto alvis: somebody will have to approve the emails, though
18:30 dukeleto alvis: in any case, i am very +1 to making parrotbug actually useful
18:34 PerlJam Can you attach files to a github issue like you could with trac?
18:34 alvis dukeleto: hmm, ... i think on that ...
18:35 alvis s/i/i'll/
18:39 Coke moritz: we absolutely allowed email bug reports.
18:40 moritz Coke: did that ever work reliably with trac?
18:40 Coke yes.
18:40 Coke every six months, someone would complain about it sucking that they had to authenticate, login to the web... and I'd point out that parrotbug still worked, and everyone would be very surprised. ;)
18:47 alvis well, since there seems to be a lack of consensus, i'll contact github support about it. they may already have a solution set.
18:49 Coke looks like email replies already work.
18:56 cotto ~~
18:56 Coke !!
19:03 GodFather joined #parrot
19:03 dalek rakudo/nom: aa1d8b6 | moritz++ | src/core/Range.pm:
19:03 dalek rakudo/nom: optimize Range.roll, and Range.pick if the number of range elems is much larger than the number of elements to pick
19:03 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/aa1d8b6451
19:07 contingencyplan joined #parrot
19:21 cotto #ps in 10
19:31 cotto #ps in now
19:42 mj41 joined #parrot
20:19 alvis cotto: sorry, i'm just now thinking about this: what do we do about http://trac.parrot.org/parrot/roadmap? ...
20:20 alvis do we want to kill references to this and put up something on the github wiki instead?
20:20 cotto alvis: I suspect that it's mostly of historical interest now
20:20 alvis cotto: so, should I just remove the reference in 'release_manager_guide.pod'?
20:21 cotto alvis: yes
20:21 benabik Github issues does appear to have a milestone function...
20:24 Coke parrot has never really dealt well with planned milestones.
20:25 cotto indeed
20:25 Coke so unless you have someone clamoring for them and devoting time to them, it's probably not worth setting up new infrastructure for that.
20:25 cotto +1
20:26 benabik Fair enough.  I just wanted to point out it was there if we wanted to use it.  :-)
20:27 alvis i'm also gonna remove references to trac for bug reports, et. al. (unless there's an objection)
20:27 cotto alvis: please do
20:27 benabik Less remove, more point to github.
20:28 Coke the only place I'd leave them is in the test suite if they are to closed bugs.
20:28 alvis benabik: agreed. :)
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: 0deac24 | moritz++ | src/core/control.pm:
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: try to fix sleep() with non-Num argument
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/0deac24dfe
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: 2fd18f4 | moritz++ | src/core/Range.pm:
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: fix Range.{roll,pick}
20:31 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/2fd18f4b66
21:02 cotto alvis: looks like the release is go.
21:03 dalek nqp: 08e07d7 | jonathan++ | src/Q (2 files):
21:03 dalek nqp: First crack at getting backtracking into subrules working. Needs testing with Rakudo yet.
21:03 dalek nqp: review: https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/08e07d777b
21:10 alvis cotto: ok. really, i just need the release so i can hand-walk the changes to 'parrot.github.com' and 'parrot-docs3'/'parrot-docs4' ...
21:10 alvis and, then, update 'release_manager_guide.pod' appropriately. so, thanks.
21:11 cotto whiteknight will be cutting it this evening, if all goes well
21:11 cotto all is expected to go well
21:11 alvis whiteknight++
21:12 alvis cotto++ # for making it all go!
21:12 cotto I just poked whiteknight++
21:22 perlite_ joined #parrot
21:50 dalek nqp: a2b60b7 | jonathan++ | src/QRegex/Cursor.nqp:
21:50 dalek nqp: Prevent a crash when building CAPHASH if one of the cstack entries is there solely for backtracking into rather than serving as a capture.
21:50 dalek nqp: review: https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/a2b60b77da
22:14 dalek nqp: c9fd128 | jonathan++ | src/QRegex/Cursor.nqp:
22:14 dalek nqp: Oops, I meant this...
22:14 dalek nqp: review: https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/c9fd128ac6
23:01 bacek joined #parrot
23:06 whiteknight joined #parrot
23:09 whiteknight Anybody who has additions to NEWS et al would do well to commit them soonish
23:14 donaldh joined #parrot
23:27 alvis msg dukeleto I think http://developer.github.com/v3/ -- specifically, section "<> Create an issue" at http://developer.github.com/v3/issues/ -- should do nicely for 'parrobug'. What do you think?
23:27 aloha OK. I'll deliver the message.
23:35 cotto alvis: the only problem with that is that we'd need to put the credentials in git
23:35 cotto other than that, it'd be perfect
23:37 alvis cotto: There's an OAuth2 protocol I'm looking at. It may be a solution. See http://developer.github.com/v3/oauth/
23:41 whiteknight joined #parrot
23:42 * whiteknight always forgets how long fulltest takes
23:43 cotto whiteknight: selective memory
23:48 whiteknight changelog this month is going to be...underwhelming
23:49 whiteknight tis the season for development to slow down, of course
23:51 dukeleto whiteknight: yeah
23:51 dukeleto whiteknight: are we still pre-release?
23:52 whiteknight yes, I'm working on the release now. I'm making a branch
23:52 dukeleto whiteknight: can i still add to NEWS?
23:52 dukeleto alvis: +1 to using the v3 issues api
23:52 whiteknight duke: I'll push my branch soon, so you can add to that
23:52 dukeleto alvis: one gotcha will be storing our authentication key in parrotbug
23:58 bacek joined #parrot

| Channels | #parrot index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

Parrot | source cross referenced