| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:02 |
|
Whiteknight joined #parrotsketch |
| 05:52 |
|
kurahaupo joined #parrotsketch |
| 07:14 |
|
cotto_w0rk joined #parrotsketch |
| 11:34 |
|
Whiteknight joined #parrotsketch |
| 14:18 |
|
Util joined #parrotsketch |
| 15:58 |
|
NotFound joined #parrotsketch |
| 16:52 |
|
fperrad joined #parrotsketch |
| 17:03 |
|
smash joined #parrotsketch |
| 17:10 |
|
darbelo joined #parrotsketch |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
# What I did: |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
* profiled pprof2cg (tuit were short this week) |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
# What I hope to do and how many tuits I expect to have: |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
* same as last week, hopefully with more tuits |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
# What could block my progress: |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
* rl |
| 17:17 |
cotto_work |
.eor |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
# What I did last weeks : |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
* Lua : rewrite my Test Suite in pure Lua |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
as an independent project, see http://testmore.luaforge.net/ |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
(include a Lua port of Test::More) |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
* load_language : converts WMLScript, Markdown & Lua |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
# What I must to do |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
* prepare a talk about Parrot for http://act.osdc.fr/osdc2009fr/ |
| 17:24 |
fperrad |
.eor |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
#did: |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Removed PIC. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Moved the JIT call frame builder into it's own file. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Gave the frame builder it's own configure probe. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Obliterated the rest of the JIT. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Removed the JIT-dependent exec core. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
#will try to: |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Go back to the strstart removing. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* More pmc_freeze.c cleanups |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
#Might block on: |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
* Tuit shortage. |
| 17:39 |
darbelo |
.eor |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
What I did: |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
* Applied some patches. |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
* Miscellaneous fixes. |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
* Diagnosed problem in MySql module. |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
What I will do: |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
* Fix problems that intereferes with MySql module, improve it. |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
Q2Q |
| 17:43 |
NotFound |
.eor |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
What I did in the last week: |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* building and full testing parrot on amd64 and i386 |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* fixing codetest/manifest_tests failures |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* testing language builds on latest parrot, mainly rakudo and partcl |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* worked on make cover - added more coverage and |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* got cover-clean to remove all files generated by make cover |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* except cover_db directory which is removed by make realclean |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
What I intend to do next week: |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* continue testing |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
* get fulltest to run all tests |
| 17:50 |
mikehh |
.eor |
| 17:59 |
dukelet0 |
'ello |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
What I did: |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* Working on blog post about the Parrot Shell |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* Benchmarking Euler problems on Parrot across released version |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* Working on the Blizkost test suite |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* Applying patches |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
Plan: |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* More of the same |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
Blocking on: |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
* Too damn nice outside in PDX. |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
.eor |
| 18:02 |
dukelet0 |
s/version/versions/ |
| 18:05 |
|
darbelo left #parrotsketch |
| 18:09 |
|
darbelo joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:20 |
|
chromatic joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:20 |
|
chromatic joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:21 |
chromatic |
I worked on optimizations and bug fixes. |
| 18:21 |
chromatic |
I helped remove the JIT. |
| 18:21 |
chromatic |
This coming week, I hope to remove more deprecated features and work on other optimizations. |
| 18:22 |
chromatic |
I also hope to document some of the slang primitives to help us figure out Lorito primitives. |
| 18:25 |
|
allison joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:27 |
Util |
# Done |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* TT#994 - Set up local git-svn clone for auto-prop experiment; experiment still in progress. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* TT#389 - Poked at pbc.c, trying to keep subs with :method out of the namespace. It poked back, hard. Traced to namespace.pmc add_to_class(). |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* Attended Atlanta LinuxFest. 500+ attendees. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
= Python had a *booth*, with full-color banner, staff answering questions, code and websites being demoed... |
| 18:27 |
Util |
@ Grrrr. Atlanta.pm would have staffed a Perl booth, if we had only known. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
= OTOH, a Webhosting booth gave away copies of 2009-09 LinuxProMagazine (issue 106), containing the "Birdsong" Parrot article. (Can't find it online, though) |
| 18:27 |
Util |
# Plan for next week: |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* Make SVN properties do-the-right-thing for `git-svn` users (TT#994). Should finish in the week, either in success or failure. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* Brain-dump last weeks research into TT#389. Continue poking; medium chance of success. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
# Blockers: |
| 18:27 |
Util |
* None; more tuits available this week. |
| 18:27 |
Util |
.end |
| 18:30 |
mikehh |
I make it time |
| 18:30 |
chromatic |
Hello. |
| 18:30 |
darbelo |
Hola. |
| 18:30 |
mikehh |
Hi there |
| 18:30 |
chromatic |
Let's review last week's goals. |
| 18:30 |
chromatic |
How did we do removing the old JIT? |
| 18:31 |
mikehh |
most of it gone |
| 18:31 |
fperrad |
hello |
| 18:31 |
cotto_work |
hio |
| 18:31 |
NotFound |
hola |
| 18:31 |
darbelo |
The part that still there is the onw we want to keep. |
| 18:32 |
darbelo |
I'd call it 'succesful' |
| 18:32 |
chromatic |
How much refactoring is left of what remains? |
| 18:32 |
mikehh |
me too |
| 18:33 |
Util |
hi |
| 18:33 |
chromatic |
How about improving the test coverage of Exception? |
| 18:35 |
|
kj joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:35 |
mikehh |
make cover reports 85.9% on exception.c |
| 18:35 |
NotFound |
I've done a bit just a few moments ago |
| 18:36 |
|
allison joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:36 |
mikehh |
95.4% on exceptionhandler.c |
| 18:37 |
chromatic |
Can you make a list of what we need to get to 100% on the wiki? |
| 18:37 |
mikehh |
I'll give it a go |
| 18:38 |
chromatic |
How about MultiSub? Did anyone work on that? |
| 18:38 |
|
jrtayloriv joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:39 |
Util |
multisub.{c,pmc} had no change in coverage numbers from r40951 to r41406. |
| 18:40 |
chromatic |
Let's keep it on the list for next week then. |
| 18:40 |
chromatic |
How did we do on branch merges? |
| 18:40 |
mikehh |
good |
| 18:40 |
cotto_work |
thanks to bacek and his git-svn magic |
| 18:40 |
mikehh |
especially kill branches |
| 18:40 |
darbelo |
gc-refactor merged, kill_pic branched and merged, kill_jit branched_and merged |
| 18:40 |
NotFound |
kill++ |
| 18:41 |
darbelo |
all dead now. |
| 18:41 |
chromatic |
Do we have upcoming branches to merge? |
| 18:41 |
jrtayloriv |
(sorry I'm late -- howdy) |
| 18:42 |
allison |
(looks like my connection dropped off before my report made it into the channel, can fill in later) |
| 18:43 |
darbelo |
no branch other than pcc has commits in the last month. Merges look unlikely. |
| 18:43 |
chromatic |
Anything else to review from last week, tech-wise? |
| 18:44 |
Util |
RT#53302 says that the `nsentry` branch might be removed after a `diff` of it is added to TT#389. |
| 18:44 |
cotto_work |
q1q |
| 18:44 |
chromatic |
Okay. |
| 18:44 |
NotFound |
q2q |
| 18:45 |
chromatic |
Let's put MultiSub on the testing queue for this week. |
| 18:45 |
chromatic |
Let's review milestones. Can someone who's not at a conference go through this list? https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/report/14 |
| 18:45 |
chromatic |
I have done a bit of work on pruning C data structures; will mail the list later. |
| 18:46 |
allison_ |
is vtable swap going to be worked on this month? |
| 18:47 |
allison_ |
i.e. should we reschedule or drop the task? |
| 18:47 |
allison_ |
(it may end up being irrelevant, if lorito goes as planned) |
| 18:48 |
chromatic |
It's become less of a priority, thanks to other changes. |
| 18:49 |
allison_ |
bump after 2.0? or drop from roadmap tasks? |
| 18:49 |
chromatic |
Let's defer it until 2.1. |
| 18:49 |
allison_ |
2.2 it is |
| 18:49 |
mikehh |
TT #566, #567, #568 are all hll_interop stuff (pmichaud) |
| 18:49 |
NotFound |
Looks like almost no one knows what needs to be done. |
| 18:49 |
* dukelet0 |
looks at milestones |
| 18:50 |
allison_ |
actually, 2.6, since we haven't broken out the post-2.0 milestones yet |
| 18:50 |
dukelet0 |
i will add enough docs to the parrot_debugger to close before 1.7 |
| 18:50 |
allison_ |
the hll_interop task needs a revisit |
| 18:51 |
allison_ |
as in "what's been done, what needs to be done, what's blocking?" |
| 18:51 |
Util |
TT#600 (bytecode testing framework) needs more detail before I would tackle it. |
| 18:51 |
allison_ |
Util: would you feel comfortable putting together a first draft of what you think might need to be done, so the group can expand/discuss? |
| 18:51 |
Util |
Doh! |
| 18:52 |
mikehh |
the testr option compiles to bytecode and then tests it |
| 18:52 |
allison_ |
The basic task is just "make it possible to test a bytecode file" |
| 18:52 |
Util |
I will make a first draft. |
| 18:53 |
allison_ |
Util: thanks! |
| 18:53 |
Util |
...if you tell me what you are testing for - loadability? canonical structure? |
| 18:53 |
mikehh |
rakudo also compiles to .pbc as well |
| 18:53 |
allison_ |
Util: more general than that |
| 18:53 |
Util |
OK |
| 18:53 |
allison_ |
Util: we should be able to run any test we currently run in PIR from a bytecode file instead |
| 18:54 |
allison_ |
(that's the only way to be sure the bytecode is working) |
| 18:54 |
Util |
Aha! got it! |
| 18:55 |
NotFound |
We are not. The problem of not storing the encoding of constant strings is still unresolved. |
| 18:55 |
allison_ |
on seed libraries, how's the Aviary, Plumage stuff coming? |
| 18:55 |
allison_ |
should we reschedule/rename this task to fit that work? |
| 18:55 |
fperrad |
TT #1052 is needed |
| 18:56 |
allison_ |
fperrad: for the testing task? |
| 18:56 |
darbelo |
japhb was working on bootstraping some aviary stuff. |
| 18:57 |
|
pmichaud joined #parrotsketch |
| 18:58 |
fperrad |
allison_, yes, TT #1052 is : Add --target=pbc to HLLCompiler |
| 18:58 |
mikehh |
assigned to pmichaud |
| 18:59 |
allison_ |
fperrad: aye, took a look, it's not an absolute requirement for bytecode testing (since it could always be done in a separate step), but nice to have |
| 18:59 |
NotFound |
allison_: Can we host some modules at svn.parrot.org ? We were talking yesterday about MySql module leaving hist nest i examples. |
| 18:59 |
pmichaud |
right, I can't imagine that TT #1052 would be a requirement |
| 19:00 |
pmichaud |
clearly we can produce .pbc without having --target=pbc |
| 19:00 |
allison_ |
NotFound: we could... though it might be better to follow the approach we've taken with languages |
| 19:00 |
fperrad |
sorry, I think as HLL implementor |
| 19:01 |
allison_ |
NotFound: where each group of modules keeps it's own repository |
| 19:01 |
allison_ |
NotFound: (in the source control tool of their choice) |
| 19:01 |
NotFound |
allison_: When/if it gets mature enough and more people work on it, sure. |
| 19:03 |
allison_ |
NotFound: we can create another svn repo easily enough on svn.parrot.org. Will it be used by enough modules to be worth it? |
| 19:03 |
allison_ |
(input from others on channel?) |
| 19:04 |
NotFound |
allison_: main points are: be easy for me to work on it, and have a url that plumage can use. |
| 19:04 |
|
Coke joined #parrotsketch |
| 19:04 |
* Coke |
goes whoops. |
| 19:04 |
pmichaud |
I would just do modules in github, sourceforge, etc. |
| 19:04 |
allison_ |
NotFound: plumage can use any URL, it's a distributed module index |
| 19:04 |
dukelet0 |
github++ |
| 19:04 |
pmichaud |
pick the one you're most productive with |
| 19:05 |
NotFound |
Being easy for me excludes git. |
| 19:05 |
darbelo |
NotFound: google code has svn and is pretty easy to set up. |
| 19:05 |
pmichaud |
yes, googlecode is also good. that's what partcl is using |
| 19:05 |
pmichaud |
and pynie |
| 19:05 |
NotFound |
Ok, I'll give it a try. |
| 19:06 |
allison_ |
questions, NotFound you had 2 queued, was that one? |
| 19:06 |
NotFound |
allison_: TT #1057, subsystem prefix for list.c functions. |
| 19:07 |
* allison_ |
looking |
| 19:07 |
NotFound |
Also MySql related, BTW |
| 19:08 |
chromatic |
I prefer Parrot_list as a prefix; it's only one character longer and it's much clearer. |
| 19:08 |
allison_ |
NotFound: lists aren't a specific enough subsystem |
| 19:08 |
chromatic |
... but I'm not sure we *need* those functions in general. |
| 19:08 |
allison_ |
so, Parrot_pmc |
| 19:09 |
NotFound |
The api page says 2 or 3 letters |
| 19:09 |
NotFound |
chromatic: they are used. |
| 19:09 |
allison_ |
(or, more accurately, lists aren't a subsystem) |
| 19:10 |
chromatic |
I know we use them now, but I think they're only used in a few places and largely vestigial. |
| 19:10 |
NotFound |
allison_: Parrot_pmc_list_... ? |
| 19:10 |
allison_ |
NotFound: that would work, or Parrot_pmc_array |
| 19:10 |
NotFound |
chromatic: maybe, but I need to rename it, is blocking MySql work. |
| 19:11 |
allison_ |
NotFound: go ahead, it falls under the general deprecation item |
| 19:11 |
darbelo |
Rename them now and open ticket for their obliteration? |
| 19:12 |
mikehh |
kill++ |
| 19:12 |
allison_ |
darbelo: yes, or at least a ticket to check and see if they can die |
| 19:13 |
pmichaud |
if rakudo uses them (unlikely), I'm okay with them renaming. |
| 19:13 |
NotFound |
I think is only use by the Array pmc and imcc |
| 19:14 |
allison_ |
NotFound: there's a good chance they should be refactored into Array's code, then |
| 19:14 |
mikehh |
BTW Coke++ for closing RT tickets and getting others to |
| 19:15 |
allison_ |
NotFound: for now, rename, enter a ticket to explore what to do next |
| 19:15 |
pmichaud |
Yes, Coke++ |
| 19:15 |
NotFound |
Ok |
| 19:15 |
pmichaud |
+1 |
| 19:15 |
NotFound |
Next question: the exception thrown by the exit opcode is resumable? |
| 19:16 |
Tene |
NotFound: anything thrown by throw_from_op is resumable, but throw_from_c or whatever isn't. |
| 19:16 |
Tene |
so, probably yes |
| 19:16 |
NotFound |
Actually is, but I doubt any code that uses it expects to be resumed. |
| 19:16 |
Coke |
I can see wanting an on-exit handler. |
| 19:16 |
Coke |
(which might be a non-sequitor.) |
| 19:16 |
Tene |
Coke: that would invoke some other code, but wouldn't resume. |
| 19:17 |
NotFound |
The real question is: can we get rid of the continuation created in it? |
| 19:17 |
Tene |
NotFound: why? |
| 19:17 |
allison_ |
NotFound: the spec lists it as "handleable", but doesn't mark "resumable" |
| 19:17 |
NotFound |
Tene: to avoid debugging strange failures caused by a resume. |
| 19:17 |
pmichaud |
(on-exit handler) In general, we want to have an "on-exit" possibility for all subs, not just main |
| 19:18 |
dukelet0 |
pmichaud: like "after" in Moose ? |
| 19:18 |
pmichaud |
dukelet0: perhaps. In Perl 6 it's "leave" |
| 19:18 |
Tene |
NotFound: If someone is trying to resume an exit exception, I don't see any reason to disallow it. It's just an exception like any other. |
| 19:18 |
pmichaud |
dukelet0: I think that "after" in Moose is more of a wrapper than an on-exit handler |
| 19:20 |
NotFound |
Tene: if we allow it to be resumed, every time you use exit you must add code to handle the possible resume. |
| 19:20 |
pmichaud |
NotFound: that's not much different than any other "throw" situation. |
| 19:21 |
NotFound |
pmichaud: then kill the opcode and use throw |
| 19:21 |
Tene |
Do we also need to always check that a sub that we're invoking still exists, just because there's the possibility that someone has deleted it? |
| 19:22 |
pmichaud |
....deleted it? |
| 19:22 |
pmichaud |
how does one "delete" a referenced sub? |
| 19:22 |
Tene |
I'm pretty sure that I remember doing that... remove it from the namespace. |
| 19:22 |
pmichaud |
if anything has a pointer to the sub, it should still exist. |
| 19:23 |
allison_ |
NotFound: are you asking whether we should add functionality to exit? or remove existing functionality? |
| 19:23 |
dukelet0 |
pmichaud: namespace elements can be deleted |
| 19:23 |
pmichaud |
that would include any contexts, outer lexical references, etc. |
| 19:23 |
Tene |
It was just an example of doing something stupid an dbroken. |
| 19:23 |
pmichaud |
dukelet0: deleting a namespace element doesn't delete the sub. |
| 19:23 |
pmichaud |
at least, it shouldn't delete the sub |
| 19:23 |
NotFound |
allison_: I see it at removing existing unfunctionality. |
| 19:23 |
NotFound |
s/at/as |
| 19:23 |
dukelet0 |
pmichaud: we should have a test for that |
| 19:23 |
Tene |
and resuming an exit exception would fall into that category. |
| 19:24 |
Tene |
pmichaud: there are plenty of places in PCT and rakudo where functions are fetched from namespaces. That's all I was thinking of. |
| 19:24 |
NotFound |
Tene: no, faliling to find a sunb throws an exception, resuming an exit can give a segmentation fault. |
| 19:24 |
pmichaud |
assuming that an exit exception has a resume entry (a Continuation), that continuation would reference the sub, and the sub would therefor be marked as live and not be gc'ed |
| 19:24 |
Tene |
Please ignore my chosen example. It wasn't a good idea. :) |
| 19:25 |
pmichaud |
i.e., the Sub PMC would exist simply because there's a Continuation/Exception that continues to reference it |
| 19:25 |
NotFound |
Is valid code to have an exit at the end of a bytecode segment, and in fact we have examples and tests like that. |
| 19:26 |
pmichaud |
but going a bit further (more) |
| 19:26 |
pmichaud |
it wouldn't bother me if "exit" throws an unresumable exception. If someone needs a resumable exception, we have "throw" for that. |
| 19:27 |
NotFound |
pmichaud: that's my point, if for some you want a resumable exit you can throw an exit exception |
| 19:27 |
NotFound |
But the current, and what most people will expect for the exit opcode, is to not needing to care for resume. |
| 19:28 |
pmichaud |
but that's true for many 'throw' usages as well |
| 19:28 |
pmichaud |
i.e., many people assume a thrown exception won't resume. |
| 19:28 |
pmichaud |
(not a counter-argument, just pointing out that throw and exit aren't any different in this respect) |
| 19:29 |
allison_ |
I'm okay with non-resumable exit |
| 19:29 |
allison_ |
I'm about to have to leave for lunch |
| 19:29 |
pmichaud |
otoh, it seems to me that exit could use the same logic as throw |
| 19:30 |
cotto_work |
allison_, could you look over GitObjections on the wiki in the near future and make sure all your objections are present? |
| 19:30 |
NotFound |
pmichaud: Given that few languages have resumable exceptions, yes, most people don't expect. But that's only a documentation and examples problem. |
| 19:30 |
Tene |
pmichaud: it currently does |
| 19:30 |
allison_ |
did cotto have a question before we go? |
| 19:30 |
cotto_work |
that was it |
| 19:30 |
allison_ |
cotto: yes, I'll look over it |
| 19:30 |
pmichaud |
Tene: then why is there an issue with exit and not with throw? |
| 19:30 |
cotto_work |
thank |
| 19:30 |
cotto_work |
eoq |
| 19:31 |
cotto_work |
s/k/ks/ |
| 19:31 |
NotFound |
It currently does, the point is to change the current behaviour and docuemnt it. |
| 19:31 |
allison_ |
pmichaud: I mainly see it as a question of "why have exit if it does the same thing as throw?" |
| 19:31 |
allison_ |
but, I don't have a strong opinion here |
| 19:31 |
pmichaud |
allison_: that's reasonable to me also |
| 19:31 |
allison_ |
NotFound: it would be subject to a deprecation cycle |
| 19:31 |
pmichaud |
what are we changing about the current behavior, then, if it's already the same as throw? |
| 19:31 |
NotFound |
The point of using exit is shortness. The need to be ready for resume is against that. |
| 19:32 |
pmichaud |
you're trying to make it *not* the same as throw? what's the purpose of that? |
| 19:32 |
allison_ |
so, you can deprecate it and see if anyone complains between now and then |
| 19:32 |
Tene |
NotFound: remove lines 890,893,894 from src/ops/core.ops |
| 19:32 |
allison_ |
have to run, thanks everybody! |
| 19:32 |
Coke |
allison_: ~~ |
| 19:33 |
Tene |
pmichaud: his point is that 'exit' has different expectations from 'throw', and that resuming from an exception thrown by 'exit' is unlikely to be correct in any situation. |
| 19:33 |
Tene |
I don't know how much I agree with it. |
| 19:33 |
NotFound |
Tene: and hard to debug if it happens. |
| 19:33 |
Tene |
NotFound: identical debugging situation to any other resumed exception. |
| 19:34 |
Tene |
as well, IMO, if you're resuming from an exit exception, you had better know what you're doing. There are well-documented ways to prevent your handler from catching exit exceptions. |
| 19:35 |
Tene |
I don't see how 'exit' is a special case here. |
| 19:35 |
pmichaud |
I have to go as well. It feels odd to treat 'exit' as a special case, although I see the point. |
| 19:35 |
Tene |
IMO, it's the same as 'print' vs 'say' |
| 19:35 |
pmichaud |
bbl |
| 19:35 |
NotFound |
Tene: Is a different opcode, that's spècial enough for me. |
| 19:36 |
Coke |
btw, there is a ticket somewhere where allison has proposed removing say. =-) |
| 19:36 |
Tene |
'say' used to be a different opcode, iirc. |
| 19:36 |
Coke |
say used to be PIR magic. then it was an opcode. |
| 19:36 |
Coke |
(and before that, it was just print, no newlines) |
| 19:37 |
Tene |
and before that, you didn't even have 'print', you just had to call a method on STDOUT? |
| 19:37 |
Tene |
;) |
| 19:37 |
* japhb |
appears for long enough to say: |
| 19:37 |
japhb |
Don't kill say. |
| 19:37 |
japhb |
My life as a PIR debugger would just be more painful with only print. |
| 19:37 |
Coke |
(oh, I'm not planning on it.) |
| 19:37 |
Tene |
There are quite a few opcodes that could be replaced by method calls, iirc. |
| 19:37 |
japhb |
Two lines of code every time I wanted to print the value of a register. |
| 19:39 |
Tene |
NotFound: It looks like allison has OK'd it, as long as it goes through a deprecation cycle, and nobody else will complain too loudly if you want to do it. |
| 19:39 |
NotFound |
But you are complaining ;) |
| 19:39 |
Tene |
NotFound: Please make a ticket and attach the patch I proposed, and list the date after which it can be applied. |
| 19:39 |
NotFound |
Tene: ok |
| 19:39 |
Tene |
and list it in the deprecated whatever place. |
| 19:39 |
NotFound |
EOQ |
| 19:41 |
mikehh |
anyone got anything else to say or is that a wrap-up |
| 19:41 |
Tene |
Sounds like we're done. |
| 19:43 |
dukelet0 |
The dishes are done, man. |
| 19:44 |
|
Util left #parrotsketch |
| 19:45 |
|
darbelo left #parrotsketch |
| 19:46 |
|
NotFound left #parrotsketch |
| 19:46 |
|
fperrad left #parrotsketch |
| 20:04 |
|
chromatic joined #parrotsketch |
| 20:11 |
|
chromatic left #parrotsketch |
| 20:45 |
|
jrtayloriv left #parrotsketch |
| 20:49 |
|
cotto_work joined #parrotsketch |
| 22:09 |
|
allison_ joined #parrotsketch |
| 22:09 |
allison_ |
Pasting report dropped by poor network access earlier: |
| 22:09 |
allison_ |
- Gave a talk at the JVM Languages Summit. |
| 22:09 |
allison_ |
- Tested Parrot on Mac OS 10.6, filed some tickets (warnings and possible future development). |
| 22:09 |
allison_ |
- Ran some simple benchmarks on the pcc branch, show the speed is about equal to current trunk. |
| 22:09 |
allison_ |
- Talked with chromatic about project roles and responsibilities, a "Dev Coach" role. |
