| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 08:11 |
|
ribasushi joined #pdl |
| 10:44 |
|
drrho joined #pdl |
| 12:28 |
|
drrho joined #pdl |
| 13:34 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal created config-devel-checklib (+1 new commit): http://git.io/xRbN |
| 13:34 |
opkick |
pdl/config-devel-checklib 52c7336 Zakariyya Mughal: remove Devel::CheckLib from inc/... |
| 13:35 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal opened pull request #22: remove Devel::CheckLib from inc/ (master...config-devel-checklib) http://git.io/xRNn |
| 13:43 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #21: Regarding the failed build, this is only failing because #18 hasn't been merged yet. http://git.io/xRxM |
| 14:26 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #22: Regarding the failed build, this is only failing because #18 hasn't been merged yet. http://git.io/x03d |
| 14:29 |
sivoais |
vsearch needs better docs. I'm looking into that today <https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/359/> |
| 14:54 |
opkick |
[pdl] coveralls comment on issue #22: |
| 18:17 |
|
rindolf joined #pdl |
| 19:58 |
sivoais |
I'm compiling some tools from other labs and it makes me feel that devops for science would fill a much needed niche |
| 20:00 |
mohawk |
that sounds like PDL/Puppet? |
| 20:00 |
sivoais |
yeah and Alien :-) |
| 20:01 |
sivoais |
I haven't used all of these configuration management tools, but from looking over all of them, my favourite is CFEngine ;-) |
| 20:01 |
sivoais |
"looking over" means just seeing the design and feature lists :-P |
| 20:04 |
mohawk |
it's time to start merging the great stuff we've done |
| 20:04 |
mohawk |
they've had their cooling-off |
| 20:04 |
mohawk |
HOWEVER |
| 20:04 |
mohawk |
i'll catch up on sivoais's emails and whatnot first |
| 20:05 |
mohawk |
there will be a new dmake coming out in a shortish time period |
| 20:05 |
mohawk |
which is exciting |
| 20:32 |
mohawk |
i'm struggling to see the remaining relevance of the SF "bugs" list |
| 20:32 |
mohawk |
we fix the bugs, they're not closed |
| 20:33 |
Mithaldu |
poke the ones that should be closed and/or ask for a bug janitor bit |
| 20:34 |
mohawk |
he already did poke |
| 20:34 |
Mithaldu |
link? |
| 20:34 |
mohawk |
see the pdl-devel archive today |
| 20:35 |
Mithaldu |
also, i hope you'll be releasing an Alien::dmake |
| 20:35 |
sivoais |
it's actually not in the pdl-devel archive. You have to subscribe to the bug component of SF. It's really confusing. |
| 20:35 |
Mithaldu |
i thought you poked a bug in the bug tracker? |
| 20:35 |
Mithaldu |
why are you telling me to go to a mailing list? |
| 20:35 |
mohawk |
he did that too |
| 20:36 |
mohawk |
look at the bugs/ website, it shows "updated" |
| 20:36 |
mohawk |
sivoais, aha - my bad |
| 20:36 |
Mithaldu |
https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/374/ |
| 20:36 |
Mithaldu |
this one? |
| 20:36 |
Mithaldu |
that may be patched, but not released |
| 20:36 |
sivoais |
yeah. I already posted to the mailing list. I wanted to see if posting to the bugs would get some traction |
| 20:36 |
sivoais |
yeah, I need feedback |
| 20:37 |
Mithaldu |
the _11 fail is more interesting |
| 20:37 |
Mithaldu |
but now i'm grumbly i had to go look |
| 20:37 |
Mithaldu |
and guess what the fuck you're talking about |
| 20:37 |
mohawk |
so subscribe to the bug museum, as i've just decided to call it |
| 20:38 |
Mithaldu |
again, no link |
| 20:38 |
Mithaldu |
it's like you're trying to piss me off |
| 20:38 |
Mithaldu |
i assume you mean this? https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/pdl-devel/ |
| 20:38 |
sivoais |
[[Perl Data Language / Bugs / #350 Modules using PDL::Slatec will get installed even if Slatec is disabled|https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/350/]] |
| 20:38 |
sivoais |
[[Perl Data Language / Bugs / #374 CONFIGURE_REQUIRES => Devel::CheckLib|https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/374/]] |
| 20:38 |
sivoais |
[[Perl Data Language / Bugs / #346 ExtUtils::F77 dependency causing problems for CPAN install|https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/346/]] |
| 20:38 |
Mithaldu |
it contains no mention of bug 372 |
| 20:39 |
sivoais |
sorry, I need to turn those to better URIs... |
| 20:39 |
Mithaldu |
sivoais: 374 is not fixed, since it's not released |
| 20:39 |
* sivoais |
goes to fumble with urititle script |
| 20:39 |
mohawk |
sivoais, please don't open any more SF bug tickets |
| 20:39 |
mohawk |
use gh issues |
| 20:39 |
mohawk |
in fact, better than museum |
| 20:39 |
mohawk |
mausoleum |
| 20:40 |
sivoais |
Mithaldu: I didn't say it was fixed. I just said I had a patch :-) |
| 20:40 |
Mithaldu |
mohawk: you're helping yourself in an anti-fashion by being intentionally offensive |
| 20:40 |
Mithaldu |
sivoais |
| 20:40 |
sivoais |
O_o |
| 20:40 |
Mithaldu |
right, i came away with the impression that fixed bugs were left open en masse, from earlier comments |
| 20:40 |
Mithaldu |
(entered too early, sorry) |
| 20:41 |
Mithaldu |
mohawk: can't you close bugs with your developer bit on pdl? |
| 20:42 |
sivoais |
yeah, I only commented on ones that were marked as open and should be going to pending-fixed or fixed |
| 20:42 |
sivoais |
since the stuff has been merged |
| 20:42 |
Mithaldu |
ok :) |
| 20:42 |
mohawk |
Mithaldu, that's a good question |
| 20:43 |
Mithaldu |
then i think you need to bother mohawk to try and flex his dev bit |
| 20:43 |
mohawk |
i think we're only devs, not admins, so we can't |
| 20:43 |
mohawk |
sivoais has one too |
| 20:43 |
Mithaldu |
didn't see him in the list |
| 20:43 |
mohawk |
Mithaldu, should i cry and stamp my feet and demand people give me urls instead? :-) |
| 20:44 |
Mithaldu |
mohawk: yeah, you know what, see you later, i don't need you to be dumb at me too |
| 21:10 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #2: Is this PR still valid? http://git.io/xgeN |
| 21:10 |
sivoais |
it'd be nice if the notifications gave more info than the issue number |
| 21:20 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #2: Not as it stands - look at all those "merge" instead of rebasing! http://git.io/xgkl |
| 21:23 |
mohawk |
i'm going to make a new PR out of #2 |
| 21:32 |
mohawk |
my god, the mess people can make when they don't know anything about git |
| 21:44 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #23: SF#147 closing TriD window kills perldl shell http://git.io/xgcn |
| 21:45 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #24: SF#210 default PDL build output too long http://git.io/xgcB |
| 21:45 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #25: SF#238 NiceSlice affects code where it should not http://git.io/xgcK |
| 21:45 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #26: SF#254 online docs don't link to functions in other PDL modules http://git.io/xgc9 |
| 21:46 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #27: SF#268 PLplot still unusable with X http://git.io/xgch |
| 21:46 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #28: SF#274 'help funname' fails to show multiple function names http://git.io/xgCJ |
| 21:46 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #29: SF#308 propagate badflag with .= http://git.io/xgCZ |
| 21:46 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #30: SF#322 PDL::Demos system needs overhaul http://git.io/xgC8 |
| 21:47 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #31: SF#324 PDL re-install wipes out non-core docs http://git.io/xgCu |
| 21:47 |
mohawk |
oh god, t/ops.t doesn't even use Test.pm |
| 21:47 |
mohawk |
it manually prints out "1..44" |
| 21:47 |
* mohawk |
weeps |
| 21:47 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #32: SF#330 NiceSlice can get confused by comments to cause compilation errors http://git.io/xgCi |
| 21:47 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #33: SF#332 "isn't numeric in null operation" warning could be more helpful http://git.io/xgC5 |
| 21:47 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #34: SF#334 Test coverage is incomplete http://git.io/xgWe |
| 21:48 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #35: SF#339 PDL::Complex support is inconsistent and incomplete http://git.io/xgWk |
| 21:48 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #36: SF#340 orover of byte data returns long type http://git.io/xgW3 |
| 21:48 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #37: SF#343 longlong constructor and display lose digits due to implicit double precision conversions http://git.io/xgWC |
| 21:48 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #38: SF#346 ExtUtils::F77 dependency causing problems for CPAN install http://git.io/xgWu |
| 21:48 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #39: SF#347 t/pdl_from_string.t has a failure if BADVAL_NAN=1 http://git.io/xgWr |
| 21:49 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #40: SF#350 Modules using PDL::Slatec will get installed even if Slatec is disabled http://git.io/xgWi |
| 21:49 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #41: SF#353 imag2d not 'use warnings' safe and no way to disable twiddle http://git.io/xgWy |
| 21:49 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #42: SF#354 filter demo list by actually available http://git.io/xgWb |
| 21:49 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #43: SF#359 Improved documentation for vsearch http://git.io/xglJ |
| 21:49 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #44: SF#363 PP "OtherPars" namespace is not clean http://git.io/xglL |
| 21:50 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #45: SF#364 type promotion in whistogram is based upon the index, not the weight http://git.io/xglO |
| 21:50 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #46: SF#366 many warnings in t/transform.t with use strict; use warnings; http://git.io/xgln |
| 21:50 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #47: SF#367 BAD value parsing breakage http://git.io/xgl0 |
| 21:50 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #48: SF#368 PDL::Slatec::polyfit ignores incorrect length of weight piddle; passes garbage to slatec polfit http://git.io/xglr |
| 21:50 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #49: SF#372 2.007_11 fails on MS Windows 64bit http://git.io/xglM |
| 21:51 |
opkick |
[pdl] perldl-bot opened issue #50: SF#374 CONFIGURE_REQUIRES => Devel::CheckLib http://git.io/xgl9 |
| 21:53 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #50: See PR #22 http://git.io/xg8b |
| 21:55 |
mohawk |
sivoais++ |
| 21:56 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #26: See <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.pdl.devel/6292> http://git.io/xgBQ |
| 22:04 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 created hainest-assgn_badflag (+1 new commit): http://git.io/xgun |
| 22:04 |
opkick |
pdl/hainest-assgn_badflag 2193f11 Tim Haines: Add propagation of badflag with .= (Ops::assgn) for sf.net bug 3543056. |
| 22:05 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 opened pull request #51: Add propagation of badflag with .= (Ops::assgn) for sf.net bug 3543056. (master...hainest-assgn_badflag) http://git.io/xgux |
| 22:09 |
sivoais |
look at <https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/issues> now |
| 22:10 |
mohawk |
ok |
| 22:10 |
sivoais |
now we need to triage them |
| 22:11 |
sivoais |
difficulty:{easy,medium,hard} ? |
| 22:11 |
mohawk |
is there any more migration we need to do? |
| 22:11 |
sivoais |
nope |
| 22:11 |
mohawk |
no, just milestones |
| 22:12 |
mohawk |
so we need to make all the SF pri 6+, milestones for 2.008 |
| 22:12 |
sivoais |
ok |
| 22:12 |
mohawk |
then we can use the feature to track how close we are |
| 22:12 |
sivoais |
gimme a few |
| 22:12 |
mohawk |
ok |
| 22:12 |
mohawk |
suggest closing the ones that are merged |
| 22:12 |
mohawk |
so SF363 for starters |
| 22:13 |
sivoais |
mohawk: could you do that and point to where it was merged. Just follow the SF links. I think I linked them up |
| 22:14 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 opened pull request #52: longlong-double-fix resurrection part 1 (master...lldfp1) http://git.io/xgaV |
| 22:15 |
mohawk |
wilco |
| 22:16 |
mohawk |
wait, what do you mean by "point to where it was merged"? |
| 22:17 |
mohawk |
sivoais, ^ |
| 22:18 |
sivoais |
mohawk: I link to them in a comment |
| 22:18 |
mohawk |
yes, i got taht |
| 22:19 |
mohawk |
you want me to "point to where it was merged" |
| 22:19 |
sivoais |
so just link to the MR |
| 22:19 |
mohawk |
what do you mean |
| 22:19 |
mohawk |
how about i link to the commit instead |
| 22:19 |
sivoais |
that works too |
| 22:19 |
sivoais |
:-) |
| 22:19 |
mohawk |
ok |
| 22:20 |
mohawk |
i want to merge travis-ci-more so we can rebase the other 4 and get actual real travis results |
| 22:20 |
mohawk |
rather than the false negative we see now |
| 22:20 |
mohawk |
unless you say otherwise, i'll JFDI once i've updated the issues |
| 22:20 |
sivoais |
how many days have gone by? |
| 22:22 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #29: Is this addressed by #51? http://git.io/xgof |
| 22:23 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #17: @zmughal could you ticklist this and bring up to date? http://git.io/xgou |
| 22:27 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #39: Fixed in #18. http://git.io/xg60 |
| 22:29 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 closed issue #40: SF#350 Modules using PDL::Slatec will get installed even if Slatec is disabled http://git.io/xgWi |
| 22:29 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #40: Fixed in 1ca5d227dda67fbbfb2734ef28906a59a0f07766. http://git.io/xgiu |
| 22:29 |
mohawk |
2 or so |
| 22:30 |
mohawk |
and various individuals have commentated on our other PR, the hdf4 thing |
| 22:30 |
mohawk |
silence = assent here |
| 22:33 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 closed issue #41: SF#353 imag2d not 'use warnings' safe and no way to disable twiddle http://git.io/xgWy |
| 22:34 |
mohawk |
ok, i'm done with the issue updating |
| 22:34 |
mohawk |
any objections to me merging the travis-ci-more branch? |
| 22:34 |
mohawk |
jberger, sivoais ^ |
| 22:40 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #51: I believe this needs to only run when `WITH_BADVAL=1`. I don't think the test does so yet. http://git.io/xgDy |
| 22:41 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #51: We'll be able to tell more easily once #18 is merged and we rebase against it. http://git.io/xgS3 |
| 22:42 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #41: I see a `use strict`, but no `use warnings`. http://git.io/xgSP |
| 22:44 |
sivoais |
mohawk: I'd like to of course. And the changes in there are not breaking code as evidenced by the Travis builds |
| 22:44 |
mohawk |
time to JFDI |
| 22:44 |
sivoais |
mohawk: can we at least get a test of everything on Windows? |
| 22:44 |
mohawk |
everything? |
| 22:45 |
sivoais |
nah, just a regular build |
| 22:45 |
mohawk |
grin |
| 22:45 |
mohawk |
ok - a build of what, though? the t-c-m branch? |
| 22:45 |
sivoais |
5.10 WITH_BADVAL=1 t-c-m branch |
| 22:45 |
sivoais |
or higher Perl if that is a pain |
| 22:45 |
mohawk |
5.10 isn't happening, but 5.20 |
| 22:45 |
mohawk |
on it |
| 22:46 |
opkick |
[pdl] zmughal comment on issue #17: I shall http://git.io/xgHn |
| 22:48 |
mohawk |
sivoais++ |
| 22:51 |
sivoais |
mohawk: <https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/issues/41> |
| 22:51 |
mohawk |
i saw your comment here |
| 22:52 |
mohawk |
that would really be part of a general strict/warnings blitz |
| 22:52 |
mohawk |
if chm says it fixes the warnings thing, that's good enough for me |
| 22:52 |
mohawk |
what say you? |
| 22:52 |
sivoais |
yeah, I made cat:cleanup label for that |
| 22:53 |
mohawk |
good work |
| 22:53 |
mohawk |
win32 build still gronking away |
| 22:53 |
sivoais |
I actually went through all the issues and categorised them |
| 22:53 |
sivoais |
so if, say, I wanted to work on the docs, I just need to click on that label |
| 22:54 |
sivoais |
and I'll know the issues that are relevant |
| 22:54 |
mohawk |
nice work, dawg |
| 22:54 |
mohawk |
i'm afraid the sf-critical and sf-pri things are not so useful |
| 22:55 |
mohawk |
since "critical, priority 1" seems like a mistake has been made; a point has been missed |
| 22:55 |
sivoais |
I just wanted to keep the metadata around |
| 22:55 |
mohawk |
uh, right |
| 22:55 |
* mohawk |
looks awkwardly around |
| 22:56 |
sivoais |
i prefixed them with sf... |
| 22:57 |
sivoais |
I don't agree with the label critical unless it is breaking people's already working code |
| 22:57 |
mohawk |
ha ha, fair enough |
| 22:57 |
mohawk |
you don't need to import every little thing |
| 22:57 |
sivoais |
nah, I'm done unless someone has a specific request :-P |
| 22:58 |
sivoais |
plus, it wasn't hard ;-) |
| 22:58 |
mohawk |
that's what she said |
| 22:58 |
sivoais |
heh |
| 23:01 |
sivoais |
will you look at that... <https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/milestones> |
| 23:02 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 comment on issue #18: Builds and passes on Win 7, 5.20. http://git.io/xgbw |
| 23:02 |
sivoais |
10 open. 2 of which have patches |
| 23:02 |
mohawk |
tcm passes on win32 |
| 23:02 |
mohawk |
merging |
| 23:02 |
sivoais |
awesome |
| 23:03 |
sivoais |
merge it and push to SF&GH! |
| 23:03 |
mohawk |
hold your horses, sparky :-) |
| 23:03 |
sivoais |
well, I actually have to go drive home now... in my *horseless* carriage |
| 23:04 |
mohawk |
ha ha |
| 23:04 |
mohawk |
travel safely, chat soon |
| 23:04 |
mohawk |
merged, rebasing other branches |
| 23:05 |
sivoais |
\o/ |
| 23:05 |
mohawk |
inorite |
| 23:05 |
mohawk |
why isn't the gh bot saying anything? |
| 23:05 |
sivoais |
about what? |
| 23:05 |
mohawk |
about pushing to master |
| 23:06 |
sivoais |
not sure actually |
| 23:06 |
mohawk |
if there's a way to check, please check |
| 23:06 |
mohawk |
ima rebase/forcepush |
| 23:07 |
sivoais |
there is: <https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/issues/19> documents it |
| 23:08 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 deleted travis-ci-more at aea6254: http://git.io/xgxe |
| 23:08 |
sivoais |
events: [ qw(push pull_request commit_comment pull_request_review_comment issues issue_comment) ] |
| 23:08 |
sivoais |
maybe I need a merge event? |
| 23:09 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 force-pushed hainest-assgn_badflag from 2193f11 to e5b7a5d: http://git.io/xgxg |
| 23:09 |
opkick |
pdl/hainest-assgn_badflag e5b7a5d Tim Haines: Add propagation of badflag with .= (Ops::assgn) for sf.net bug 3543056. |
| 23:12 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 pushed 16 new commits to config-devel-checklib: http://git.io/xgpG |
| 23:12 |
opkick |
pdl/config-devel-checklib 117544f Ed J: Add test that dumps installed version of required modules |
| 23:12 |
opkick |
pdl/config-devel-checklib a4ae623 Ed J: Make prereq-dumper include module filesize and location |
| 23:12 |
opkick |
pdl/config-devel-checklib 98c23ec Ed J: ExtUtils::ParseXS req 3.01, 2.21 known broken on generate_core_flags() |
| 23:12 |
sivoais |
interesting, it worked that time |
| 23:13 |
sivoais |
ok, leaving now :-P |
| 23:15 |
mohawk |
laterz |
| 23:18 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 force-pushed config-devel-checklib from 8cc6a55 to 3d5ebf0: http://git.io/xgjP |
| 23:18 |
opkick |
pdl/config-devel-checklib 3d5ebf0 Zakariyya Mughal: remove Devel::CheckLib from inc/... |
| 23:23 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 force-pushed lldfp1 from 2f02768 to fbbfbe8: http://git.io/x2va |
| 23:23 |
opkick |
pdl/lldfp1 569a6aa Craig DeForest: remove references to progenitors and mutators. Update core version number. |
| 23:23 |
opkick |
pdl/lldfp1 1258c92 Craig DeForest: some typos ("propogate"->"propagate" throughout; some typos in CallExt documentation) |
| 23:23 |
opkick |
pdl/lldfp1 2149610 Craig DeForest: more cleanup of pdl.h.PL. Also, cut out foomethod() nonsense since it is not... |
| 23:32 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 force-pushed alienhdf4 from 03a3bc3 to 6cbdba7: http://git.io/x2TT |
| 23:32 |
opkick |
pdl/alienhdf4 6cbdba7 Ed J: Use Alien::HDF4 in PDL::IO::HDF build |
| 23:33 |
mohawk |
all branches rebased and force-pushed |
| 23:49 |
|
travis-ci joined #pdl |
| 23:49 |
travis-ci |
PDLPorters/pdl#35 (master - aea6254 : Zakariyya Mughal): The build passed. |
| 23:49 |
travis-ci |
Change view : https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl/compare/255adcf3cb83...aea62544f94c |
| 23:49 |
travis-ci |
Build details : http://travis-ci.org/PDLPorters/pdl/builds/52820984 |
| 23:49 |
|
travis-ci left #pdl |
| 23:51 |
opkick |
[pdl] mohawk2 closed issue #4: Problem with building on 32-bit without bad values support. http://git.io/x2Yi |
