Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #perl6-dev, 2016-07-13

| Channels | #perl6-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:02 [Coke] I love npm's module installer display
00:09 Zoffix I see. TODOing inside subtests basically is LTA. I couldn't even TODO inside a subtest in Perl 5.
00:10 Zoffix I forget what I said a few days ago about fudging a subtest, but I may have been wrong. A subtest counts as 1 test, so fudging it should be fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:10 * Zoffix will attempt to make subtest fudgable soon
00:11 dalek roast: 346fa6c | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S19-command-line/repl.t:
00:11 dalek roast: [TODO FUDGE] REPL with -M with non-existant module exits fine
00:11 dalek roast:
00:11 dalek roast: RT#128595
00:11 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/346fa6c7cb
00:11 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128595
00:13 dalek roast: eb77164 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S19-command-line/repl.t:
00:13 dalek roast: Fix typo in test name
00:13 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/eb77164100
00:45 sortiz joined #perl6-dev
01:16 * Zoffix will attempt to make subtest fudgable soon
01:16 Zoffix oops
01:22 dalek roast: a8afed7 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S29-os/system.t:
01:22 dalek roast: [TODO FUDGE] run(:merge) on non-existent program does not crash
01:22 dalek roast:
01:22 dalek roast: RT#128594
01:22 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/a8afed7259
01:22 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128594
02:13 vendethiel- joined #perl6-dev
02:30 Zoffix Perl 6 cake: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnMN6Q9WgAAxYSI.jpg:large
03:08 timotimo cakemilia
03:13 benchable joined #perl6-dev
03:17 benchable joined #perl6-dev
03:20 benchable joined #perl6-dev
03:22 MasterDuke benchable: f583f22,110704d my $a = "a" x 2**16;for ^1000 {my $b = $a.chop($_)}
03:22 benchable f583f22=0.371098041534424 110704d=0.369231939315796
03:26 Zoffix benchable: 2015.06,2016.06 my $a = "a" x 2**16;for ^1000 {my $b = $a.chop($_)}
03:27 MasterDuke Zoffix: that was actually an error on my part, it wasn't supposed to show up here just yet
03:27 MasterDuke and we'll need AlexDaniel to run it
03:27 MasterDuke but that should be soon
03:27 AlexDaniel pretty soon, yeah
03:28 AlexDaniel also note that I only went till 2015.10, so 2015.06 is not going to work (yet) :)
03:34 dalek joined #perl6-dev
04:11 timotimo whoa, benchable
06:17 [Tux] This is Rakudo version 2016.06-239-g303e77f built on MoarVM version 2016.06-9-g8fc21d5
06:17 [Tux] test            15.700
06:17 [Tux] test-t           8.933
06:17 [Tux] csv-parser      16.675
06:55 masak nice, less than 9 now
06:55 yoleaux2 10 Jul 2016 13:49Z <Zoffix> masak: should this be closed based on liz's comments or should there be more discussion? https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127789#ticket-history
06:56 masak Zoffix: last I heard, TimToady++ was mulling over that one. dunno if something came out of that, though.
06:57 masak Zoffix: my use case for this is still alive and well: https://github.com/masak/nex/blob/62aaf422ba1c6643b4ea6df547bbb0d23788b339/lib/Games/Nex/Test.pm#L7-L10
07:00 masak I don't know what the criterion is for keeping RT tickets open. my gut feeling tells me we can do better than the current status quo. but I also think lizmat++ makes a set of valid points.
07:12 timotimo what's "antipairs" again?
07:12 timotimo m: enum Foo <A B C D E>; say Foo::.antipairs.perl
07:12 camelia rakudo-moar 303e77: OUTPUT«(Foo::B => "B", Foo::A => "A", Foo::E => "E", Foo::D => "D", Foo::C => "C").Seq␤»
07:12 timotimo you want something different still, right?
07:45 RabidGravy joined #perl6-dev
08:12 brrt joined #perl6-dev
08:18 sno joined #perl6-dev
09:40 travis-ci joined #perl6-dev
09:40 travis-ci Rakudo build errored. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Oops, forgot to add a type smiley'
09:40 travis-ci https://travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/144281580 https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/75971f36cf78...371b934b2d61
09:40 travis-ci left #perl6-dev
10:16 Woodi joined #perl6-dev
10:19 travis-ci joined #perl6-dev
10:19 travis-ci Rakudo build errored. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Array.BIND-POS 3.5x faster for non-reified elements
10:19 travis-ci https://travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/144271600 https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/0941d0fb9cad...2d95de34e027
10:19 travis-ci left #perl6-dev
10:20 travis-ci joined #perl6-dev
10:20 travis-ci Rakudo build errored. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Mention Array.AT-POS/ASSIGN-POS/BIND-POS improvements'
10:20 travis-ci https://travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/144273212 https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/2d95de34e027...75971f36cf78
10:20 travis-ci left #perl6-dev
10:46 lizmat good *, #perl6-dev
10:46 lizmat .tell Zoffix the tests you added to S29-os/system.t yesterday hang on OSX  :-(
10:46 yoleaux2 lizmat: I'll pass your message to Zoffix.
10:48 lizmat which is what is causing the Travis fail messages
10:52 dalek roast: 4f52c6e | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S29-os/system.t:
10:52 dalek roast: Comment out hanging TODO fudge
10:52 dalek roast:
10:52 dalek roast: The test hangs on OSX (per http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2016-07-13#i_12832824 )
10:52 dalek roast:
10:52 dalek roast: RT#128594
10:52 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128594
10:52 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/4f52c6ee10
10:53 Zoffix ACK
10:53 yoleaux2 10:46Z <lizmat> Zoffix: the tests you added to S29-os/system.t yesterday hang on OSX  :-(
10:54 lizmat Zoffix++  # writing and commenting out for now  :-)
10:54 lizmat m: use nqp; say nqp::sha1("abc") eq nqp::sha1("abc\0d")   # disturbing
10:54 camelia rakudo-moar 303e77: OUTPUT«True␤»
10:59 jnthn lizmat: Wasn't a patch for that committed today? :)
10:59 lizmat yeah, but only in MoarVM afaik
10:59 jnthn Yeah
10:59 jnthn We only used it for hashing source code though, iirc
10:59 jnthn Which is relatively unlikely to contain a null :)
10:59 lizmat jnthn: it's also used in Blob.WHICH
11:00 jnthn Oh?
11:00 jnthn That sounds...fragile
11:00 jnthn And also unperformant :)
11:00 lizmat self.^name ~ '|' ~ nqp::sha1(self.join(","))
11:00 jnthn Or at least, relative to the quality of hashing we need on Blob.WHICH :)
11:01 jnthn wow, yeah, that's gonna...work but be slow :)
11:01 * llfourn hopes nobody was using p6 to do pw management and allowing 0 in their passwords.
11:02 jnthn It's still relatively unlikely they'd have gone through a code path that hit the nqp::sha1 op :)
11:02 jnthn And the problem was restricted to that.
11:03 cog__ joined #perl6-dev
11:03 cog_ joined #perl6-dev
11:03 llfourn do we have SHA1 as a builtin?
11:03 llfourn (to Perl 6)
11:03 lizmat llfourn: only at NQP level, afaik
11:04 llfourn ok no worries then :)
11:08 jnthn Yeah, nqp::sha1 should not be used/exposed for general-purpose use
11:08 jnthn It only exists to hash source code files
11:15 brrt maybe call it nqp::hashcodefile then
11:15 brrt just to obscure what it is, and to discourage people from relying on it
11:16 jnthn It may make it less tempting, yeah :)
11:16 jnthn And break anyone who did use it ;)
11:16 jnthn So we'll know about it :)
11:16 jnthn ooh, lunch time :) &
11:20 brrt lunch away
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: 6dbacb3 | lizmat++ | src/core/Array.pm:
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: Make Array.DELETE-POS about 7x faster
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom:
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: - also do 6 allocations less per call
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: - use setelems once instead of keeping popping
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: - ready to handle Arrays with $!reified
12:26 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/6dbacb3452
12:30 lizmat hmmm... s/with/without/  :-(
12:33 dalek rakudo/nom: 66a5928 | lizmat++ | src/core/array_slice.pm:
12:33 dalek rakudo/nom: Speedup %other check that I missed before
12:33 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/66a5928ae1
12:33 lizmat afk&
12:34 [Coke] regarding "when do we close tickets" - RT #127789 is one of those tickets that needs to be decided by @larry; but I would say both masak and lizmat qualify there, and they disagree, so we need someone else to offer an opinion, I think.
12:34 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=127789
12:36 [Coke] BrokenRobot: https://github.com/coke/perl6-profiler-html now lets you round trip the old template (so I can start putting in a new template and running it with live data from a fresh profile run.) also added a gruntfile (not tied to the makefile yet) that lets me start manipulating the html/css/js
12:53 dalek joined #perl6-dev
13:02 brrt lizmat: have you ever tested what the aggegrate effects of the 'Make $x about $n x faster' commits is?
13:02 brrt also, why is nqp::if faster than just if?
13:04 BrokenRobot just if creates a block?
13:04 brrt hmmm
13:04 gfldex m: say do if ( 1 == 1) {};
13:04 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«Nil␤»
13:05 gfldex m: say do if ( 1 == 1) { 1 };
13:05 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«1␤»
13:20 psch m: for ^10000 { $++ if 1 }; say now - BEGIN now;
13:20 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«0.0304687␤»
13:20 psch m: for ^10000 { if 1 { $++ } }; say now - BEGIN now;
13:20 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«0.0354006␤»
13:20 psch aalll noise vOv
13:25 skids joined #perl6-dev
14:35 AlexDaniel joined #perl6-dev
15:07 |Tux| This is Rakudo version 2016.06-241-g66a5928 built on MoarVM version 2016.06-9-g8fc21d5
15:07 |Tux| test            15.242
15:07 |Tux| test-t           8.643
15:07 |Tux| csv-parser      16.281
15:09 BrokenRobot New blog post "A Date With The Bug Queue or Let Me Help You Help Me Help You": http://perl6.party/post/A-Date-With-The-Bug-Queue-or-Let-Me-Help-You-Help-Me-Help-You
15:10 perlpilot BrokenRobot++
15:11 perlpilot BrokenRobot: you could have just asked [Coke] about Lesson 1.  I think he's gone through more bug reports than anybody.
15:13 brrt joined #perl6-dev
15:41 BrokenRobot Challenge accepted! :)
15:45 RabidGravy joined #perl6-dev
15:53 pmichaud joined #perl6-dev
16:01 masak joined #perl6-dev
16:06 MeowMix left #perl6-dev
16:11 Frameless joined #perl6-dev
16:25 Frameless bisect: " ".Int
16:25 bisectable Frameless: on both starting points the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well
16:25 Frameless bisect: say " ".Int
16:25 bisectable Frameless: on both starting points the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well
16:25 Frameless wtf
16:25 Frameless m: say " ".Int
16:25 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«0␤»
16:26 Frameless :o
16:27 Frameless On 2016.06-10-g7cff429 it crashes for the specific case of 1 space: https://gist.github.com/zoffixznet/41f4fd9d2c8acf4fdb26bc7b19265cf7 and there's a ticket reporting it: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128543
16:28 Frameless bisect: " ".Int == 0 or die
16:28 bisectable Frameless: on both starting points the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well
16:28 Frameless Broken bot
16:28 geekosaur less than ideal for this particular case, although if you know a failing version I think you can point to it?
16:29 timotimo that's right; check the irclog search for examples
16:30 geekosaur bisect: bad=7cff429 say " ".Int
16:30 Frameless I'm not following what you're suggesting... Right now it's searching from HEAD to some time in 2015 and it doesn't see the difference between June commits.
16:30 bisectable geekosaur: (2016-04-09) https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/576f975
16:31 Frameless :/
16:31 Frameless Oh, ok, I see the problem. It was working then got broken then now it's working again
16:32 geekosaur yes. and running through every version to find one in which it fails would be rather expensive
16:33 timotimo yup, that's the difficulty with bisecting
16:33 timotimo now you can invert it and say that commit is "good" and we should find the commit that fixed it in the mean time ... or something like that
16:33 Frameless bisect: bad=7cff429,good=66a592 say " ".Int
16:33 bisectable Frameless: cannot find such “bad” revision
16:33 Frameless bisectable: help
16:33 bisectable Frameless: Like this: bisect: good=2015.12 bad=HEAD exit 1 if (^∞).grep({ last })[5] // 0 == 4 # RT 128181
16:34 Frameless bisect: bad=7cff429 good=HEAD say " ".Int
16:34 bisectable Frameless: “bisect run” failure
16:34 Frameless bisect: good=HEAD bad=7cff429 say " ".Int
16:34 bisectable Frameless: “bisect run” failure
16:35 Frameless It doesn't like good HEAD
16:35 * Frameless snickers
16:42 Frameless bisect: good=7cff429 bad=HEAD my $x; try $x = " ".Int; say $x.defined and die
16:42 bisectable Frameless: exit code is 1 on both starting points, bisecting by using the output
16:42 bisectable Frameless: (2016-07-04) https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/e28305c
16:42 Frameless lool
16:42 Frameless So I did fix it after all :D
16:50 AlexDaniel poor bisectable was called broken :)
16:50 dalek roast: c10df83 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S32-str/numeric.t:
16:50 dalek roast: .Int on string with nothing but spaces gives 0
16:50 dalek roast:
16:50 dalek roast: RT#128543
16:50 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/c10df8395e
16:50 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128543
16:54 AlexDaniel geekosaur: fwiw, it is much less expensive than most people think :)
16:56 AlexDaniel in fact, it is so inexpensive that you'll probably see a bot for that in a few days…
17:01 Frameless https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/2015.12...2016.06
17:01 Frameless m: say 1198 * 10 / 60
17:01 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«199.666667␤»
17:01 Frameless 3 hours for a piece of code that runs for 10 secs
17:02 Frameless Guess you could parallelize if you have a ton of cores.
17:03 AlexDaniel yeah, parallelizing is key
17:03 AlexDaniel m: say 1500/(7)*0.5
17:03 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«107.142857␤»
17:04 AlexDaniel less than two minutes for any quick snippet
17:04 AlexDaniel note that stuff typically runs in about 0.2-0.3 s on that server, so it will be even faster
17:14 Frameless *phew* Karen from TPF replied to my CLA email. My journey for sending legal paperwork is now complete :) "Thanks for sending it.  I'm sorry about the problem with the address."
17:21 tbrowder joined #perl6-dev
17:30 FROGGS joined #perl6-dev
17:33 jnthn Frameless: Just heard from Karen about that. :) Commit invite issued.
17:36 Frameless "You are now a member of Rakudo Perl!" jnthn++ thanks :)
17:36 * Frameless celebrates with the appropriate amount of fun
17:37 lizmat Frameless++   # welcome!
17:37 * lizmat hopes to see many fine commits  :-)
17:37 Frameless :)
17:38 timotimo yay
17:38 jnthn Indeed, welcome on board :)
17:39 Frameless \o/
17:43 [Coke] tried to update https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/contrib-Create-PR to reflect our current recommendations about PRs. Can anyone figure out why the code blocks aren't formatted like code?
17:43 [Coke] also, feel free to edit it.
17:43 [Coke] Also, rakudo currently has 42 PRs that need to be reviewed.
17:45 geekosaur that needs to be 4 spaces *in addition to* the indent for the itemized list
17:45 Frameless Using ``` seems to have done the trick as well
17:45 geekosaur so, I think, 6 or 7 spaces
17:45 [Coke] but the list is over at that point, no?
17:46 geekosaur that's a markdown corner case :/
17:46 Frameless Oh number is now messed up
17:46 [Coke] Frameless++ geekosaur++
17:46 [Coke] Frameless: we can just use 1) instead of 1. then
17:46 * geekosaur has seen both behaviors, does not know which github uses
17:46 [Coke] I'm going to add "pending user" as a label for PRs so we can see which ones are waiting for the user to clean something up.
17:47 geekosaur and it may be doing something else because someone coded strictly to spec and this case falls into a hole
17:49 [Coke] jnthn: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/232 is from 2014 and the last comment is that you're going to look at it locally.
17:52 jnthn [Coke]: In the end, fixed size arrays got done as part of the shaped arrays work (and yes, by me :P)
17:52 jnthn m: my @a[4]; @a[5] = 42
17:52 camelia rakudo-moar 66a592: OUTPUT«Index 5 for dimension 1 out of range (must be 0..3)␤  in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1␤␤»
17:53 jnthn [Coke]: So the PR can be closed
17:53 * jnthn does so
17:57 [Coke] jnthn:++
17:59 [Coke] added "pending user" "has conflcits" and "needs review" labels.
18:00 timotimo "pending user" means we're waiting for the original reporter to react to a comment or so?
18:02 [Coke] yup
18:02 [Coke] whereas needs review should mean a developer has to look at it. More labels are fine, just trying to get some light on these old PRs.
18:03 timotimo cool
18:03 [Coke] also tgging a few with failing travis as pending user, since I assume we're not merging anything that failed.
18:04 timotimo thanks, that seems like really helpful work
18:13 [Coke] might need to distinguish between "needs code review" and "needs spec review"
18:13 timotimo mhm, good idea
18:48 pyrimidine joined #perl6-dev
18:55 woolfy joined #perl6-dev
18:55 woolfy left #perl6-dev
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: 04fbb41 | lizmat++ | src/core/Array.pm:
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: Remove one more use of ensure-allocated
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/04fbb417c2
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: ce4734f | lizmat++ | src/core/Str.pm:
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: Make Str.samemark about 50x faster
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom:
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: - also fixes RT #128615
19:34 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128615
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: - rewritten in nqp
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: - made it match the documentation wrt to fewer pattern chars than string
19:34 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/ce4734fd4f
19:38 timotimo 50x    %)
19:39 Frameless :o
19:39 sno joined #perl6-dev
19:40 dalek rakudo/nom: d59c1b8 | lizmat++ | docs/ChangeLog:
19:40 dalek rakudo/nom: Mention Str.samemark in ChangeLog
19:40 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/d59c1b8500
19:41 timotimo Frameless: did you have a different nickname recently?
19:43 TimToady yes, "MeowMix" :)
19:44 lizmat .oO( sounds like "BrokenRobot" )
19:47 Frameless timotimo: naaah :P
19:48 timotimo oh is it zoffix again?
19:51 lizmat no, it's Frameless   :-)
19:52 geekosaur broken robot had a framing error? :p
19:55 dalek rakudo/nom: 8bb4195 | lizmat++ | src/core/Hash.pm:
19:55 dalek rakudo/nom: Handle Hash.Map properly
19:55 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/8bb4195995
19:55 lizmat .oO( nothing that couldn't be Zoffixed )
19:58 gfldex why is it `Hash:U' and not `Hash:U:` ?
19:59 lizmat oops
20:00 lizmat gfldex: good catch
20:00 lizmat now why didn't the spectest catch that  :-(
20:08 dalek rakudo/nom: f5f545c | lizmat++ | src/core/Hash.pm:
20:08 dalek rakudo/nom: Properly indicate invocant type, gfldex++
20:08 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f5f545c60b
20:27 jnthn Time to add another spectest... :)
20:32 sortiz joined #perl6-dev
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: e990823 | lizmat++ | src/core/Array.pm:
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: Make Array.List 5x as fast
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom:
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: - also introduce the :view named, if you are sure the Array won't change
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: - rewritten in nqp, does cow if no :view given
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: - remove last use of ensure-allocated
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/e990823829
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: 24cc914 | lizmat++ | docs/ChangeLog:
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: Mention Array.List improvement
20:47 dalek rakudo/nom: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/24cc914052
20:50 hoelzro joined #perl6-dev
20:59 travis-ci joined #perl6-dev
20:59 travis-ci Rakudo build passed. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Make Array.DELETE-POS about 7x faster
20:59 travis-ci https://travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/144442152 https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/303e77f61053...6dbacb34525d
20:59 travis-ci left #perl6-dev
21:01 lizmat wow, that's a commit of 8+ hours ago
21:01 lizmat anyways, good night, #perl6-dev!
21:03 sortiz g'night lizmat!
21:23 retupmoca joined #perl6-dev
21:36 dalek roast: 01728bd | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S32-hash/map.t:
21:36 dalek roast: .Map on Hash produces correct results
21:36 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/01728bd23b
21:43 Zoffix .tell [Coke] unsure if you have access to look into it, but it seems there's some email issues between RT and perl6-compiler list. For example lizmat replied on the mailing list to a bug report (to perl6-bugs-followup@perl.org), but it did not show up on the ticket: RT#128615 Also, I've been commenting on a bunch of tickets with Bcc to perl6-compiler, but those don't get to mailing list
21:43 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128615
21:43 yoleaux2 Zoffix: I'll pass your message to [Coke].
22:12 skids joined #perl6-dev
22:50 AlexDaniel joined #perl6-dev
23:05 dalek roast: 933588c | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S32-str/samemark.t:
23:05 dalek roast: .samemark with empty-string argument must throw
23:05 dalek roast:
23:05 dalek roast: RT#128615
23:05 dalek roast: review: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/933588c4dd
23:05 synopsebot6 Link:  https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=128615
23:07 travis-ci joined #perl6-dev
23:07 travis-ci Rakudo build passed. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Speedup %other check that I missed before'
23:07 travis-ci https://travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/144443432 https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/6dbacb34525d...66a5928ae101
23:07 travis-ci left #perl6-dev

| Channels | #perl6-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary