Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:51 |
|
gildub joined #puppet-openstack |
01:01 |
|
fvollero_ joined #puppet-openstack |
01:12 |
|
fvollero joined #puppet-openstack |
01:36 |
|
markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack |
02:22 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
02:41 |
|
britthou_ joined #puppet-openstack |
03:03 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
03:05 |
|
fedexo joined #puppet-openstack |
03:14 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
03:37 |
|
gfidente joined #puppet-openstack |
03:46 |
openstackgerrit |
Merged stackforge/puppet-openstack_extras: repo: bump to Kilo by default https://review.openstack.org/181575 |
04:10 |
|
vinsh joined #puppet-openstack |
04:22 |
|
gfidente^2nd joined #puppet-openstack |
04:37 |
|
markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack |
04:42 |
|
stevemar joined #puppet-openstack |
05:09 |
|
hostranger1 left #puppet-openstack |
05:13 |
openstackgerrit |
Gilles Dubreuil proposed stackforge/puppet-openstack-specs: Consolidate authentication in OpenStack Puppet resource providers https://review.openstack.org/181600 |
05:13 |
|
paramite joined #puppet-openstack |
05:15 |
|
_para joined #puppet-openstack |
05:17 |
openstackgerrit |
Gilles Dubreuil proposed stackforge/puppet-openstack-specs: Consolidate authentication in OpenStack Puppet resource providers https://review.openstack.org/181600 |
05:32 |
|
saneax joined #puppet-openstack |
06:14 |
|
hostranger joined #puppet-openstack |
06:14 |
|
hostranger left #puppet-openstack |
06:36 |
|
mmagr joined #puppet-openstack |
07:00 |
|
tfz joined #puppet-openstack |
07:04 |
|
arnaud_orange joined #puppet-openstack |
07:14 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
07:22 |
|
vinsh joined #puppet-openstack |
07:23 |
|
alex_bh joined #puppet-openstack |
07:24 |
|
bogdando joined #puppet-openstack |
07:27 |
|
mmagr joined #puppet-openstack |
07:27 |
|
jpena joined #puppet-openstack |
07:38 |
|
imcsk8 joined #puppet-openstack |
07:44 |
|
gfidente joined #puppet-openstack |
07:46 |
|
dgurtner joined #puppet-openstack |
07:51 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
07:58 |
|
jistr joined #puppet-openstack |
08:22 |
|
derekh joined #puppet-openstack |
08:29 |
|
stamak joined #puppet-openstack |
08:54 |
|
gildub joined #puppet-openstack |
09:06 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
09:07 |
openstackgerrit |
Gael Chamoulaud proposed stackforge/puppet-neutron: Fix neutron_network for --router:external setting https://review.openstack.org/159548 |
09:23 |
openstackgerrit |
Merged stackforge/puppet-neutron: Fix neutron_network for --router:external setting https://review.openstack.org/159548 |
09:28 |
|
derekh joined #puppet-openstack |
09:31 |
|
cdent joined #puppet-openstack |
09:55 |
openstackgerrit |
Javier Peña proposed stackforge/puppet-trove: Document requirement to use separate RabbitMQ https://review.openstack.org/181848 |
09:56 |
openstackgerrit |
Javier Peña proposed stackforge/puppet-trove: Document requirement to use separate RabbitMQ https://review.openstack.org/181848 |
10:54 |
social |
sbadia: spredzy: could I get this one in? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169808/ |
10:55 |
|
gfidente joined #puppet-openstack |
10:58 |
|
rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack |
11:00 |
|
rcallawa_ joined #puppet-openstack |
11:00 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
11:08 |
|
dalgaaf joined #puppet-openstack |
11:14 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
11:28 |
EmilienM |
good morning! |
11:55 |
|
saneax joined #puppet-openstack |
12:02 |
|
dprince joined #puppet-openstack |
12:13 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
12:27 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
12:41 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
12:43 |
openstackgerrit |
Gilles Dubreuil proposed stackforge/puppet-openstacklib: Predefined source of authentication information https://review.openstack.org/180407 |
12:44 |
openstackgerrit |
Gilles Dubreuil proposed stackforge/puppet-openstacklib: Predefined source of authentication information https://review.openstack.org/180407 |
12:45 |
openstackgerrit |
Giulio Fidente proposed stackforge/puppet-tripleo: Add support for haproxy_service_manage https://review.openstack.org/180484 |
12:52 |
|
rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack |
12:54 |
EmilienM |
jpena|lunch: I posted on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181848, without -1 but still a question |
12:57 |
openstackgerrit |
Giulio Fidente proposed stackforge/puppet-glance: Decouple sync_db from manage_service and enabled https://review.openstack.org/180229 |
13:02 |
openstackgerrit |
Merged stackforge/puppet-horizon: Beaker tests https://review.openstack.org/177253 |
13:14 |
jpena |
EmilienM: thx, I just replied. Would you prefer to have the note in a different section? |
13:14 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
13:14 |
EmilienM |
jpena: I don't know but it does sound like a limitation |
13:15 |
EmilienM |
jpena, gchamoul, mmagr: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181439/5/spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb |
13:15 |
EmilienM |
see how I try to use testing ^ - wdyt? |
13:17 |
jpena |
EmilienM: looks ok to me |
13:17 |
EmilienM |
jpena: maybe in "Security" section? |
13:18 |
EmilienM |
(you can create it) |
13:18 |
jpena |
EmilienM: ok, I'll do that |
13:20 |
|
arnaud_orange joined #puppet-openstack |
13:21 |
|
ibravo joined #puppet-openstack |
13:21 |
openstackgerrit |
Javier Peña proposed stackforge/puppet-trove: Document requirement to use separate RabbitMQ https://review.openstack.org/181848 |
13:27 |
EmilienM |
jpena: it seems almost working: https://review.openstack.org/181848 |
13:27 |
EmilienM |
wrong link, https://jenkins04.openstack.org/job/gate-puppet-keystone-puppet-beaker-rspec-dsvm-centos7/6/console |
13:27 |
|
morazi joined #puppet-openstack |
13:28 |
* jpena |
reads |
13:28 |
EmilienM |
jpena: some packages have 'is not signed' thing |
13:29 |
jpena |
EmilienM: oook, so we need to disable gpgcheck in the repo for now. This won't be needed once we are GA |
13:30 |
EmilienM |
ok |
13:30 |
EmilienM |
cool! |
13:35 |
EmilienM |
jpena: this is weird though, do you know why can't I use the GPG key? |
13:36 |
jpena |
EmilienM: the issue is that, since these are not production packages, they are unsigned. If the repo is created with "gpgcheck=1", all packages will be checked against the gpg key specified. If they fail, they will be rejected |
13:36 |
EmilienM |
jpena: gpgcheck=1 is hardcoded in puppet |
13:36 |
EmilienM |
I'll have to make a patch |
13:36 |
jpena |
ouch |
13:44 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
13:46 |
|
richm joined #puppet-openstack |
13:46 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
13:48 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
13:54 |
|
vinay_ joined #puppet-openstack |
13:54 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: I merged that one for you |
13:54 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: did you see my brief topic in the etherpad? |
13:55 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: no, which one? |
13:55 |
mfisch |
about puppet-group |
13:56 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: I'm sorry, which one ? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-summit-design-puppet ? |
13:56 |
mfisch |
gah for the meeting tomorrow ;) |
13:57 |
EmilienM |
ahhhh |
13:57 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: too many etherpads :) |
13:57 |
mfisch |
yes for sure |
13:57 |
EmilienM |
w00t centos jobs is green |
13:57 |
EmilienM |
jpena: ^ |
13:57 |
EmilienM |
jpena: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181439/6/spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb |
14:00 |
jpena |
EmilienM: cool! |
14:00 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: I dropped some comments |
14:00 |
mfisch |
thanks whats the etherpad link again? |
14:00 |
mfisch |
I've managed to lose it |
14:01 |
|
stevemar joined #puppet-openstack |
14:01 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150512 |
14:02 |
mfisch |
I suspect the answer is just to drop it and announce to people who might still be using it |
14:03 |
|
dfisher joined #puppet-openstack |
14:03 |
mfisch |
the "official" one is better |
14:03 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: we should make a required attendee list on those topics for the summit too |
14:03 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: for example I have a talk at 2 I think and a session to moderate at 3 |
14:03 |
mfisch |
for the work-day |
14:04 |
EmilienM |
spredzy, sbadia: how do you want to consume msync? |
14:05 |
EmilienM |
spredzy, sbadia : some people (me, crinkle and mmagr) are waiting to know if we can push common files in repo or if we should wait for you to have msync job in Openstack infra ? |
14:06 |
sbadia |
hi! |
14:06 |
sbadia |
hum personaly I think we can push whitout a central job no? |
14:06 |
EmilienM |
sbadia: I would rather see an automatic workflow |
14:07 |
sbadia |
msync generate git patchset so, it's a bit weired no (to have a job on -infra) |
14:07 |
EmilienM |
if you push in msync repo and if the code is merged, it will create reviews for each repo |
14:07 |
|
openstackgerrit joined #puppet-openstack |
14:07 |
sbadia |
ok, a job to generate patchset for review :-) MOAR Reviews |
14:07 |
EmilienM |
yes |
14:08 |
EmilienM |
I would see something like this |
14:08 |
EmilienM |
because otherwise nobody will use it except you |
14:08 |
EmilienM |
with that automation, we will enforce to use the msync repo for common bits (Gemfile, etc) during review process |
14:09 |
EmilienM |
and when the patch is merged, it creates the patchsets in Gerrit |
14:09 |
* sbadia |
think to a workflow |
14:09 |
EmilienM |
sbadia: maybe you can add that in the topic for tomorrow's meeting. |
14:09 |
EmilienM |
sbadia: and come up with a proposal with spredzy |
14:09 |
sbadia |
it's an idea yep |
14:09 |
spredzy |
EmilienM, sbadia good idea |
14:09 |
EmilienM |
sbadia: thanks! |
14:09 |
spredzy |
sbadia, it could be a post-merge hook |
14:10 |
EmilienM |
mmagr: in the meanwhile, we push files manually (ie gemfile) |
14:10 |
spredzy |
will need to be merged in openstack-infra first thought (sbadia) |
14:10 |
sbadia |
spredzy: per/repo ? :-o |
14:11 |
spredzy |
No, you merge something into the msync project, when it is merged, the post hook will actaully run msync update |
14:11 |
spredzy |
which will submit a new review on all the 'managed' puppet-openstack project |
14:11 |
spredzy |
sbadia, ^ |
14:11 |
spredzy |
so the hook is only for the msync project |
14:12 |
spredzy |
make any sense ? |
14:12 |
sbadia |
ah, yes, I thought to something like this |
14:12 |
mmagr |
EmilienM, ok, should I restore my minitest patches or we will have that line as part of bigger patches? |
14:13 |
EmilienM |
mmagr: we should add minitest in the context of having beaker on centos, like I'm doing in puppet-keystone |
14:16 |
* social |
headbangs from auth_uri auth_url keystone_auth_uri keystone_auth_url |
14:16 |
|
ferest joined #puppet-openstack |
14:20 |
|
chem joined #puppet-openstack |
14:35 |
richm |
social: don't forget identity_uri |
14:36 |
social |
richm: yeah :) |
14:37 |
social |
richm: oh I wanted to ask on what patches need testing for keytstone v3, but I think I got them collected now |
14:37 |
|
prad joined #puppet-openstack |
14:39 |
EmilienM |
richm: fyi, centos beaker jobs are about to be merged, that means we can test keystone v3 on RH systems too |
14:39 |
EmilienM |
richm: https://review.openstack.org/181439 - I think I have the right version of OSclient |
14:40 |
dmsimard |
Would love to merge backports to stable/icehouse and stable/juno, could I get some core reviewing love on these please ? <3 thanks |
14:40 |
dmsimard |
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I70da06159c0d3c6fa204b5f7a468909ffab4d633,n,z |
14:40 |
dmsimard |
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I513599735e974c07a6a0e46fd319930740f259cc,n,z |
14:52 |
|
mdorman joined #puppet-openstack |
14:53 |
|
vinsh joined #puppet-openstack |
15:03 |
|
markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack |
15:05 |
|
jpena joined #puppet-openstack |
15:07 |
mdorman |
etherpad.openstack.org down for everybody, or just for me? |
15:08 |
EmilienM |
mdorman: just for you ;) |
15:11 |
mdorman |
fun, ok. |
15:14 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
15:14 |
|
blentz joined #puppet-openstack |
15:15 |
richm |
EmilienM: I don't see the string "openstackclient" in https://review.openstack.org/181439 ? |
15:16 |
EmilienM |
richm: http://logs.openstack.org/39/181439/6/check/gate-puppet-keystone-puppet-beaker-rspec-dsvm-centos7/cf91061/console.html#_2015-05-11_13_56_12_446 |
15:24 |
richm |
EmilienM: I can't tell what version of openstackclient it is using |
15:26 |
EmilienM |
richm: oh, indeed |
15:26 |
EmilienM |
richm: when that one is merged, I'll rebase the keystone v3 - beaker patch to use centos. |
15:26 |
EmilienM |
I'm waiting from sbadia and crinkle's feedback |
15:29 |
richm |
ack |
15:48 |
|
rwsu joined #puppet-openstack |
15:52 |
|
aimon joined #puppet-openstack |
16:01 |
hogepodge |
any cisco people in the room? |
16:05 |
|
cwolferh joined #puppet-openstack |
16:15 |
|
vinsh_ joined #puppet-openstack |
16:26 |
|
aimon joined #puppet-openstack |
16:30 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: for minitest, though we need it to make it work |
16:31 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: do you want a separated patchset? |
16:31 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: what is it for? |
16:31 |
EmilienM |
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181439/6/Gemfile |
16:31 |
EmilienM |
to run beaker on centos |
16:31 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: why is that needed? |
16:32 |
EmilienM |
mmagr: do you know? |
16:32 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: if you don't know then why is it there |
16:32 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: because I asked mmagr the blockers he had on centos, and this module was needed |
16:33 |
EmilienM |
let me find why again |
16:33 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: can you just submit the patch without it and see if it breaks? |
16:33 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: I've never had to use that gem |
16:33 |
EmilienM |
yeah, I did it already but I can't find logs |
16:35 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: if it really does need to be there then it should be explained in the commit message and/or a comment |
16:36 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: BTW: https://rubygems.org/gems/beaker/ |
16:37 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: okay, if it's already a dependency then it shouldn't be needed, right? |
16:37 |
crinkle |
or is it that a specific version is needed |
16:37 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: they forgot to add the dep in https://rubygems.org/gems/beaker/versions/1.20.1 |
16:37 |
mmagr |
crinkle, it breaks, you won't be able to run bundle exec rspec spec/acceptance without minitest throwing exception |
16:38 |
mmagr |
will find the reason |
16:38 |
crinkle |
oh because our beaker is so old |
16:38 |
crinkle |
why does it break on centos but not ubuntu? |
16:38 |
mmagr |
it's somewhere in my google search history |
16:38 |
mmagr |
crinkle, now to that question I have no answer unfortunately |
16:42 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: for repo config, let me use openstack_extras |
16:42 |
EmilienM |
maybe you want to use the same method for ubuntu too |
16:42 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: yes it should at least be the same |
16:43 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: about minitest can you just add a note in the commit message about it and link to the bug if mmagr can find it? |
16:43 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: sure thing |
16:44 |
|
derekh_ joined #puppet-openstack |
16:48 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
16:48 |
EmilienM |
let's try |
16:49 |
mmagr |
crinkle, so IIUC minitest was part of ruby 1.8 itself, but is not for ruby 1.9 and some gems are using minitest and so it causes the error now if you don't have minitest explicitly installed ... one reason that it's functional on ubuntu might be that the gem is installed by default, but on centos it is not |
16:50 |
mmagr |
sources - rails: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/9256 , foreman: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/2650 |
16:50 |
mmagr |
EmilienM, ^ |
16:50 |
EmilienM |
mmagr: ack thx |
16:50 |
mmagr |
np |
16:50 |
crinkle |
ah that sort of makes sense |
16:50 |
crinkle |
thanks mmagr |
16:50 |
mmagr |
np |
16:51 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
16:51 |
EmilienM |
mmagr: thanks |
16:51 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: before I go lunch, I wanted to highlight https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181600/ - maybe you can have a look this week |
16:53 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: sure |
16:55 |
|
aimon joined #puppet-openstack |
16:55 |
|
aimon_ joined #puppet-openstack |
16:58 |
|
aimon__ joined #puppet-openstack |
16:58 |
|
xarses joined #puppet-openstack |
17:14 |
|
prad_ joined #puppet-openstack |
17:26 |
|
britthouser joined #puppet-openstack |
17:27 |
|
britthou_ joined #puppet-openstack |
17:54 |
|
cdent joined #puppet-openstack |
18:00 |
|
rcallawa_ joined #puppet-openstack |
18:08 |
|
vinsh joined #puppet-openstack |
18:13 |
|
tfz joined #puppet-openstack |
18:25 |
|
joshsamuelson joined #puppet-openstack |
18:26 |
|
larsks|alt joined #puppet-openstack |
18:26 |
|
mwoodson joined #puppet-openstack |
18:26 |
|
mwoodson joined #puppet-openstack |
18:26 |
|
tfz1 joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
slagle joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
beddari joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
maximov joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
ianw joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
wabu joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
dmellado joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
tlbr joined #puppet-openstack |
18:27 |
|
slagle joined #puppet-openstack |
19:06 |
|
britthouser joined #puppet-openstack |
19:10 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: do you know why the tripleo job is failing on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181439/ ? |
19:10 |
crinkle |
maybe this http://logs.openstack.org/39/181439/8/check-tripleo/check-tripleo-ironic-overcloud-f20puppet-nonha/a57516f/console.html#_2015-05-11_16_52_47_053 |
19:13 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
19:15 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Beaker: install APT repo with openstack_extras https://review.openstack.org/182026 |
19:18 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/181439 |
19:19 |
|
stamak joined #puppet-openstack |
19:22 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-ceilometer: Beaker: install APT repo with openstack_extras https://review.openstack.org/182029 |
19:27 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-keystone: do not merge, CI test https://review.openstack.org/182031 |
19:38 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-ceilometer: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/182035 |
19:49 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-ceilometer: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/182035 |
19:49 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-cinder: Beaker: install APT repo with openstack_extras https://review.openstack.org/182046 |
19:49 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-cinder: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/182047 |
19:58 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-designate: Beaker: install APT repo with openstack_extras https://review.openstack.org/182052 |
20:01 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-designate: Bring Redhat support to acceptance tests https://review.openstack.org/182053 |
20:05 |
openstackgerrit |
Emilien Macchi proposed stackforge/puppet-glance: Beaker: install APT repo with openstack_extras https://review.openstack.org/182058 |
20:18 |
EmilienM |
mfisch, crinkle: at the Summit, we are going to discuss which modules we 'officially' support. I would like to bring the idea we should support modules that have rspec tests, acceptance, packaging in upsteam repos and that respect our conventions |
20:18 |
EmilienM |
I think that's a minimum |
20:20 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: that seems a little backwards to me |
20:20 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: modulo what then? |
20:20 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: that makes it sound like therea re a bunch of homeless modules we should consider adopting |
20:21 |
richm |
What is the official way to specify a dependency? The Gemfile? |
20:21 |
crinkle |
where instead there should be just our modules, and we should bring them into compliance with that you described |
20:21 |
crinkle |
richm: metadata.json |
20:21 |
crinkle |
er for module dependencies |
20:21 |
EmilienM |
richm: and .fixtures.yml if you run unit tests |
20:22 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: ok, let me rephrase : how should be a module to be considered as compliant ? |
20:23 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: that's something I would like to define together, so we can scale our 'forge' with compliant & consistent modules |
20:23 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: ah, that makes more sense |
20:23 |
EmilienM |
my english is really bad |
20:23 |
EmilienM |
I vote for speaking french here, we have enough folks |
20:24 |
crinkle |
>.< |
20:24 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: :P |
20:25 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: there is a set of criteria for puppet forge "approved" modules we could steal from |
20:26 |
crinkle |
https://forge.puppetlabs.com/approved |
20:26 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: definitely +2 |
20:26 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: I don't want to be backward. My main concern is to separate compliant modules with the ones we are still dev |
20:27 |
EmilienM |
s/still dev/still dev + testing/ |
20:27 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: what's the goal for that? to figure out which ones should go in openstack/ and which stay in stackforge/ ? |
20:27 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: or just which ones should get released? |
20:28 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: the ones we should get released |
20:28 |
EmilienM |
crinkle: and maybe copied to puppetlabs forge |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
we will always have stable and WIP modules |
20:29 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: released should mean uploaded to forge |
20:29 |
crinkle |
EmilienM: but ++ to defining it |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
I just want to let our community know about that |
20:29 |
crinkle |
sounds good to me |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
exed_: monasca |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
I'm sure the module works |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
mfisch is using it |
20:29 |
EmilienM |
but I've looked at the code and we need to re-work on some parts |
20:30 |
EmilienM |
so I can't say this module is compliant now |
20:30 |
EmilienM |
while puppet-nova is compliant |
20:44 |
|
openstackgerrit_ joined #puppet-openstack |
20:51 |
|
Fin1te joined #puppet-openstack |
20:53 |
openstackgerrit |
Colleen Murphy proposed stackforge/puppet-glance: Fix ubuntu vagrant box nodesets https://review.openstack.org/182080 |
20:53 |
openstackgerrit |
Colleen Murphy proposed stackforge/puppet-glance: Add more details on running tests to the readme https://review.openstack.org/182081 |
20:55 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
21:24 |
openstackgerrit |
Abel Lopez proposed stackforge/puppet-heat: Update heat domain https://review.openstack.org/182092 |
21:25 |
mfisch |
we are using Monasca |
21:25 |
mfisch |
but its missing tests etc |
21:25 |
|
ericpeterson joined #puppet-openstack |
21:27 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: is it packaged somewhere? |
21:27 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: I think so but I think we install from venvs, let me ask |
21:32 |
mfisch |
EmilienM: okay we package it from git-upstream |
21:33 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: nothing in RDO/UCA ? |
21:33 |
mfisch |
nothing to my knowledge |
21:34 |
mfisch |
there's a real push in part from us to get it more integrated as a full project |
21:34 |
mfisch |
its not big tent yet |
21:35 |
|
gildub joined #puppet-openstack |
21:35 |
EmilienM |
mfisch: 'us' == monasca group ? |
21:36 |
mfisch |
us as in TWC users of monasca |
21:51 |
openstackgerrit |
Adam Vinsh proposed stackforge/puppet-swift: Add support for dedicated replication network. https://review.openstack.org/177037 |
22:07 |
|
saneax joined #puppet-openstack |
22:13 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
23:14 |
|
panda|afk joined #puppet-openstack |
23:15 |
|
ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack |
23:16 |
|
britthouser joined #puppet-openstack |
23:17 |
|
xingchao joined #puppet-openstack |
23:50 |
|
aimon joined #puppet-openstack |
23:59 |
|
xarses joined #puppet-openstack |