Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #puppet-openstack, 2015-06-19

| Channels | #puppet-openstack index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:26 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
00:52 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
00:55 openstack joined #puppet-openstack
00:56 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
01:21 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
01:32 openstackgerrit Matt Fischer proposed openstack/puppet-designate: MySQL: change default MySQL collate to utf8_general_ci  https://review.openstack.org/187451
01:47 EmilienM richm: can I work on 178828?
01:47 EmilienM richm: good work with gildub, I see tests are passing
01:47 openstackgerrit Dan Prince proposed openstack/puppet-tripleo: Add tripleo::package_install  https://review.openstack.org/193393
01:57 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
02:05 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: support for keystone v3 api - beaker tests  https://review.openstack.org/178828
02:07 richm EmilienM: yes, please work on 178828
02:07 EmilienM richm: yeah, I'm on it
02:07 EmilienM richm: have you tested upgrade?
02:08 EmilienM richm: like, before and after your blueprint?
02:08 richm EmilienM: no
02:08 EmilienM richm: this is something we might need to explore to make sure we don't break anything. I'll try to make progress on that;
02:09 richm yes
02:09 EmilienM richm: we don't want to break current deployments :-)
02:09 richm no
02:12 EmilienM richm: seems like packaging is broken on centos7
02:12 EmilienM https://jenkins04.openstack.org/job/gate-puppet-ke​ystone-puppet-beaker-rspec-dsvm-centos7/76/console
02:12 EmilienM Error: /Stage[main]/Keystone/Package[keystone]/ensure: change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install openstack-keystone' returned 1: Error downloading packages:
02:12 EmilienM 2015-06-19 02:11:24.079 |   python-dogpile-core-0.4.1-2.el7.noarch: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
02:13 richm EmilienM: Yumrepo[rdo-kilo-testing]
02:13 EmilienM mh
02:13 richm maybe try the official rdo-kilo instead of testing?
02:14 EmilienM I'm using https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/​openstack/openstack-kilo/testing/el7/
02:14 EmilienM which is was I was told to use
02:14 EmilienM maybe I'm outdated now.
02:14 EmilienM let's try https://repos.fedorapeople.org/re​pos/openstack/openstack-kilo/el7/
02:15 richm I've been using https://repos.fedorapeople.org/re​pos/openstack/openstack-kilo/el7 for all of my testing
02:15 EmilienM richm: cool cool
02:18 EmilienM richm: when you tested keystone::roles::admin, did you create the keystone_service manually?
02:19 richm I use packstack
02:19 EmilienM cool
02:19 richm I use keystone with httpd mod_wsgi
02:24 EmilienM richm: I'm having this http://paste.openstack.org/show/303340/
02:24 EmilienM richm: the manifest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178828​/42/spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb,cm
02:25 EmilienM I think I found a bug
02:26 EmilienM it runs "/usr/bin/openstack role list --quiet --format csv --project absent --user absent"
02:26 EmilienM richm: ^
02:26 richm yeah, that's not good
02:28 EmilienM richm: in puppet/provider/keystone_user_role/openstack.rb I think
02:28 EmilienM ::keystone::roles::admin is broken somehow
02:30 EmilienM richm: L46 of puppet/provider/keystone_user_role/openstack.rb maybe
02:31 richm How can I reproduce this problem on my local workstation?
02:31 chem joined #puppet-openstack
02:33 EmilienM richm: look at my manifest
02:34 EmilienM chem: I'm testing v3 thing now, like you started to do too. I'm having troubles with keystone_user_role
02:34 EmilienM richm: I'm also digging openstacklib
02:35 chem EmilienM: I'll look into it tomorrow ...
02:35 EmilienM chem: cool cool
02:35 EmilienM chem: my patch to test https://review.openstack.org/178828
02:35 richm bundle exec rake spec SPEC_OPTS="--format d" SPEC=spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb
02:35 richm ?
02:35 chem EmilienM: ack
02:35 EmilienM richm: no, I'm running beaker
02:36 chem no
02:36 EmilienM richm: but if you have a VM you can compile the catalog
02:36 chem richm: BEAKER_debug=yes BEAKER_set=openstack-ubuntu BEAKER_destroy=no bundle exec rake beaker
02:36 chem change the BEAKER_set to the one you're testing
02:36 EmilienM neat
02:37 richm not familiar with beaker
02:37 EmilienM it's like 'absent' is given as a property to openstack.rb
02:37 richm @user_id ||= Puppet::Resource.indirection.find(​"Keystone_user/#{get_user}")[:id]
02:37 EmilienM richm: don't worry. If you have a VM you can just try to install keystone with the branch
02:37 richm this seems to be returning 'absent' as the @user_id
02:38 chem richm: you get the list that fit BEAKER_set with bundle exec rake beaker_nodes
02:38 chem hope it help
02:38 crinkle just run puppet apply on the manifest in the pp variable in the spec
02:39 EmilienM crinkle: o/
02:39 crinkle hi EmilienM
02:39 EmilienM crinkle: I updated beaker tests for v3 and having troubles with keystone_user_role provider
02:40 crinkle EmilienM: i have no information but for richm to help you the easiest thing is to copy the manifest out of the spec and run puppet apply on it
02:40 EmilienM the manifest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178828​/42/spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb,cm
02:40 EmilienM richm: ^
02:45 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
02:59 openstackgerrit Giulio Fidente proposed openstack/puppet-nova: Add parameter to control use of rbd for the ephemeral storage  https://review.openstack.org/119093
03:01 stevemar joined #puppet-openstack
03:02 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
03:26 stevemar joined #puppet-openstack
03:46 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
04:12 fedexo joined #puppet-openstack
04:24 saneax joined #puppet-openstack
04:42 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
04:47 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
05:22 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
05:22 aimon joined #puppet-openstack
05:41 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
06:17 openstackgerrit Sebastien Badia proposed openstack/puppet-designate: Fix beaker on Trusty and  update .gitreview file  https://review.openstack.org/191287
06:22 magicboiz joined #puppet-openstack
06:27 gfidente joined #puppet-openstack
06:36 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
06:36 barthalion EmilienM: what's left to do to get kilo out the door?
06:53 beddari hmm what is the policy for adding ml2 drivers to puppet-neutron? I saw e.g I think it was midonet got one backported even :)
07:42 paramite joined #puppet-openstack
08:02 magicboiz hi, I'm planning to test Openstack with puppet-openstack-cloud. Is there any QuickStart or any other doc to read and configure the parameters, plan the installation, etc?
08:03 magicboiz I want to try an OpenStack desing based on 3 controller + 3 ceph + 1 compute...
08:16 dgurtner joined #puppet-openstack
08:16 cdent joined #puppet-openstack
08:18 derekh joined #puppet-openstack
08:25 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
08:36 degorenko joined #puppet-openstack
09:03 openstackgerrit Athanasios Douitsis proposed openstack/puppet-vswitch: Support for FreeBSD  https://review.openstack.org/191523
09:03 dgurtner joined #puppet-openstack
09:03 dgurtner joined #puppet-openstack
09:06 aarefiev joined #puppet-openstack
09:31 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
09:32 magicboiz hi, I'm planning to test Openstack with puppet-openstack-cloud. Is there any QuickStart or any other doc to read and configure the parameters, plan the installation, etc?
09:32 magicboiz I want to try an OpenStack desing based on 3 controller + 3 ceph + 1 compute...
09:40 openstackgerrit Yanis Guenane proposed openstack/puppet-nova: network_api_class: Add new parameter  https://review.openstack.org/193469
09:50 social hmm this is new one ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 192.168.122.152_provision_glance
09:50 social Error: Could not prefetch glance_image provider 'glance': File: /etc/glance/glance-api.conf does not contain all required sections.
09:59 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
10:01 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
10:03 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
10:13 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
10:17 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
10:31 social gfidente: you have to scream here to get patches merged
10:33 gfidente social, so at this point at least three people worked on that patch showing some interest
10:33 gfidente but it's lacking reviews indeed
10:33 gfidente (some interested in what the patch aims to do)
10:46 openstackgerrit Timur Nurlygayanov proposed openstack/puppet-heat: Fixed issue with rabbitmq_ha_queues for Heat  https://review.openstack.org/193492
11:01 sc` joined #puppet-openstack
11:11 aarefiev joined #puppet-openstack
11:14 thing1 joined #puppet-openstack
11:14 thing1 left #puppet-openstack
11:29 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
11:59 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
12:05 dprince joined #puppet-openstack
12:05 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
12:09 hostranger joined #puppet-openstack
12:16 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
12:28 magicboiz hi, I'm planning to test Openstack with puppet-openstack-cloud. Is there any QuickStart or any other doc to read and configure the parameters, plan the installation, etc?
12:28 magicboiz I want to try an OpenStack desing based on 3 controller + 3 ceph + 1 compute...
12:33 hostranger left #puppet-openstack
12:47 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
12:47 cdelatte joined #puppet-openstack
12:47 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
12:56 hostranger joined #puppet-openstack
12:56 hostranger left #puppet-openstack
13:00 openstackgerrit Yanis Guenane proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Opencontrail: Create neutron::plugins::opencontrail  https://review.openstack.org/187986
13:09 dfisher joined #puppet-openstack
13:16 richm joined #puppet-openstack
13:22 EmilienM good morning
13:22 EmilienM magicboiz: yes, we did this module in the context of spinalstack.enovance.com
13:27 EmilienM sbadia: thx for your patch on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191287
13:27 EmilienM I think it's a good temp fix to unblock our designate CI
13:27 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
13:31 sbadia hi
13:31 sbadia yep it's a very ugly fix
13:31 sbadia but a patch on inifile is on the way :)
13:31 EmilienM sbadia: awesome
13:34 saju_m joined #puppet-openstack
13:35 ferest joined #puppet-openstack
13:41 richm EmilienM: I'm about to try to reproduce the acceptance test problem.
13:42 richm EmilienM: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/234033/34721346/
13:42 richm EmilienM: note that this uses https://repos.fedorapeople.org/re​pos/openstack/openstack-kilo/el7/ not testing
13:43 richm ah, crud - nevermind
13:43 EmilienM richm: note I'm using the new repo now, so I'm good on this side
13:44 EmilienM richm: your manifest is outdated
13:44 prad joined #puppet-openstack
13:44 EmilienM barthalion: keystone v3 is needed
13:45 EmilienM richm: the manifest is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178828​/42/spec/acceptance/basic_keystone_spec.rb,cm
13:47 derekh dprince: gfidente Current problems with the fedora job are due to a fedora infrastructure problem of some sort, their looking into it
13:47 derekh opp wc, sorry
13:50 dprince derekh: gotcha, thanks. We could pin to a specific mirror?
13:51 richm ok - I see the error - working on it
13:53 EmilienM richm: the same as me?
13:54 richm yes
13:54 morazi joined #puppet-openstack
13:57 degorenko EmilienM, hi!
13:58 richm it's the @#*@ --project again - my bete noire
13:59 degorenko i've updated my change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192721/ There is no still tests, i'm working on it right now. I have one question: sahara has parameter infrastructure_engine which can be set to 'heat'.
14:00 degorenko EmilienM, and how i can set dependency on heat module?
14:00 degorenko require ::heat ?
14:04 EmilienM richm: I like when you speak french
14:05 EmilienM degorenko: hey! thanks for the patch! I'll look at it asap
14:05 EmilienM degorenko: yes
14:07 degorenko Emilie M, thanks! Please leave so many comments as you can! I want to have brilliant and compliant sahara module :-)
14:07 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
14:08 EmilienM degorenko: cool, as long the module respects our standards, have test and pass CI I'm happy for now
14:09 degorenko EmilienM, of course! I'm working on tests. I'll hope that i can finish it today
14:14 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
14:16 imcsk8 joined #puppet-openstack
14:21 richm EmilienM: it is also used frequently in English, and probably has a different meaning than the French origin - http://www.merriam-webster.com​/dictionary/b%C3%AAte%20noire
14:23 EmilienM richm: funny
14:24 stevemar joined #puppet-openstack
14:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/puppet-designate: Fix beaker on Trusty and  update .gitreview file  https://review.openstack.org/191287
14:27 xarses joined #puppet-openstack
14:30 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: Unpin beaker-rspec  https://review.openstack.org/189448
14:34 chem joined #puppet-openstack
14:41 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: MySQL: change default MySQL collate to utf8_general_ci  https://review.openstack.org/187451
14:41 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: Add support for RabbitMQ clustering  https://review.openstack.org/192033
14:41 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: Introduce public_url, internal_url and admin_url  https://review.openstack.org/70393
14:41 EmilienM sbadia, mfisch, mgagne : just rebase ^
14:42 EmilienM CI should pass now, thanks to sbadia
14:42 sbadia haha with my dirty patch :)
14:45 mfisch thanks EmilienM I was trying to figure that out
14:45 EmilienM mfisch: don't worry :)
14:52 clayton can someone look at this review?  It's a fairly straightforward port of rabbit clustering support from puppet-cinder to the designate module: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192033/
15:02 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
15:07 mfisch EmilienM: yum is unhappy on my designate review
15:11 mdorman joined #puppet-openstack
15:15 mdorman can i recheck just one of the gate tests?  or is it all or nothing?
15:16 mdorman just wnat to recheck the tripleo test for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193328/
15:19 derekh mdorman: Fedora is having infrastructure problems at the moment, you may as well wait until this is merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193560/
15:25 cdent_ joined #puppet-openstack
15:25 mdorman ah cool
15:25 mdorman thanks
15:39 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
15:54 openstackgerrit Mike Dorman proposed openstack/puppet-nova: Add scheduler_driver parameter to nova::scheduler class  https://review.openstack.org/193609
15:56 EmilienM puppet4 is voting now \o/
15:57 EmilienM mfisch, clayton: can you +A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189448 ?
16:00 openstackgerrit Denis Egorenko proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: Update Sahara module  https://review.openstack.org/192721
16:01 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
16:03 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
16:04 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
16:05 dmsimard Hi cores, could you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119093 if you have a chance, it's about rbd with nova.
16:06 cwolferh joined #puppet-openstack
16:08 dmsimard EmilienM: Kilo releases are out but no stable/kilo branches ?
16:09 openstackgerrit David Moreau Simard proposed openstack/puppet-nova: Ensure /etc/nova exists before creating secret.xml  https://review.openstack.org/193617
16:09 EmilienM dmsimard: (again) Kilo is coming soon. I sent an email yesterday
16:09 openstackgerrit David Moreau Simard proposed openstack/puppet-nova: Ensure /etc/nova exists before creating secret.xml  https://review.openstack.org/193618
16:10 dmsimard EmilienM: Oooh, my bad, it was a juno release yesterday, not kilo. Sorry
16:10 dmsimard or wednesday, rather.
16:10 EmilienM dmsimard: http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-​dev@lists.openstack.org/msg56202.html
16:13 dmsimard EmilienM: Yup. I was mistaken.
16:26 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
16:26 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
16:29 richm question about puppet resource keystone_user and keystone_project with v3
16:30 richm with v3, there may be multiple users with the same name in different domains
16:31 richm should puppet resource always show the "fully qualified" name::domain e.g. keystone_user { 'admin::Default': ?
16:31 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
16:32 fedexo joined #puppet-openstack
16:50 richm another question - if there are users admin::foo admin::bar, what should puppet resource keystone_user admin show?
16:50 richm should it show both users?  should it fail with an error?
16:51 richm note that the new puppet-keystone v3 code allows you to specify keystone_user { 'admin': domain => 'foo'} and keystone_user { 'admin::bar': }
16:52 richm so if I'm writing a manifest, I may have used keystone_user { 'admin::foo': } and keystone_user { 'admin': domain => 'bar'}
16:53 richm I think the right answer is - "puppet resource keystone_user" should show only the fully qualified names
16:53 richm and
16:53 richm "puppet resource keystone_user admin" should show both
16:54 richm I think it will be quite surprising if "puppet resource keystone_user admin" returns nothing
16:58 saneax joined #puppet-openstack
17:00 ducttape_ EmilienM  - could you please assign this to mfisch? https://bugs.launchpad.net/p​uppet-keystone/+bug/1466681   (I work with him at TWC, I just don't want him loosing track of this bug)
17:00 openstack Launchpad bug 1466681 in puppet-keystone "keystone modwsgi python file has import failures" [Undecided,New]
17:01 ducttape_ I don't have permissions or the mental capacity to be able to assign bugs, it seems ;)
17:03 RichardRaseley joined #puppet-openstack
17:04 RichardRaseley EmilienM: Would you please review at your earliest convenience? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191946/
17:10 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
17:55 ferest joined #puppet-openstack
18:07 xarses joined #puppet-openstack
18:18 EmilienM RichardRaseley: done
18:18 RichardRaseley EmilienM: Thank you.
18:31 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
18:39 openstackgerrit Yanis Guenane proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Opencontrail: Create neutron::plugins::opencontrail  https://review.openstack.org/187986
18:42 mfisch EmilienM: you here?
18:43 mfisch I'm trying to figure out why puppet-keystone has a copy of keystone.py in it
18:43 mfisch looks like we just update it all the time
18:44 EmilienM mfisch: it has for long time, isn't ?
18:44 mfisch yes, but why dont we just use what keystone ships with?
18:45 EmilienM mfisch: we should, you can fix that if you like. I'll +1
18:46 mfisch I dont know the history
18:47 EmilienM I honestly think we should rely on packaging file.
18:47 mfisch let me dig a little
18:47 mfisch I can always update the file too
18:48 mfisch maybe the packages dont ship with it?
18:48 EmilienM oh I'm sure it does.
18:49 mfisch I will look
18:51 mfisch the ubuntu package doesnt have it
18:51 mfisch they will later in this cycle I bet
18:51 EmilienM well. It's in the keystone source code
18:52 aimon joined #puppet-openstack
18:52 mfisch sure
18:52 mfisch For now I think we update puppet and then we can see what the packagers plan on doing
18:53 openstackgerrit Matt Fischer proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Update keystone.py  https://review.openstack.org/193679
18:54 mfisch EmilienM: sounds like we need to keep that file probably for the rest of this cycle
19:05 wabu_ joined #puppet-openstack
19:07 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
19:29 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack-specs: Blueprint: Define our master branch policy  https://review.openstack.org/180141
19:30 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack-specs: Blueprint: Define our master branch policy  https://review.openstack.org/180141
19:31 EmilienM mfisch, mgagne, crinkle: I updated the blueprint ^ - feel free to review
19:33 mgagne EmilienM: after we cut a kilo release, what will happen to master? will a stable/kilo be created right away?
19:34 EmilienM yes
19:34 EmilienM and master will become 'liberty' as soon as we have package
19:34 EmilienM mgagne: this is exactly what we talked during the design session, when you was not here
19:34 mgagne EmilienM: I think one of the issues (among the others) is that people will use master to install the next stable version and will continue to do so (after openstack releases the next stable) until WE cut a stable release.
19:35 mgagne yes
19:35 EmilienM s/was/were/
19:35 EmilienM the steps are:
19:35 EmilienM create a stable branch from the last commit and then do a tag I guess
19:35 mgagne I'm trying to understand all the use cases. We are already aware of the "I install stable-1 from master". but there is also "I install stable from master because there is no stable branch yet"
19:36 EmilienM which is the case today
19:36 mgagne yep
19:36 mgagne furthermore
19:36 EmilienM kilo is stable in OpenStack but not in our modules
19:36 mgagne I guess as long as master works, there is no strong incentive to move to stable
19:37 EmilienM there is
19:37 mgagne not until we merge that policy you proposed =)
19:37 EmilienM indeed
19:37 EmilienM mgagne: when kilo release is out for us, I would like to gate Liberty
19:37 EmilienM and so on
19:37 mgagne because people will say "but it used to work for months before you broke it"
19:37 EmilienM so we need that branch.
19:37 mgagne true
19:38 EmilienM seriously, that discussion already happened
19:38 EmilienM and we kind of agreed
19:38 mgagne yep
19:38 mgagne I totally agree with you on that spec
19:38 EmilienM we need to be better in backports
19:38 EmilienM and spredzy is working on it with a tool (not merged yet)
19:39 EmilienM but in the meanwhile, I'm gently asking to people contributing to do the backports manually
19:39 mgagne my point is: we need to ride the "new stable release from openstack" wave while it's there and not wait for months before cutting our stable
19:39 mgagne yes
19:39 mgagne sure, 100% agree
19:39 EmilienM now we have beaker/puppet_3.X/4.X voting
19:39 EmilienM so I expect our modules more stable
19:39 EmilienM and more tested
19:39 mgagne which is awesome btw
19:39 EmilienM yeah +1
19:39 mgagne even better with the work done by crinkle to test against git and not forge
19:40 EmilienM I expect to make a stable/liberty right after official release if possible
19:40 mgagne we have been talking about it for years and it's the first time I see actually work done for it
19:40 EmilienM we could not do that before because we did not have plans
19:40 mgagne I'm sure bodepd will remember discussion we had at hong kong about it
19:40 EmilienM now we have plans, a (better) CI, and a policy, I think we're doing better
19:41 mgagne I'm really happy about it
19:41 EmilienM and doing a stable/liberty would not be so late comparing to the situation today
19:41 EmilienM honestly, we are just missing for keystone v3 thing today and I think we can make it
19:41 mgagne and if we can bring grenade in there, that would be awesome
19:41 EmilienM yeah, I'm thinking about that
19:41 EmilienM a grenade like
19:42 EmilienM mgagne: thanks to crinkle's work, we will be able to do stuffs like this
19:43 EmilienM mgagne: I would like to see 2 more jobs in our CI
19:43 EmilienM mgagne: a cross-project test, which is common across all modules, (would require a new repo I guess)
19:43 mgagne à-la devstack/tempest ?
19:43 EmilienM mgagne: and a grenade like job: it deploys master, applies your patch and then test if everything is alright
19:43 EmilienM mgagne: yes
19:43 EmilienM mgagne: for #1
19:43 mgagne cool
19:44 EmilienM mgagne: and #2 a devstack/grenade/temepst like
19:44 mgagne nice
19:44 EmilienM mgagne: after that. Well. I think we're doing good
19:44 mgagne yep
19:45 mgagne and for me, I should start testing all upstream changes against my composition layer :P
19:51 aimon joined #puppet-openstack
20:06 morazi joined #puppet-openstack
20:07 stevemar joined #puppet-openstack
20:22 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: beaker: update repourl to use centos mirror  https://review.openstack.org/193714
20:27 EmilienM RichardRaseley: I found an issue
20:27 EmilienM RichardRaseley: in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191942/
20:27 EmilienM RichardRaseley: since we have now beaker jobs voting, that means you'll have either to disable beaker for this new module or bring up your first patch that is passing CI :-)
20:32 EmilienM mgagne: when do we switch to #openstack-puppet ?
20:32 mgagne EmilienM: anytime, I think all people agreed that it was a good idea
20:33 mgagne EmilienM: we just have to make it happen, AFAIK fungi is the one who could help us with this move
20:33 EmilienM mgagne: we need to patch project-config/gerritbot
20:33 EmilienM but otherwise, I think we need to make it clear in the ML
20:34 mgagne EmilienM: the challenge is more/less with the social part of moving people to the new channel
20:34 dfisher mute the channel
20:34 EmilienM true
20:34 dfisher and set the topic
20:35 dfisher when people can't talk and the various bots don't speak … they'll learn :)
20:35 EmilienM oh, you can mute a channel?
20:35 dfisher moderated
20:35 dfisher set +m
20:35 dfisher only ops can talk
20:35 EmilienM cool
20:35 dfisher … i think it's +m
20:36 dfisher http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8018
20:36 mgagne there is a procedure fungi used, no need to reinvent one
20:36 dfisher or that.
20:36 mgagne https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/MovingChannels
20:38 EmilienM neat
20:43 mdorman argh not a fan of this tripleo gate test
20:49 EmilienM mdorman: why?
20:50 mdorman just failing a lot
20:50 mdorman for stuff not related to patch
20:51 EmilienM mdorman: yeah but it's not blocking you, is it?
20:51 EmilienM I think this CI is good to have for now, as a deployment use case
20:51 EmilienM but indeed, the CI is quite unstable lately
20:52 mdorman no, agreed agreed
20:52 mdorman no i wouldn’t say it’s blocking me
20:56 mdorman just annoying is all :)
20:58 EmilienM mdorman: consider it as a third party CI
21:03 mdorman gerrit doesn’t prevent merging if it fails?
21:04 EmilienM mdorman: no, it's not voting
21:07 mdorman ah, ok.  it doesn’t actually say non-voting in the review, so that’s why i was confused
21:08 EmilienM mdorman: ah yeah you're right it's not explicit
21:28 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
21:50 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-glance: Add acceptance test for glance image  https://review.openstack.org/182903
21:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/puppet-designate: Unpin beaker-rspec  https://review.openstack.org/189448
22:00 dfisher anybody around with any kind of passing knowledge of puppetlabs' CLA?
22:03 EmilienM to produce a kilo release, there are still some patches that we would need: https://etherpad.openstack​.org/p/puppet-kilo-release
22:03 EmilienM please review ^
22:15 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
22:16 chem joined #puppet-openstack
22:19 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
22:39 clayton EmilienM: it looks like it's blocking my designate patch from merging
22:42 clayton gate-puppet-designate-puppe​t-beaker-rspec-dsvm-centos7 is one of the jobs we're talking about right?
22:42 clayton it's voting for designate
22:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/puppet-designate: Add support for RabbitMQ clustering  https://review.openstack.org/192033
23:07 zigo joined #puppet-openstack
23:15 rcallawa joined #puppet-openstack
23:25 wabu joined #puppet-openstack
23:28 dalees joined #puppet-openstack
23:32 fedexo joined #puppet-openstack
23:34 ianw joined #puppet-openstack
23:34 snk joined #puppet-openstack
23:41 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
23:41 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack

| Channels | #puppet-openstack index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary