Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #puppet-openstack, 2015-09-02

| Channels | #puppet-openstack index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:09 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
00:25 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
00:44 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
01:00 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
01:02 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
01:02 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user provider  https://review.openstack.org/218688
01:02 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user_role provider  https://review.openstack.org/219084
01:13 xarses joined #puppet-openstack
01:18 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
01:22 tiswanso joined #puppet-openstack
01:24 aimon joined #puppet-openstack
01:26 tiswanso joined #puppet-openstack
01:28 aimon_ joined #puppet-openstack
01:30 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
01:31 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
01:31 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user provider  https://review.openstack.org/218688
01:31 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user_role provider  https://review.openstack.org/219084
01:38 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
01:48 ilbot3 joined #puppet-openstack
01:48 Topic for #puppet-openstack is now Puppet/OpenStack: Weekly meeting (every Tuesday 15:00 UTC): https://wiki.openstack.org/w​iki/Meetings/PuppetOpenStack - Logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org​/irclogs/%23puppet-openstack/ - On going efforts: https://trello.com/puppetopenstack
01:57 zhangjn_ joined #puppet-openstack
01:59 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
02:02 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user_role provider  https://review.openstack.org/219084
02:06 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
02:07 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
02:09 gildub richm, re user story 62
02:09 gildub richm, in the tenant one you said the self.instances needs the domain check too.
02:10 richm it doesn't need the domain check
02:10 richm it needs to handle domains in the new way - that is, use short name if in the default domain, otherwise, use the name + ::domain
02:11 richm same with keystone_user and keystone_group
02:11 gildub richm, ah yeah, I understand your comment now! :)
02:13 gildub richm, ok, great, I was going to ask you what was the decided approach for this one!
02:15 gildub richm, just to be 100% crystal clear:  use short name if in the default domain whether it's been set or not, correct?
02:15 richm gildub: Yes, since that is what domain_check() is checking for
02:16 gildub richm, yeah, well at least for Liberty!
02:17 richm gildub: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/op​enstack-dev/2015-September/073425.html
02:17 gildub richm, yep
02:18 richm gildub: hmm - I guess that email should be changed, since it will allow default_domain_id to be set if it is set to 'default'
02:18 richm it == your current implementation
02:20 gildub richm, well that's the case for Liberty, once in Mitaka the default could be anything, per that email
02:21 gildub gildub, since having todo code and comments won't be accepted (which makes sense), I'm doing what's effective for Liberty but anticipating future deprecation changes
02:22 richm ok
02:22 gildub richm, well, at least trying to... ^^
02:23 gildub richm, I know the initial intend of not mandatory ::domain was noble especially in regards of backward compatibility with v2, but unfortunately that's turning around against us!
02:23 gildub richm, anyway, I'm changing the self.instances too now.
02:27 richm ok - I am signing off now
02:29 gildub richm, sure
02:33 openstackgerrit Adam Vinsh proposed openstack/puppet-swift: WIP Manage swift with swiftinit service provider  https://review.openstack.org/203220
02:42 tiswanso_ joined #puppet-openstack
02:51 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
03:02 EmilienM vinsh: yes, it's fixed now or it should be soon
03:03 EmilienM vinsh: https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1259075
03:03 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1259075 in Package Review "Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw-ext - Extensions for JSONPath RW" [Medium,New] - Assigned to nobody
03:03 EmilienM oops, this one is for ceilometer
03:05 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
03:08 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: CI test  https://review.openstack.org/219539
03:32 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: acceptance: pin RDO to stable Delorean URL  https://review.openstack.org/219393
03:48 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: acceptance: disable lbaas service plugin  https://review.openstack.org/219393
03:49 EmilienM mfisch: this one is an outstanding review to unblock Neutron CI ^
03:49 mfisch k
03:49 EmilienM if anyone from core team can bookmark it and make it land, it would unblock our CI
03:49 mfisch do we have a bug filed to track the stuff we want to turn back on?
03:49 EmilienM yes
03:49 EmilienM for this one, it's in the commit message
03:50 EmilienM I can even add a todo
03:50 EmilienM let me amend
03:51 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: acceptance: disable lbaas service plugin  https://review.openstack.org/219393
03:51 EmilienM mfisch: ^
03:53 EmilienM mfisch: see https://etherpad.openstack.o​rg/p/puppet-liberty-blocker
03:53 mfisch perfect forgot about that
03:54 EmilienM mfisch: this etherpad is up to date
04:00 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
04:05 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Make sure Nova_admin_tenant_id_setter is executed after Keystone_endpoint  https://review.openstack.org/216950
04:06 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Make sure Neutron_config is applied before Neutron_network  https://review.openstack.org/218474
04:08 EmilienM mfisch: I found your OVS issue
04:08 EmilienM we are running the same now
04:08 EmilienM see https://jenkins04.openstack.org/jo​b/gate-puppet-neutron-puppet-beake​r-rspec-dsvm-trusty/89/consoleFull
04:08 EmilienM 2015-09-02 04:04:31.530
04:08 EmilienM 2015-09-02 04:04:31.531 |  openvswitch-switch : Depends: init-system-helpers (>= 1.18~) but 1.14 is to be installed
04:08 mfisch mine installs ok
04:09 EmilienM not with liberty staging
04:09 EmilienM I guess
04:09 mfisch yeah probably not
04:10 EmilienM will see tomorrow
04:10 mfisch good night
05:01 cgfbee joined #puppet-openstack
05:04 mtreinish joined #puppet-openstack
05:06 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
05:12 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
05:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/puppet-keystone: Add custom fragment to vhost  https://review.openstack.org/207887
05:30 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
05:39 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
05:39 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
05:55 stamak joined #puppet-openstack
06:09 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
06:28 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
06:42 social joined #puppet-openstack
07:16 jpena joined #puppet-openstack
07:35 vinsh joined #puppet-openstack
07:40 stamak joined #puppet-openstack
07:42 c0m0 joined #puppet-openstack
08:04 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Domain checking and naming for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
08:05 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
08:05 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Domain checking and naming for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
08:05 rochaporto joined #puppet-openstack
08:11 jistr joined #puppet-openstack
08:13 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
08:14 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Domain checking and naming for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
08:14 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user provider  https://review.openstack.org/218688
08:14 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use domain checking for user_role provider  https://review.openstack.org/219084
08:21 paramite joined #puppet-openstack
08:50 derekh joined #puppet-openstack
08:57 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
09:04 arnaud_orange joined #puppet-openstack
09:17 sanjayu joined #puppet-openstack
09:28 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
09:31 EmilienM good morning
09:38 degorenko morning o/
09:40 skolekonov morning
09:41 jpena joined #puppet-openstack
09:53 msimonin joined #puppet-openstack
09:58 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
10:20 sanjayu_ joined #puppet-openstack
10:23 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
10:48 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
11:03 c0m0 joined #puppet-openstack
11:48 bapalm joined #puppet-openstack
11:53 iurygregory good morning =)
12:12 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
12:13 dprince joined #puppet-openstack
12:31 msimonin joined #puppet-openstack
12:33 timrc joined #puppet-openstack
12:47 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
12:51 vinsh jpena|lunch: Thanks for looking at 203220.  It might make sense to allow swiftinit as an option and not default.  I wondered in which ways you think it might be breaking compatibility?  Upgrades do work from master to this patch.
12:55 sanjayu joined #puppet-openstack
13:04 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
13:04 sanjayu_ joined #puppet-openstack
13:05 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
13:10 bklei joined #puppet-openstack
13:16 tiswanso joined #puppet-openstack
13:18 mflobo joined #puppet-openstack
13:19 morazi joined #puppet-openstack
13:23 jpena vinsh: about the compatibility, I meant breaking the default behaviour from previous versions
13:24 vinsh It's true it would be different.  I would suggest that in all ways it can be better managed using swift-init then relying on distribution provided means.
13:24 vinsh Your suggestion of adding it as an OPTION to start with is likely the best way to move forward.
13:25 vinsh I guess it would let people test that method and see if they prefer it.
13:26 vinsh Right now, in ubuntu the default init scripts and service management using upstart and puppet arn't really great.
13:26 vinsh You can for example be tailing /var/log/proxy.log on ubuntu
13:26 vinsh and upstart provider interprets that as swift-proxy is running
13:26 vinsh since it only does sloppy process table matching.
13:28 mflobo left #puppet-openstack
13:28 jpena ouch. I think systemd does it better
13:28 vinsh I agree, I didn't know much about systemd will I took this on.. and it is more robust.
13:29 vinsh Suppose ubuntu is there in 15.x release
13:29 vinsh *will/unitl
13:30 vinsh I don't think systemd allows for graceful swift process restart though.  swift-init stop vs shutdown reload vs restart.
13:31 vinsh Maybe those things only provide a marginal benefit to end users.
13:32 vinsh My goal is to extend this patch into supporting dedicated replication servers for swift
13:32 vinsh something that would be messy if not done exclusively with swift-init.
13:33 vinsh In that future patch it can be "if you want to used dedicated replication networks, the swifinit provider is required"
13:34 richm joined #puppet-openstack
13:35 partner would anybody happen to have a somewhat functional example of ceilometer compute node manifest?
13:36 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
13:41 partner it seems to be impossible to get keystone configs into ceilometer.conf using the module
13:42 EmilienM for people who participates to our sprint, please go on #openstack-sprint
13:48 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Domain checking and naming for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
13:53 ducttape_ joined #puppet-openstack
13:54 bklei_ joined #puppet-openstack
14:01 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
14:12 nibalizer hiya
14:13 nibalizer is the sprint running here or in the sprint channel?
14:13 nibalizer oh now I see
14:13 openstackgerrit Martin Mágr proposed openstack/puppet-tripleo: Add package_manifest resource.  https://review.openstack.org/203803
14:25 delattec joined #puppet-openstack
14:39 partner right, this bit me for hours.. https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1240740
14:39 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1240740 in openstack-ceilometer "Environment file missing for openstack-ceilometer-polling.service" [High,Closed: errata] - Assigned to pkilambi
14:42 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
14:43 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
14:43 dfisher joined #puppet-openstack
14:45 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
14:45 avirambh joined #puppet-openstack
14:46 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
14:46 _ody `/join #openstack-sprint
14:47 _ody typo
14:47 cdelatte joined #puppet-openstack
14:47 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
14:50 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
14:56 avirambh EmilienM, spredzy: hey! can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209997/ again?
14:57 chandankumar left #puppet-openstack
15:00 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Keystone V3 support with domain checking  https://review.openstack.org/218044
15:01 openstackgerrit Gilles Dubreuil proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Domain checking and naming for tenant provider  https://review.openstack.org/218059
15:01 tiswanso joined #puppet-openstack
15:04 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
15:23 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
15:27 vmbrasseur left #puppet-openstack
15:30 richm joined #puppet-openstack
15:37 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
16:09 aimon joined #puppet-openstack
16:14 thartmann joined #puppet-openstack
16:27 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
16:30 sergmelikyan joined #puppet-openstack
16:32 sergmelikyan joined #puppet-openstack
16:33 arnaud_orange joined #puppet-openstack
16:39 zacdev joined #puppet-openstack
16:40 dprince joined #puppet-openstack
16:42 sergmelikyan joined #puppet-openstack
16:44 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
16:44 angdraug joined #puppet-openstack
16:46 sergmelikyan joined #puppet-openstack
16:50 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
17:15 openstackgerrit Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: [WIP] Support for Keystone as Identity Provider  https://review.openstack.org/208054
17:15 openstackgerrit Alex Schultz proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: Use Ubuntu provided wsgi.py for keystone.wsgi  https://review.openstack.org/219793
17:21 xingchao joined #puppet-openstack
17:26 darkxploit joined #puppet-openstack
17:31 xingchao_ joined #puppet-openstack
17:35 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
17:35 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
17:35 guimaluf joined #puppet-openstack
17:36 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
17:43 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack_extras: repo/ubuntu: allow to change uca repo name  https://review.openstack.org/219800
17:49 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219804
18:00 thartmann joined #puppet-openstack
18:04 chandankumar joined #puppet-openstack
18:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/puppet-openstack_extras: repo/ubuntu: allow to change uca repo name  https://review.openstack.org/219800
18:19 paramite joined #puppet-openstack
18:22 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack-integration: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219818
18:26 iurygregory If anyone can review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208054/ ^^
18:35 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-ceilometer: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219824
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-cinder: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219825
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219826
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-glance: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219827
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-heat: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219828
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-horizon: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219829
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-ironic: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219830
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-manila: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219831
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219832
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-swift: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219833
18:36 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-trove: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219834
18:40 paramite joined #puppet-openstack
18:40 xarses joined #puppet-openstack
18:47 richm iurygregory: join #openstack-sprint
18:48 iurygregory done ^^
19:00 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
19:08 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-nova: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219844
19:09 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219845
19:09 EmilienM mgagne: can you join #openstack-sprint just for a quick question please? cc mfisch
19:21 linkedinyou joined #puppet-openstack
19:32 openstackgerrit Bradley Klein proposed openstack/puppet-monasca: New mysql schema for fujitsu logging changes that have merged  https://review.openstack.org/219854
19:32 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
19:42 openstackgerrit Bradley Klein proposed openstack/puppet-monasca: New mysql schema for fujitsu logging changes that have merged  https://review.openstack.org/219854
19:57 openstackgerrit Matt Fischer proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Remove unused variable in params.pp  https://review.openstack.org/219860
19:57 openstackgerrit Matt Fischer proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: Fix neutron_agent_linuxbridge file path  https://review.openstack.org/216523
20:13 jtomasek joined #puppet-openstack
20:37 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
20:46 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
21:00 guimaluf hey all, when using the keystone class I could not get openstackclient install correctly. I'm using ubuntu 14.04, keystone 6.0.0 and kilo repo. I keep getting this Error: Could not prefetch keystone_domain provider 'openstack': Execution of '/usr/bin/openstack domain list --quiet --format csv' returned 1: ERROR: openstackclient.shell Exception raised: (pbr 0.7.0 (/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages), Requirement.parse('pbr>=0.6,!=0.7
21:00 guimaluf ,<1.0')). If I install the repository and the package manually it's installed correctly
21:06 guimaluf after running mannualy apt-get upgrade -fy openstackclient is ok. there is some issue with latest packages
21:10 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-heat: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219828
21:10 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-ironic: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219830
21:10 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-swift: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219833
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-trove: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219834
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-sahara: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219845
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-manila: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219831
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-glance: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219827
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-nova: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219844
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-ceilometer: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219824
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-neutron: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219832
21:11 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-horizon: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219829
21:12 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-designate: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219826
21:12 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-cinder: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219825
21:12 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack-integration: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219818
21:13 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-keystone: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219804
21:15 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/puppet-openstack-integration: acceptance: bump trusty packaging to trusty-proposed/liberty  https://review.openstack.org/219818
21:19 tfhartmann joined #puppet-openstack
21:32 openstackgerrit Alex Schultz proposed openstack/puppet-swift: Security hardening for /etc/swift  https://review.openstack.org/219883
21:33 derekh joined #puppet-openstack
21:59 bklei joined #puppet-openstack
21:59 bklei joined #puppet-openstack
22:08 bklei joined #puppet-openstack
22:20 pancake_ joined #puppet-openstack
22:32 zhangjn joined #puppet-openstack
22:38 bklei joined #puppet-openstack
23:15 gildub joined #puppet-openstack
23:22 gildub richm, hi - in tenant/user providers, What's default vs ldap backend stuff in rpsec tests, I don't see any difference between them?
23:23 gildub richm, I mean we don't do the ldap mock anyway (or at least not yet)
23:23 gildub richm, I missed something
23:23 gildub richm, ^ sorry, unless I missed something
23:46 markvoelker joined #puppet-openstack
23:46 richm gildub: "the original code fails" - does that mean master branch is failing?
23:47 richm gildub: and by "fails" do you mean spec unit or spec acceptance tests?
23:48 gildub richm, never mind, I fixed it, better with morning eyes, got lost in the 'foo' examples, too many foo
23:49 gildub richm, although my question remains regarding the backends
23:50 richm gildub: when using the ldap backend, you cannot do user create --tenant tenant and have the user added to the tenant automatically
23:51 richm gildub: that only works when using the default sql backend
23:51 richm . . . and the sooner that tenant code in keystone_user goes away, the better . . .
23:52 gildub richm, ^ I can see that now! :)
23:54 richm gildub: although that may have changed . . . because looking it at it now, there is no difference between the ldap backend case and the sql backend case in the spec
23:55 gildub richm, yeah that's why I raise the question
23:56 gildub richm, but I might just leave that for another review to clean it or revisit, what do you think?
23:56 richm I think leave it alone for now, and revisit later
23:58 gildub richm, ok

| Channels | #puppet-openstack index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary