| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:32 |
mwn3d_phone |
Did anyone just watch watson on jeopardy? It was awesome. |
| 01:16 |
|
Mathnerd314 joined #rosettacode |
| 01:43 |
|
realazthat_ left #rosettacode |
| 01:43 |
|
opticron left #rosettacode |
| 01:44 |
|
opticron joined #rosettacode |
| 01:46 |
|
parsleyfirefly joined #rosettacode |
| 01:49 |
|
shortcircuit joined #rosettacode |
| 02:14 |
shortcircuit |
I suspect we could probably describe tasks on Rosetta Code as falling among four categories: Feature tasks, algorithm tasks, problem tasks and project tasks. |
| 02:18 |
shortcircuit |
Feature tasks explicitly ask for demonstration of language features and core idioms. This might include things ranging from syntax to design patterns. [[Loops/For]], [[Documentation]] and [[Singleton]] would be included. |
| 02:18 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Loops/For http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Documentation http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Singleton |
| 02:21 |
shortcircuit |
Algorithm tasks would be those that specifically ask for implementation and/or demonstration of well-known problems like named sorting algorithms or classic computer science problems. [[Quicksort]], [[Dining Philosophers]] and [[Towers of Hanoi]] might be included. |
| 02:21 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Quicksort http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Dining_Philosophers (Doesn't exist.) http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Towers_of_Hanoi |
| 02:25 |
shortcircuit |
Problem tasks and project tasks are similar, with their primary difference being complexity. These would include most interactive tasks, and any task whose solution for most languages involves combining things which might have individually been able to be described as separate tasks. [[23 game]], [[Counting in Factors]] and any of the Execute tasks like [[Execute Brain****]] would fall among these. |
| 02:25 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/23_game (Doesn't exist.) http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Counting_in_Factors http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Execute_Brain**** |
| 02:26 |
shortcircuit |
Not sure how best to differentiate between problem tasks and project tasks; a hard rule seems silly, particularly when the primary observable difference is that the code examples tend to be much larger in project tasks. |
| 02:28 |
|
SoniaKeys joined #rosettacode |
| 02:41 |
shortcircuit |
mwn3d_phone: Freenode was under a sustained DDoS earlier. Don't know if they still are. |
| 02:41 |
mwn3d_phone |
Oh...I guess I'm not keeping up on my internet news. |
| 02:41 |
shortcircuit |
mwn3d_phone: It was sent out as an IRC "global notice" on the network. |
| 02:41 |
shortcircuit |
I'm guessing your IRC client didn't show it. |
| 02:46 |
|
SoniaKeys left #rosettacode |
| 02:52 |
mwn3d_phone |
Oh you know what? It did. But when I clicked it to read the whole message nothing came up. |
| 02:54 |
sorear |
shortcircuit: Is "Empty program" or "Hello World" etc a problem or a feature? |
| 02:56 |
shortcircuit |
sorear: [[Empty program]] would be a feature-type task, I think; it demonstrates the minimum execution language code for a valid program. |
| 02:56 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Empty_program |
| 02:57 |
shortcircuit |
For, [[Hello World]] it could go either way, depending on how it's written. |
| 02:57 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Hello_World |
| 02:57 |
shortcircuit |
If it's written as "Write the Hello World" program, then it would be a problem-type task. If it's written as "output the string 'Hello world!'", then it's a feature task. |
| 02:58 |
shortcircuit |
er. *"If it's written as 'Write the Hello World program'" |
| 02:59 |
shortcircuit |
The ambiguity comes from the simplicity of the original program's behavior. |
| 03:01 |
shortcircuit |
"minimum execution language code"? Ick. I might more precisely have said "Minimum code for defining a program in that language" |
| 03:07 |
sorear |
"minimum program length required to demonstrate that the result of the compiler depends on the input" |
| 03:41 |
|
realazthat_ joined #rosettacode |
| 05:19 |
|
Mathnerd314 left #rosettacode |
| 06:34 |
|
mwn3d_phone left #rosettacode |
| 07:39 |
|
FireFly joined #rosettacode |
| 08:07 |
|
FireFly left #rosettacode |
| 13:21 |
|
mwn3d_phone joined #rosettacode |
| 13:42 |
|
mwn3d_phone left #rosettacode |
| 13:43 |
|
mwn3d_phone joined #rosettacode |
| 13:58 |
|
slavik1 left #rosettacode |
| 13:58 |
|
slavik1 joined #rosettacode |
| 15:10 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
| 15:21 |
|
parsleyfirefly1 joined #rosettacode |
| 15:22 |
|
parsleyfirefly left #rosettacode |
| 15:22 |
|
parsleyfirefly1 is now known as parsleyfirefly |
| 15:25 |
|
kpreid joined #rosettacode |
| 15:28 |
kpreid |
shortcircuit: Erm, Planet RC is being a bit broken. It has shown two old posts from 2010 as current |
| 15:29 |
kpreid |
(of my blog) |
| 15:29 |
shortcircuit |
Hm. |
| 15:29 |
kpreid |
I did recently change the tags on those posts, but that shouldn't be causing them to appear as new |
| 15:29 |
kpreid |
especially given using an atom feed which has guids |
| 15:29 |
kpreid |
or rather: |
| 15:30 |
kpreid |
it is displaying those posts with a date of NOW and completely ignoring the date in the feed |
| 15:30 |
kpreid |
or using the <updated> date rather than the <published> date, I see checking my feed |
| 15:30 |
kpreid |
anyway this is clearly wrong, as you can see it is showing my 2010 google intern post as if I posted it this week |
| 15:31 |
kpreid |
which is a rather severe misrepresentation |
| 15:31 |
kpreid |
I recognize this is probably some design flaw in the planet code, but if it turns out to be a misconfiguration instead please fix... |
| 15:48 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: Looking at the DOM of the atom feed, looking at the entry node for "Google again", the 'updated' property, which planetplanet appears to use for dates, contains 2011-02-12T14:28:29Z, which is the value displayed on the planet. |
| 15:48 |
kpreid |
Yes, and that is the mistake. |
| 15:48 |
kpreid |
A post shouldn't be solely dated by its last-modified. |
| 15:49 |
kpreid |
Well. |
| 15:49 |
kpreid |
Some people might prefer that. |
| 15:49 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: It depends on the blog, really. Several blogs I read go back and update the same entry multiple times, rather than post follow-up blog entries. |
| 15:49 |
shortcircuit |
For your blog, that doesn't make sense, of course. |
| 15:49 |
kpreid |
I do edit with updates sometimes, but only on 'in the past couple of days' sort of things. |
| 15:49 |
shortcircuit |
Unfortunately, planetplanet doesn't appear to offer per-feed configuration (or even global configuration) on the matter. |
| 15:49 |
kpreid |
Can you at least get it to display the post's original date? |
| 15:50 |
shortcircuit |
I'll try. It'll take effect across all the feeds, though. |
| 15:52 |
kpreid |
I understand this is not a simple problem in choosing behaviors; it's just that showing my 2010-intern post after mt 2011-intern post is, well, quite misleading |
| 15:53 |
shortcircuit |
Mm. That didn't seem to do it. :-| |
| 15:59 |
shortcircuit |
No wonder I can't get this working right. |
| 15:59 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: Your 'published' and 'updated' nodes hold the same date. |
| 16:00 |
kpreid |
Huh? |
| 16:00 |
kpreid |
<title>Those that leave one Googly-eyed</title> <published>2010-03-12T03:48:19Z</published> <updated>2011-02-12T14:28:29Z</updated> |
| 16:03 |
shortcircuit |
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9602/atomfeed.png |
| 16:04 |
kpreid |
that's the newer post |
| 16:04 |
kpreid |
"Google again" |
| 16:05 |
shortcircuit |
Ok, now my head really hurts. When I paste http://kpreid.livejournal.com/data/atom/?itemid=36022 into my browser, I come up with a feed with a single item dated Jan 18, 2038. |
| 16:05 |
kpreid |
Well, don't do that then. |
| 16:05 |
kpreid |
Where did you come up with that URL? |
| 16:05 |
mwn3d_phone |
the year 2038 problem? |
| 16:06 |
mwn3d_phone |
That's not supposed to come up for a lot of years |
| 16:06 |
kpreid |
ah, I see the rel=self |
| 16:06 |
kpreid |
that is .. weird and broken on lj's part |
| 16:06 |
kpreid |
but it shouldn't be necessary to dereference that url |
| 16:09 |
shortcircuit |
Ok, now I found the Googly-eyed link at the bottom of the RSS feed. |
| 16:10 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: I modified the planet software to completely ignore the 'updated' field, using 'published' in its place. Same result. It looks like the bug is in the template, which I don't have time to dig into and fix. |
| 16:10 |
shortcircuit |
At least, not while I'm at work. |
| 16:10 |
kpreid |
OK. |
| 16:10 |
kpreid |
Same result might also be due to some index/cache? |
| 16:10 |
shortcircuit |
Tried clearing the cache. Then tried clearing the cache when I discovered it wasn't where I thought it was. |
| 16:12 |
shortcircuit |
Problem is, I think the template is using the same date for all feed items for a given feed, and it happened to get that from the most recent feed item. |
| 16:12 |
kpreid |
That is highly plausible. |
| 16:12 |
kpreid |
I think the planet groups all 'new' posts from *all* feeds in one date header. |
| 16:12 |
kpreid |
It doesn't insert older posts in older positions. |
| 16:18 |
shortcircuit |
It groups them per-feed, but it shows per-item dates, which is what's weird and buggy. |
| 16:18 |
shortcircuit |
Also, the sorting, but yeah. |
| 17:24 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
| 18:13 |
|
FireFly joined #rosettacode |
| 18:35 |
|
kpreid joined #rosettacode |
| 18:57 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
| 18:59 |
|
BenBE left #rosettacode |
| 19:05 |
|
BenBE joined #rosettacode |
| 19:05 |
|
kpreid joined #rosettacode |
| 19:53 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
| 20:03 |
|
kpreid joined #rosettacode |
| 20:16 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: Re your note on adaptive programming. I was thinking of creating a "Rock Paper Scissors" game task, seeded with an example that switched strategies based on how well they perform. Sounds adaptive to me. |
| 20:18 |
shortcircuit |
It should be pretty easy to use a markov model as a predictor for the human player's choice, and flip to and from a 'pure random' strategy when either underperforms. |
| 20:19 |
shortcircuit |
When I mentioned this to parsleyfirefly, she suggested https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Rock-paper-scissors-lizard-spock instead. Seems interesting enough. :) |
| 20:22 |
kpreid |
shortcircuit: What note? |
| 20:23 |
kpreid |
I recently wrote something about dynamic programming, but that is completely unrelated. |
| 20:24 |
shortcircuit |
http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Suggest_a_programming_task&diff=101719&oldid=prev |
| 20:24 |
fedaykin |
"Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Suggest a programming task - Rosetta Code" http://rldn.net/ATa |
| 20:24 |
shortcircuit |
My understanding of dynamic programming is that it involves algorithms which change strategy based on which strategy is deemed more effective. |
| 20:24 |
kpreid |
No. |
| 20:25 |
kpreid |
Dynamic programming is a type of algorithm where it fills in a table structure as it proceeds, sort of a one-off memoization. |
| 20:25 |
shortcircuit |
Ah. |
| 20:26 |
shortcircuit |
Yeah, I see that now. I hadn't looked at the WP article until just now. |
| 20:26 |
kpreid |
I understand it's a valuable technique, but I've never noticed having a use for it, so I'd like to learn more. |
| 20:26 |
kpreid |
ââ¬ÅThe word dynamic was chosen by Bellman to capture the time-varying aspect of the problems, and also because it sounded impressive. The word programming referred to the use of the method to find an optimal program, in the sense of a military schedule for training or logistics. This usage is the same as that in the phrases linear programming and mathematical programming, a synonym for optimization.ââ¬Â |
| 20:28 |
shortcircuit |
I'm starting to *hate* the word 'dynamic'. It's overused to the point of being ambiguous. I'm _certain_ I've seen it used in the sense in which I interpreted your note. |
| 20:29 |
kpreid |
In the absence of specific usages, your interpretation would be reasonable. |
| 20:30 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: When you say, "sort of a one-off memoization", are you talking about caching that persists between program runs? |
| 20:30 |
kpreid |
No. |
| 20:30 |
kpreid |
I mean that the table is discarded when the algorithm completes. |
| 20:31 |
shortcircuit |
Ah. |
| 20:31 |
kpreid |
For a sort-of example, the iterative definition of the Fibonacci function: it keeps a record of previous values (only the last two, though) but only produces one number for a result. |
| 20:32 |
shortcircuit |
If I'm using the terms correctly, then, would tying memoization results to an object class instance, and then destroying that instance on completion of the algorithm qualify? |
| 20:32 |
kpreid |
In actual dynamic programming, I understand, you can have e.g. two-dimensional tables, and N-back lookups |
| 20:33 |
kpreid |
Maybe. |
| 20:33 |
kpreid |
As I said, I don't really understand DP. |
| 20:33 |
kpreid |
Having good RC tasks for me to work on would be enlightening. |
| 20:34 |
kpreid |
BTW, it would be neat to someday have a way to take a view of RC which for each task shows only a particular set of languages. |
| 20:36 |
kpreid |
Given the right interface and defaults, this would eliminate the negative aspects of RC including everyone's pet programming language. |
| 20:36 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: Largely dependent on getting the Semantic MediaWiki stuff working right. Coderjoe almost had that working for assembling task pages, and I don't know why the template didn't work. |
| 20:39 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: The other side to getting the SMW stuff working is learning how to get template parameters escaped properly when desired. Never getting hung up on languages like ".QL" or library names like "SomeModule::SomeSubModule" would be really nice. |
| 20:39 |
shortcircuit |
I tried adding some basic semantic properties to [[Template:Language]], but got blocked by those issues. |
| 20:39 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Template:Language |
| 20:40 |
shortcircuit |
Or, rather, those kinds of issues. |
| 20:41 |
shortcircuit |
kpreid: OTOH, [[User:Tyrok]] might be able to modify the language show/hide script to have your selections persist across pages and browser sessions. |
| 20:41 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/User:Tyrok (Doesn't exist.) |
| 20:41 |
shortcircuit |
Hm. He didn't create a user page? |
| 20:44 |
kpreid |
No contributions for that username. Misspelled? |
| 20:44 |
shortcircuit |
Probably |
| 20:46 |
shortcircuit |
Ah |
| 20:46 |
shortcircuit |
[[User:Tyrok1]] |
| 20:46 |
fedaykin |
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/User:Tyrok1 |
| 20:48 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
| 20:58 |
|
kpreid joined #rosettacode |
| 21:03 |
|
dom96 left #rosettacode |
| 21:05 |
|
dom96 joined #rosettacode |
| 21:59 |
|
parsleyfirefly left #rosettacode |
| 22:14 |
|
parsleyfirefly joined #rosettacode |
| 22:26 |
|
Mathnerd314 joined #rosettacode |
| 23:26 |
|
Mathnerd314 left #rosettacode |
| 23:50 |
|
FireFly left #rosettacode |
| 23:53 |
|
kpreid left #rosettacode |
