Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #rosettacode, 2011-12-19

| Channels | #rosettacode index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
02:58 kpreid joined #rosettacode
06:48 mischi joined #rosettacode
07:23 r4m joined #rosettacode
08:30 r4m joined #rosettacode
09:14 mischi joined #rosettacode
09:54 mwn3d_phone joined #rosettacode
12:46 mwn3d_phone1 joined #rosettacode
12:46 TimToady_ joined #rosettacode
12:48 dom96 joined #rosettacode
12:48 trnv2 joined #rosettacode
12:50 FireFly joined #rosettacode
12:50 mischi joined #rosettacode
12:51 CodeBlock joined #rosettacode
12:52 CodeBlock joined #rosettacode
12:52 mikemol joined #rosettacode
13:00 mikemol joined #rosettacode
14:20 eel2 joined #rosettacode
14:26 dagnyscott joined #rosettacode
14:27 GlitchMr joined #rosettacode
14:31 eel2 joined #rosettacode
14:48 mwn3d_phone We passed 24k examples recently
14:48 mwn3d_phone We have 24024 according to the SMW statistics
14:57 eMBee nice number :-)
15:18 mikemol I should ask Sarumon if there's syntax to count that, now.
15:18 mikemol Didn't used to be, but we just jumped two minor versions.
15:34 mwn3d_phone mikemol: what kind of syntax? Like #ask syntax?
15:34 mikemol Yeah
15:35 mwn3d_phone There is a "count" format
15:35 mwn3d_phone Since version 0.7
15:36 mikemol Last I recall, 'count' didn't give that number, but gave the number of unique pages the property was applied to.
15:36 mikemol So, it gave the number of unique pages the property was applied to, not how many times the property was applied.
15:36 mwn3d_phone Ahhh
15:37 mwn3d_phone Difference in interpretation for "number of results"
15:40 mikemol Well, when your resultset is a list of pages, that'd be the correct implementation of 'count'.
15:40 mwn3d_phone I see "enumeration" on [[Special:Ask]]
15:40 fedaykin http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Ask
15:40 mwn3d_phone I don't thank that's it though
17:23 kpreid joined #rosettacode
17:46 mwn3d_phone That silverfrost page seems to be about a windows implementation of fortran 95
17:47 mwn3d_phone I can't remember how we handle implementations...I can look into it later if no one gets around to fixing it
17:48 mikemol mwn3d_phone: Generally leave it up to people more familiar with the language in question.
17:48 mikemol There's a way to mark something as an implementation of something else, but there's often enough of a superset for it to be regarded as its own language.
17:49 mikemol We've got PureBASIC distinct from other forms of BASIC, for example.
17:49 mwn3d_phone Well I would want to deal with it at least a little bit pretty soon
17:49 mwn3d_phone Right now it kinda looks like a garbage page
17:50 mikemol Heh
17:50 mikemol Yeah
17:50 mikemol Just looked at it
17:52 mikemol Looking at http://www.silverfrost.com/default.aspx, I'd venture a guess it's best classed as an implementation.
17:52 fedaykin "Silverfrost"
18:00 mikemol Here's an example of how implementation-of is currently handled: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Pugs
18:00 fedaykin "Pugs - Rosetta Code"
22:17 Kumul joined #rosettacode
23:27 mwn3d_phone1 joined #rosettacode

| Channels | #rosettacode index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary